It really should not be difficult. This is about revenue sharing so which sports create revenue. As for NIL in women’s sports it tends to gravitate to a few well known athletes and not much for everybody else.Female athletes appeal landmark NCAA settlement over back pay | AP News
Imagine a scenario wherein female athletes sue for "equal comp", and win (which is a very real possibility)
and
Football / Mens BB athletes sue for a "fair" slice of the pie - meaning "most of it", since their sports generate the money, and win (which is a very real possibility)
Then what?
And this is just the beginning.
This is how I expect things to play out. The market will dictate.It really should not be difficult. This is about revenue sharing so which sports create revenue. As for NIL in women’s sports it tends to gravitate to a few well known athletes and not much for everybody else.
That is debatably true.It really should not be difficult.
I’m speechless.Unmitigated f*cking disaster.
I expect that we will see a lot of these misunderstandings.
![]()
Wisconsin sues Miami for tampering with transfer
Wisconsin has filed a lawsuit claiming that the Miami football team broke the law by tampering with a Badgers player.www.espn.com
![]()
![]()
Trump issues executive order for college sports
President Donald Trump has directed members of his Cabinet to develop a plan in the next 30 days aimed at preserving college sports opportunities and preventing college athletes from becoming professionals.www.espn.com
The EO mentioned ensuring deals reflect rel market value. Trump’s the king of manipulating markets to increase value. Colleges can just do the same thing!Started to reply in the other thread but it got nuked it seems; anyway, agree with @WestSideLion - EO's do not have any real teeth. To make serious reform in college athletics will require congress, and those guys are all looking out for their own states/constituents. I think the settlement was a good place to start but as we're seeing there are still a bunch of unknowns/hurdles/loopholes. College football probably needs to be removed from universities and set up as minor/pro leagues with university affiliations. There needs to be a better way to ensure a level playing field (not just who has the most money to buy talent). Will this ruin the sport? The spirit and university pride people have - for sure. Popularity? Unlikely IMO. But, this whole EO is mostly grandstanding. My guess is Saban has Trump's ear and wants to get things back to the way they were (and with the schools/NCAA having all the power) becuaes Saban sees the writing on the wall for the SEC - they can't sustain the kind of money the Big Ten can (save Texas) in this environment because of the truth Cowherd speaks here...
"What’s changing is money," he continued. "Big Ten schools are bigger, they have more graduates. It’s easier to raise money for NIL. You add in Phil Knight and the Nike money. You add in USC and the LA economy money… Big Ten money is Hollywood, tech, and financial centers. There's a lot of car dealerships in the SEC."
Started to reply in the other thread but it got nuked it seems; anyway, agree with @WestSideLion - EO's do not have any real teeth. To make serious reform in college athletics will require congress, and those guys are all looking out for their own states/constituents. I think the settlement was a good place to start but as we're seeing there are still a bunch of unknowns/hurdles/loopholes. College football probably needs to be removed from universities and set up as minor/pro leagues with university affiliations. There needs to be a better way to ensure a level playing field (not just who has the most money to buy talent). Will this ruin the sport? The spirit and university pride people have - for sure. Popularity? Unlikely IMO. But, this whole EO is mostly grandstanding. My guess is Saban has Trump's ear and wants to get things back to the way they were (and with the schools/NCAA having all the power) becuaes Saban sees the writing on the wall for the SEC - they can't sustain the kind of money the Big Ten can (save Texas) in this environment because of the truth Cowherd speaks here...
"What’s changing is money," he continued. "Big Ten schools are bigger, they have more graduates. It’s easier to raise money for NIL. You add in Phil Knight and the Nike money. You add in USC and the LA economy money… Big Ten money is Hollywood, tech, and financial centers. There's a lot of car dealerships in the SEC."
The EO mentioned ensuring deals reflect rel market value. Trump’s the king of manipulating markets to increase value. Colleges can just do the same thing!
Let’s see your pic*Who died and allowed this creature to decide the fate of college athletics?
“She” allegedly attended law school at UC Berkeley…..that might explain some things.
View attachment 814183
I totally disagree with this. Contrary to what many believe, Joe was never about the players being locked in the library 24/7. While he certainly felt education was important, he also looked at the college experience as time for personal growth as opposite to being isolated on an athletics island on campus. Joe had players spend freshman year in dorms with other students. He was also one of the first people advocating for players to receive some sort of stipend since they weren’t allowed to work. He was ridiculed for this and the idea was likely shot down by those who had become adept at sliding the bag under the table.If Joe was alive and in his prime or late-prime, it would have been him that PDJT turned to.
Stipends to Joe were pizza/date money. Not money that would rival NFL rookie contracts.I totally disagree with this. Contrary to what many believe, Joe was never about the players being locked in the library 24/7. While he certainly felt education was important, he also looked at the college experience as time for personal growth as opposite to being isolated on an athletics island on campus. Joe had players spend freshman year in dorms with other students. He was also one of the first people advocating for players to receive some sort of stipend since they weren’t allowed to work. He was ridiculed for this and the idea was likely shot down by those who had become adept at sliding the bag under the table.
Joe was much more progressive than he’s given credit for. He was in favor of a stipend back when the money was peanuts compared today. There’s no way to know what he would think today’s players deserve.
So, now we like Saban? When he/Bama was/were paying players under the table, he was a sheister, now he’s going to save “college football”? Color me skeptical.![]()
Nick Saban reacts to President Donald Trump's executive order relating to college sports
Ex-Alabama coach Nick Saban praised President Donald Trump's recent executive order that "Saves College Sports" for focusing on education.www.on3.com
You can put your politics aside and consider this as a positive. I do not hold out much hope that anything can be done, but only a guy like Saban and a team of comparable leaders can do it.
So, now we like Saban? When he/Bama was/were paying players under the table, he was a sheister, now he’s going to save “college football”? Color me skeptical.