Team comparison UM/MSU

Dental Dawg

Redshirt
Dec 6, 2008
1,393
0
0
Wallace 14 TD's 13 INT 2549 yds
Russell 21 TD's 4 INT 2523 yds
Moncrief 7 TD's 775 yds
Bumphis 10 TD's 758 yds
Scott 6 TD's 719 yds
Perkins 8 TD's 895 yds

Looking at the numbers, I'd say the stats favor MSU. The QB stats speak the loudest (TD/INT ratio). Wallace is a duel threat, but his shoulder may hinder his play. If we win the turnover battle, we win the game.
 

mcdawg22

Heisman
Sep 18, 2004
13,064
10,444
113
Those look good but you do have to account for Wallace's 8 Rushing TD's.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,349
25,540
113
Relf/Russell have 6 rushing TDs and their combined QB rating is 144.0. Wallace/Brunetti have 10 rushing TDs and their combined QB rating is 136.7. Slight edge to MSU that could be a big edge if Wallace's shoulder is causing him trouble.
 

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
Don't forget the biggest stat - number of wins.

The other stats don't matter, except for turnovers. Mullen lets off the gas in a win. Freeze is always trying to catch up.
 

cofreb

Redshirt
Oct 6, 2009
159
33
28
SEC-Only Stats

to strip out the non-conference noise. All in all they are very close, especially considering the disparity in Eastern division opponents, with the only decided edge going to MSU in ppg allowed.

Offense:

UM: 378 ypg (268 passing/109 rushing), 26.1 ppg; Wallace QBR 132.5; 3rd Down Conversions 40.5%
MSU: 384 ypg (261 passing/123 rushing), 25.4 ppg; Russell QBR 139.3; 3rd Down Conversions 33.3%

Defense:

UM: 399 ypg (246 passing/153 rushing), 30.7 ppg; Pass D Eff 139; 3rd Down Conversions 44.6%
MSU: 380 ypg (213 passing/167 rushing), 26.0 ppg; Pass D Eff 142; 3rd Down Conversions 44.1%

Turnover Margin:

UM: +3 (Fumbles +10/-4; INTs +7/-10)
MSU: +5 (Fumbles +8/-6; INTs +6/-3)
 
Last edited: