Texas blaming national weather service

southerncaltiger

Active member
Mar 16, 2006
8,894
249
63
This maga congessional candidate knows the deal. This was dEeP sTaTe manipulated weather.




Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Hurricane Helene wasn’t caused by cloud seeding or geo engineering. It was a natural phenomenon formed due to natural conditions in the ocean and atmosphere, not human interventions. No technology exists to create or steer hurricanes. noaa.gov/news/fact-chec… science.feedback.org/humans-do-not-…. rand.org/pubs/commentar…
Do you find this helpful?

Yikes. Love it when people with zero academic cred AND zero work experience in the same subject matter area feel the need to weigh in on something like this. Of course, she also has a Ph. D. from some no-name school, so people will say “Oh, she’s a doctorate; she must know.”

Tell you what, I have an issue with early childhood education or counseling, I’ll seek your assumed-to-be-well-informed opinion. Anything environmental related? No, thanks, I’m comfortable with my own education & work cred.
 

Dadar

Member
Dec 21, 2003
3,165
86
48
Forecasting has improved significantly since 2019 I believe, but

URL unfurl="true"]https://www.collegetribune.ie/brazilian-butterflies-chaos-theory-and-the-weather-forecast/[/URL]
 

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,509
1,575
113
No one denies the climate changes.

Do we need to throw money at the climate because it changes? Absolutely not. The climate changed well before humans and it will continue to change well after humans are here. Humans are a very adaptable species and we will adapt.

Can anyone give us the basics? Where are we starting, what is the goal, and how will we get there?

What is the baseline ocean temperature? What is the ideal ocean temperature?

No one can answer those questions because climate science is a pseudo science that can not be measured. "Just trust us bro" is not science.
I'll use an example that might make sense to you. The fertile crescent, in the middle east was the "birth place" of agriculture. What is it now? Is ot a fertile oasis? Why? Think on it a bit.
 

PAWrocka

Member
Nov 3, 2008
20,686
51
38
I'll use an example that might make sense to you. The fertile crescent, in the middle east was the "birth place" of agriculture. What is it now? Is ot a fertile oasis? Why? Think on it a bit.
Ice age ended only a few thousand years before. Those Mesopotamian civilizations should’ve adopted EVs, worn a mask, got a booster shot, and understood that women can have penises.

Trust the science.

In all seriousness, this thread is gross.
 

johnhugh

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2003
73,979
2,310
98
Are you trying to say that as the planet gets warmer, biodiversity goes down? As the temperature rises, there will be less species on the planet?

Because when I look around me, life tends to thrive with heat.
Wow. I am jealous of the cocoon of ignorance you are able to live in. I mean that. The absolute privilege it must be to just wake up in La La land every day. Congratulations man. Seriously.
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,310
925
113
I'll use an example that might make sense to you. The fertile crescent, in the middle east was the "birth place" of agriculture. What is it now? Is ot a fertile oasis? Why? Think on it a bit.

thought about it. And climate change is still a scam.
 

other1

Member
Dec 9, 2004
14,402
57
48
“You are better than that”. No IT is not.

You always have to remember, politics is their religion because they don’t believe in GOD.
What does God have to do with anything??? If he was truly a factor this whole thing probably shouldn't have happened. And please, don't give me the "It's God's Will" BS
thought about it. And climate change is still a scam.
So what is to be gained by it being a scam??
 

other1

Member
Dec 9, 2004
14,402
57
48
Part of the plan to redistribute wealth, destroy the US and western civilization in order to usher in a global Marxist Utopia.

Not saying I agree or believe that, BUT that is what is gained by the “scam”.
Sounds rather far fetched to me. No doubt the "Deep State" must be involved!!
 

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,509
1,575
113
Oh that fear mongering bullsh!t?
Climate change is a giant scam.
What's so funny is how propagandized you are. The oil companies have done a number on you. You still think smoking doesn't cause cancer too?
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,310
925
113
What's so funny is how propagandized you are. The oil companies have done a number on you. You still think smoking doesn't cause cancer too?

You still think the food pyramid is healthy? You still think Covid vaccines are a good thing for healthy kids?

You won't answer this. How do you measure climate change?
 

PalmettoTiger1

Active member
Jan 24, 2009
10,571
147
63
Given the amount of technology available to the science of Meteorology (data, sophisticated numerical models, AI, etc.) tell me again why in 2025, their ability to predict weather events, even a few hours ahead of time, seems to be so poor?

Their level of inaccuracy would be deemed unacceptable in so many other science or engineering fields.

Same as with the Air Traffic Control System

I was advocating from my cheap seat many years ago to upgrade it

Along with my other passions like in power stop with the green deal and go Nuclear

My religion is common sense

Practice it every day
 

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,509
1,575
113
You still think the food pyramid is healthy? You still think Covid vaccines are a good thing for healthy kids?

You won't answer this. How do you measure climate change?
The thing about science silly is that it can change. Nutritionists continue to research health and food and update their findings. The thing with epidemiology is that it is dealing with large scale outbreaks, not your personal health, so don't confuse yourself too much with it.

How do I personally measure climate change? Well I'm not a meteorologist or a scientist. So, I don't know why the hell you are asking me that. I certainly have read some things on the matter though.
 

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,509
1,575
113
Money and behavior.

It is certainly not control of the climate :ROFLMAO:
Who's the largest benefactor of your outlook? OIL COMPANIES. Did you know that all the naysaying research on climate change has been funded by Exxon and BP? Did you know that?
Did you know they have more money than god? They have been fabricating this narrative for quite a long while.
Did you know that BP overthrew the government in Iran in the 50's to get access to their oil fields? Did you know that? Conservatives ******* love a good conspiracy, except when they are the rubes of one.
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,310
925
113
The thing about science silly is that it can change. Nutritionists continue to research health and food and update their findings. The thing with epidemiology is that it is dealing with large scale outbreaks, not your personal health, so don't confuse yourself too much with it.

How do I personally measure climate change? Well I'm not a meteorologist or a scientist. So, I don't know why the hell you are asking me that. I certainly have read some things on the matter though.
Ok well what have you read? How do you measure climate change?

Where is the starting point, what is the goal?

Its a pseudo science
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,310
925
113
Who's the largest benefactor of your outlook? OIL COMPANIES. Did you know that all the naysaying research on climate change has been funded by Exxon and BP? Did you know that?
Did you know they have more money than god? They have been fabricating this narrative for quite a long while.
Did you know that BP overthrew the government in Iran in the 50's to get access to their oil fields? Did you know that? Conservatives ******* love a good conspiracy, except when they are the rubes of one.
Why do you think i like Oil companies? I have exactly zero investments in oil companies and my last two car purchases have been teslas.

IDGAF about oil companies. I care about the truth. The truth is that climate science is pseudo junk science.

What is the hypothesis? The climate changes? No **** sherlocks.
 

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,509
1,575
113
Why do you think i like Oil companies? I have exactly zero investments in oil companies and my last two car purchases have been teslas.

IDGAF about oil companies. I care about the truth. The truth is that climate science is pseudo junk science.

There is no baseline, no stated goal. That is not science.
You should learn enough to know you don't know enough to make a claim like that.
 

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,509
1,575
113
Ok well what have you read? How do you measure climate change?

Where is the starting point, what is the goal?

Its a pseudo science
How many times do I have to tell you: I'm not paid to teach you. Your opinions suck, and are under informed. Go do better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,310
925
113
Your outlook was fed to you by the oil companies. You are a walking talking mouth piece of corporate propaganda.
Yawn.

Oil companies. Russia. High grocery prices. Inflation. What is your next fear mongering boogeyman? You are a clown.

Climate science is a pseudo science. Common sense tells us this, we don't need an oil companies opinion.
 

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,509
1,575
113
Yawn.

Oil companies. Russia. High grocery prices. Inflation. What is your next fear mongering boogeyman? You are a clown.

Climate science is a pseudo science. Common sense tells us this, we don't need an oil companies opinion.
You are so damn boring man. Trump won on groceries, his words. Russia? idk what you are even trying to say. Boogeyman? Oh you mean stuff you don't understand but claim authority to render opnions on, cool yah.
You don't understand science, I get it man. Its why you were an easy target for their propaganda. Which you have injested and spit back out and call it 'common sense'. derp
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,310
925
113
You are so damn boring man. Trump won on groceries, his words. Russia? idk what you are even trying to say. Boogeyman? Oh you mean stuff you don't understand but claim authority to render opnions on, cool yah.
You don't understand science, I get it man. Its why you were an easy target for their propaganda. Which you have injested and spit back out and call it 'common sense'. derp
I understand science starts with a hypothesis, you test the hypothesis, and then draw a conclusion.

Whats the hypothesis tough guy? The climate changes? lol
 

Weapon_X

Member
Jul 28, 2018
503
243
43
Who's the largest benefactor of your outlook? OIL COMPANIES. Did you know that all the naysaying research on climate change has been funded by Exxon and BP? Did you know that?
Did you know they have more money than god? They have been fabricating this narrative for quite a long while.
Did you know that BP overthrew the government in Iran in the 50's to get access to their oil fields? Did you know that? Conservatives ******* love a good conspiracy, except when they are the rubes of one.

This guy is going to pretend that there isn't literally billions of dollars being made pushing the climate hoax narrative for many reasons. Another useful idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

PalmettoTiger1

Active member
Jan 24, 2009
10,571
147
63
I agree…so tragic. Close friends in San Antonio have been updating us. The rate of rise for the river was stunningly fast from the info I’ve seen.

In South Carolina in 2015 we had 1000 year floods which did the same in the Midlands

Massive rain Dam failures Flooding of houses built in low areas

People in houses were facing water riding feet by the minute

Same as Texas
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,310
925
113
The CEO of the cloud seeding company and the guy who did the actual cloud seeding has been very active on Twitter. There is a long and in my opinion very productive conversation about what happened.

He claims what they did would not be able to have that kind of effect and is 0% responsible for the flood. I appreciate his efforts to be forthright and out in the open.

He does admit to cloud seeding in the general area 2 days before the floods. He does not think it had anything to do with the floods. It's a good conversation. Augustus Doricko is his name.

@UrHuckleberry