that if he has success, and he likely will, his name will come up for every major coaching job there is. I've thought many times in the past that Stansbury
was a brilliant hire for MSU because he wins but, for whatever reason, he's not attractive to the major programs. When Sherrill was winning, the same applied.
State was able to build a successful program around both for a number of years, without the constant drama of "will he leave" every time a job opens up.
Don't get me wrong- I'd still hire Petersen in a minute if I were MSU and had a chance to get him. It would be a great coup for you guys. But there's no obvious connection there between Petersen and MSU, other than the relationship with the AD and that only goes so far. No loyalty to the university or to the people here. So congrats if you do get him, but mark my words: if he wins you will have to constantly put up with invasions of fans from major schools reporting that they will be going all out to hire your coach. We went through that with Tubby and it wasn't a lot of fun.
was a brilliant hire for MSU because he wins but, for whatever reason, he's not attractive to the major programs. When Sherrill was winning, the same applied.
State was able to build a successful program around both for a number of years, without the constant drama of "will he leave" every time a job opens up.
Don't get me wrong- I'd still hire Petersen in a minute if I were MSU and had a chance to get him. It would be a great coup for you guys. But there's no obvious connection there between Petersen and MSU, other than the relationship with the AD and that only goes so far. No loyalty to the university or to the people here. So congrats if you do get him, but mark my words: if he wins you will have to constantly put up with invasions of fans from major schools reporting that they will be going all out to hire your coach. We went through that with Tubby and it wasn't a lot of fun.