Instead of giving a thoughtful response, you did what I figured you’d do. You refuse to acknowledge racism has improved, that the decay of the family plays a huge part, and that minorities have a lot more opportunities than they used to. Instead, you take the low road.
You libs really don’t want things better. All you’re after is finding problems, and assigning blame.
Uhh... I guess I'll repeat myself:
The decay of the family hasn't happened in a vacuum, so acting as if it's a question of character and morality doesn't have any effect other than to marginalize people.
(As in, it's not enough to say "decay of the family" if that's just a dogwhistle for attributing it to personal failings and washing your hands of it. As in, you have to look at contributing factors.)
There's a pretty huge chasm between "not near as bad as it used to be" and "like it's still 1960."
(As in, I don't like to downplay ongoing racism by going along with the idea that it's "not near as bad as it used to be," yet I'm also not claiming it's "like it's still 1960." As in, there are a whole, whole, whole lot of degrees between those two things, and I have neither the expectation nor the need for us to agree on where the present falls on that spectrum. As in, I was giving you an out. As in, I was taking a high road.)
Considering the extremist takes here about liberals and everything left of Senator Sasse being completely stupid, corrupt, evil, etc, why would you expect me to show any interest in discussing things on your terms?
(As in, look at how you just responded.)
I must have spent all my thoughtfulness on making sure I didn't make all kinds of generalizations and accusations against you, b/c, y'know, that's a really stupid thing to do if you're actually interested in bridging a divide.