Oh okay. You’re threatened by opposing viewpoints. Whatever you accuse us of is what you’re guilty of.
The New Lounge
- Thread starter hpnole
- Start date
Absolutely not true. There will not be a justification for that if it happens. I already stated that I don't agree with the use of the marines. You're being an ******* here.
You're being an ******* here, too. These are MY opinions.
No, I mean, I’m here, confronting opposing viewpoints all the time while y’all agree with each other.
Inflammatory remark to Ghost, followed by an insult of Mac. Your stock in trade.
You never put your foot down. You’ll find a new way to justify what our President does by the time it happens.
But you can’t do it in a civil way, which suggests you’re threatened in some way. Or maybe just insecure in your own beliefs which tracks since you’re always telling us how smart and humble you are.
If this was a far right nut job group protesting in the same manner that the protesters are in LA, you bet your *** I’d think the National Guard should be called in.
Protest peacefully. It’s not complicated.
Is Trump telling the truth that the national guard got the riots under control, or is Newsom telling the truth that the national guard hadn't even arrived yet? If Newsom was telling the truth, then he was lying when he blamed the national guard's presence on the unrest. And YOU repeated that lie. Because you have to blame the response for everything. Never the reason for the response.
As far as fake news Newsom, you don’t need a source past Newsom's own post where he lied about the troops having to sleep on the floor and without food. Sadly, he used a photo from a terrible day for our military where over 100 people died, including 13 U.S. servicemembers. And many more mutilated. All because our country was being run by morons. Tried to make Trump look bad, but just made Biden look like the potato everyone knew he was.
Doesn’t work that way.
I’ll say it clearly right off the bat.
I. Don’t. Think. Trump. Should. Have. Called. In. The. Marines.
However, that doesn’t mean that anything bad that happens after this decision was directly caused by this decision. That will be the narrative the Left will push if G-d forbid tragedy happens. When we point out the facts involved, we’ll then be accused of defending Trump’s decision.
Right. Don’t set cars on fire. Don’t drop bricks from an overpass on top of moving police cars. Basic.
I can’t even make sense of that. There isn’t enough Dramamine in the world for all the twists and turns you’re putting in that smoothie.
Gov Newsome… President Biden… Afghanistan… bad day…
I stand by what I said.
Pretty much. If the marines are attacked, they shouldn’t have been there. If they respond to being attacked, they didn't have the right to respond because they shouldn’t have been there. The hypothetical person wouldn't be held accountable for his violent actions by these looney lefties, Trump would be held accountable in their eyes.
Ignore my commentary on Biden's Afghanistan debacle.
Why are you purposely avoiding acknowledging my question on the national guard? Just say you were wrong.
The protesters are throwing what? Rocks? Is that what the Marines will do? Throw rocks back?
This is a deliberate escalation to justify whatever happens as a result.
If y’all don’t agree with the decision to send Marines into an American city, why not? Why not if not because you recognize the potential for escalation? And you’re already preparing to support the results, all while claiming you don’t support the decision.
Dropping bricks from an overpsss. A little more serious Molotov cocktails. Why does the Left always downplay violence when it’s politically convenient?
Maybe all democrats should survive a stroke. It might give them their brains back.
Whataboutism at its finest. Four years ago and many have been prosecuted. How many from the BLM riots have ever been charged? For arson, looting, you name it.
Good tweet John, but I have some bad news for you. Your party lost the moral high ground decades ago.
Okay. And the Marines will respond with what? Dropping rocks? Throwing Molotov cocktails? Equal force?
Or is it going to be like Kent St in 1970? (Hey! Look at that! Almost as far back as your b-b-but National Guard in Alabama, Forest!)
Why does the right always exaggerate violence to justify going overboard in their response?
Why not? The Marines haven’t been trained for this sort of thing, and they, to my knowledge, haven’t been called in for this in the past. If Presidents smarter and more rational than Trump haven’t seen fit to do this, then I question the decision right from the start
Prosecuted, convicted, sentenced… and pardoned.
Whataboutism? Like b-b-but LBJ sent the National Guard into Alabama?
You won’t see right wing groups destroying property, not obeying law enforcement…
Last edited:
And yet you’ll make excuses about how dropping rocks off a bridge requires shooting people, if it comes to that.
I would mention January 6th, but apparently our President’s having pardoned them a few months ago and y’all still talking about how Ashley Babbitt was the only real victim still means I’m bringing up something from over 4 years ago.
I’ve already said I don’t support the Marines being called in so I don’t feel the need to go further right now.
A stuttering joke? From a teacher? Really?
Using the name of a beloved fictional icon? And what purpose did that serve exactly?
I brought up the 65 example because a) it was in the article I linked and b) the narrative in the msm will be that this is the first time a Pres has ever federalized the Guard absent the Gov’s request.