Congrats to the teams in the NCAA tournament....representing the ACC. The best conference in college basketball.
The ACC.... the best college basketball conference
- Thread starter jalovell23_rivals51175
- Start date
I think it is funny how many of the talking heads were saying all year that the SEC and the B1G were the best conferences. The ACC was down this year even people on this board were saying it. Now look at me now, I wonder what all those critics are saying now.
Even if it’s the Tobacco Road Mafia, it’s still shooting the “double birds” at the $EC and the Big 10+4..
Actions speak much louder than words! ACC making it clear once again that it is the very best basketball conference in the country.
Nobody is taking a trophy we are just talking up the conference like SEC fans do in football. We had a bad year and with everything going on made it worse. All our detractors made the argument we are having a bad year in a weak conference. Guess what it wasn’t a bad conference after all. No it doesn’t mean we had fewer losses but it does mean we lost to good teams.
Nope. It only matters if you
Play for a team that makes the tournament not if you’re just in the same conference. What St Peters was in the third best conference?
It’s about $$$$. They win we win. This year 220 million $ is up for grabs and a portion of that goes to the ACC, which is divided between the members.
It’s based on the number of units each conference acquire and that’s determined by the number of teams in the tournament and it increase with each win, so yes it pays to cheer on our conference members. Literally
In hindsight, I am not so sure it was a down year for the ACC. Miami, ND, Duke and UNC success is not some strange coincidence.
Aside from the timing, specifically between the regular season vs the tournaments; one could argue based on this tournament, that both the BIG10 and the SEC had “down years”. If these conference tournaments can have that much more influence in NCAA qualification over regular season performance ……then why not use the NCAA tournament as the ultimate determination as to which conference was actually up or down?
Aside from the timing, specifically between the regular season vs the tournaments; one could argue based on this tournament, that both the BIG10 and the SEC had “down years”. If these conference tournaments can have that much more influence in NCAA qualification over regular season performance ……then why not use the NCAA tournament as the ultimate determination as to which conference was actually up or down?
I know they based the ACC being down on our losses to other P5 teams early, yet they seem to make excuses for the other conferences losses in the tournament when teams should be playing their best.
Evan Bilas was trash talking the ACC using Pitt, CUSE, GT, and us as examples since we all had losing records. Sure those programs were down, but every conference has teams that are down. Obviously our top performing teams are better than the top SEC and Big 10 teams. Just a bunch of BS excuses for them to save face