Great day for all you pedophiles out thereGood news… a black woman is now on the Supreme Court. I bet everything wrong with the country will be fixed immediately
Great day for all you pedophiles out thereGood news… a black woman is now on the Supreme Court. I bet everything wrong with the country will be fixed immediately
If you’re trying to be the biggest bigot in this thread, keep making posts like this. You have some nerve.Good news… a black woman is now on the Supreme Court. I bet everything wrong with the country will be fixed immediately
Yup. The South African racistI just heard today that since Elon Musk has the most shares of twitter that he now has become a racist.
That chick he’s with seems different. I don’t get itYup. The South African racist![]()
Well, isn’t he African American??Yup. The South African racist![]()
Huh??
Huh??
"We" being Americans, yes, we did.You may have TJ, but WE didn’t.
"We" being Americans, yes, we did.
Tell us how all the divisiveness in America is the fault of Democrats and how you're so above it, mac...
Thank you for the eloquent explanationlol That was a really unfortunate place for his stutter to happen: "America can be defined by one word... iwakflibitdeuh."
Thank you for posting this 18-second excerpt of a 17 minute speech. That carefully selected clip of less than 2% of the President's speech, chosen for no other reason than for confirmation bias, starts at 15:29. Uncoincidentally, almost exactly where the excerpt ends, the President gets back on track and completes a coherent story leading up to the one word he was getting at. (It's "possibility," for those afraid to discover context themselves.)
No, we didn’t. Cheating happened. Just too many powerful people behind it. On the matter of division in the country? Our power players want us divided, and the majority of them are Democrats, led by this joke of an administration. Biden is getting worse. He needed to be in a nursing home years ago. It’s beyond sad to watch him now."We" being Americans, yes, we did.
Tell us how all the divisiveness in America is the fault of Democrats and how you're so above it, mac...
Not all, but the majority. Whether its race, religion, sexual preference, gender or wealth ever democratic position is framed to pit us against each other. The wealthy dont pay their fair share, your race doesnt let you get ahead, the religions dont respect you as a person etc etc etc...if you take a position against anything the democrats promote you are immediately cast into a name-calling category of one sort or another....racist, homophobe, xenophobe, facist etc....and that is divisive....Tell us how all the divisiveness in America is the fault of Democrats.
Bull ****"We" being Americans, yes, we did.
Tell us how all the divisiveness in America is the fault of Democrats and how you're so above it, mac...
Ummm... no, if you take a position against what is just you get correctly labeled as something. It's cause and effect. I thought the GOP was the party of "personal responsibility." Well... take responsibility: If you oppose the legal right of gay people to get married and reap the benefits of that under law -- not in your place of worship, but all the govt benefits under law -- you support discrimination based on sexual orientation. That is a pretty textbook definition of bigotry. Where bigotry has to do with sexual orientation, we call the person doing that a h-o-m-o-p-h-o-b-e or a b-i-g-o-t. It's not name-calling; it's accurate labeling. It's not "a position against ANYTHING"; it' s not "IMMEDIATELY cast." There's a clear and accurate cause and effect.Not all, but the majority. Whether its race, religion, sexual preference, gender or wealth ever democratic position is framed to pit us against each other. The wealthy dont pay their fair share, your race doesnt let you get ahead, the religions dont respect you as a person etc etc etc...if you take a position against anything the democrats promote you are immediately cast into a name-calling category of one sort or another....racist, homophobe, xenophobe, facist etc....and that is divisive....
I am sure you will say the right do it too...so lets hear the examples.
Ummm... no, if you take a position against what is just you get correctly labeled as something. It's cause and effect. I thought the GOP was the party of "personal responsibility." Well... take responsibility: If you oppose the legal right of gay people to get married and reap the benefits of that under law -- not in your place of worship, but all the govt benefits under law -- you support discrimination based on sexual orientation. That is a pretty textbook definition of bigotry. Where bigotry has to do with sexual orientation, we call the person doing that a h-o-m-o-p-h-o-b-e or a b-i-g-o-t. It's not name-calling; it's accurate labeling. It's not "a position against ANYTHING"; it' s not "IMMEDIATELY cast." There's a clear and accurate cause and effect.
The right calls the left all sorts of things. It's on full display in this thread nearly every day. I'm cursed if I do; cursed if I don't here: If I list those ways, I'll get called a whiner and have 4-5 responses for each example arguing and dismissing it; if I don't list them, I get told it's b/c I can't or b/c I'm scared. I'm not invested enough to waste my time, so the latter is the easy choice.
The left is incompatible with you. You're not objective.The left is not exclusively divisive. But they are the biggest culprits without any objective argument. The left aren't exclusively whiners, but they are by far the whiniest. Without any objective argument. The left aren't exclusively victims, but they are easily the worst at claiming to be victims. Again, without any objective argument.
The left relies heavily on sensationalism and false narratives on social issues in a direct effort to divide society. The right isn't some moral high ground by any means and has its own flaws and divisive actions. But when comparing, it's not close. The left is the worst.
Hoho! And you just proved MY point!The irony of your reply is that it proves my point
I noticed that you didn't objectively refute anything I said. But you are right about the left being incompatible with me. They are repulsive as a whole. Not each individual, but as a whole.The left is incompatible with you. You're not objective.
You made no objective argument to refute. You just claimed it was true.I noticed that you didn't objectively refute anything I said. But you are right about the left being incompatible with me. They are repulsive as a whole. Not each individual, but as a whole.
The argument is that the left divides more, whines more and plays victim more. The challenge was to objectively argue against that. I don't blame you for avoiding the challenge.You made no objective argument to refute. You just claimed it was true.
This is rich. Kind of like you’re responding to yourself.See how lame that is just to claim it w/o addressing any actual content?
It.The argument is that the left divides more, whines more and plays victim more. The challenge was to objectively argue against that. I don't blame you for avoiding the challenge.
Like I said. I don't blame you for not trying.It.
Isn't.
Objective.
For.
Either.
Of.
Us.
Tell me how using religious beliefs to justify extending government benefits to one group but not another is constitutional.This is rich. Kind of like you’re responding to yourself.
It's still a pretty big deal based on some questions Judge Jackson fielded in her Senate hearing.Same sex marriage isn't going anywhere and most conservatives don't care anymore. Why are we still worried about simple opinions based on religious beliefs?
Were you worried we were going back to the prohibition days based on some of the questions Kavanagh was asked?It's still a pretty big deal based on some questions Judge Jackson fielded in her Senate hearing.
You're going to pull something, reaching like that.Were you worried we were going back to the prohibition days based on some of the questions Kavanagh was asked?
Looks like you need another mental health breakHoho! And you just proved MY point!
See how lame that is just to claim it w/o addressing any actual content?
We all see how lame it isHoho! And you just proved MY point!
See how lame that is just to claim it w/o addressing any actual content?
Well it IS free for certain people
Have never seen a group so afraid of free speech.
They’d piss their pants in excitement if it was Soros and not Musk.
Have never seen a group so afraid of free speech.
Datts still on a break. His less articulate sidekick Devada has already given me the business today. I may never fully recoverThey’d piss their pants in excitement if it was Soros and not Musk.
They’re all a bunch of pathetic pu**+%#.
Looking at you Datt.