Rev, you just keep reaching. Here’s a couple simple, easy to answer questions:
Perhaps you misread my post. I did not bring up the kidnapping. Keep launching criticism at the things I don't say.
Flynn isn’t supporting violence. You really don’t get it. Your liberal blinders are on, and you just can only get so far before the victim mentality in you comes out. What a lot of Trump supporters feel is that the election was stolen, and the media and Establishment are doing anything they can to get back power. Yes, I am one of those. But you won’t find the majority of the supporters promoting violence. They’re mad as hell, but if Trump says stand down, that’s what they will do.
The Supremes very rightly don’t want to step in this mess of delusional conspiracies drummed by people unable to face facts. That is a good thing. Voting is a political issue and with one or two exceptions the Supremes are supposed to stay out of it. They took such a beating after Bush v. Gore that when Scalia spoke at various institutions, he refused to answer any questions about the case.
Well. I did misread your post. And I apologize. How many people were injured in the Michigan protests?
I am not sure how that is relevant. Thankfully none but the visual of a militia of men with some serious fire power heading to the state capitol should frighten every single American
It is definitely not something that I support happening and it has terrible optics. Not sure in what way it helped their cause.
Men not wanting to take orders from women is one of those truths imbedded in the fabric of our society. And i love the way you grudgingly called the militia Trump supporters. They were out there because Trump told them not to take the lock doen order lying down. As far ad the riots associated with the BLM protesters, i do believe that most of them were not part of the protests but took the opportunity to break into stores and loot. But that is not because i just conjured that up. I also read a great deal about it.
You can say that men not wanting to take orders from women is "impeded in the fabric of our society" and there is historical truth to that. But you can't say that THIS is an example of that. You're just being lazy by making the assertion.
Morris clearly does not understand the basics of jurisdictional requirements or he never would have made some of the statements he does in this little piece of nonfactual fluff. As far as a shot across the bow, it was directed at the Republicans who basically stole one seat during the Obama administration and then rammed through another justice right before an election.
Posts like this one you just made are the reason this site should drug test every poster.
Did you watch the video? Please watch the video and then give me your opinion on this specific incident.
I watched it. I recognize the problem with getting two year olds to do anything but they are not the first couple to have this happen to them. I am not sure what you would have the airline do. Update: United refunded their tickets and returned their luggage and baby seat to them. Also, according to United, the family is not banned for life.
Tamir Rice? Give me a break. I think that was tragic and shouldn't have happened. I don't remember the conversation with you about it, but how does this compare? And I am not saying that immigration has anything to do with this family being "inconvenienced". I am saying that you guys demand TWO year olds to comply with a company's policy (which the parents did everything in their power to do) but you don't demand adults to comply with our country's LAWS in regards to immigration.
If you want to go down the immigration road, then how do you support the current president who was well known for hiring undocumented immigrants to work on his various real estate projects?
I think the issue is that you keep mixing apples and oranges in your effort to accuse us of being hypocrites. But given that you support someone who has routinely flouted those rules, it seems fair to call out your hypocrisy as well. Perhaps you could just stick to the topic at hand.
