/
U UIUCDog Redshirt Aug 22, 2012 711 0 0 Sep 14, 2013 #2 Yep, absolute horseshit. Should not even have been a penalty. asdf
T The Usual Suspect Junior Sep 1, 2011 2,498 208 63 Sep 14, 2013 #3 Was that Brad Freeman with the call?
M MSUCowbell Redshirt Aug 31, 2013 101 0 0 Sep 14, 2013 #4 The Usual Suspect said: / Click to expand... AWFUL!!! This Targeting rule is being used WAAAAY to liberally. These kids are trying to play a game called FOOTBALL here!!!!!!!!!!!
The Usual Suspect said: / Click to expand... AWFUL!!! This Targeting rule is being used WAAAAY to liberally. These kids are trying to play a game called FOOTBALL here!!!!!!!!!!!
R RocketDawg All-Conference Oct 21, 2011 18,974 2,081 113 Sep 14, 2013 #5 Terrible call. Wasn't even close. That would be reason for a protest if there was such a thing. They're gonna have to modify that rule.
Terrible call. Wasn't even close. That would be reason for a protest if there was such a thing. They're gonna have to modify that rule.
C Cousin Jeffrey Redshirt Feb 20, 2011 754 13 18 Sep 14, 2013 #6 If you're going to take the time to review the play to either uphold or overrule the ejection, why not overrule the penalty as well? That makes no sense to still penalize a team when the review found that "there was no targeting foul."
If you're going to take the time to review the play to either uphold or overrule the ejection, why not overrule the penalty as well? That makes no sense to still penalize a team when the review found that "there was no targeting foul."
T The Usual Suspect Junior Sep 1, 2011 2,498 208 63 Sep 14, 2013 #7 Well it's going to take Bama getting screwed with this rule to get it changed!!! ...