The resume - updated

615dawg

All-American
Jun 4, 2007
7,475
5,270
113
Everything that could have happened to help us yesterday happened. True, we almost blew it, but we didn't.

<span style="font-weight: bold;">RPI:</span> 57 (+7 spots from last game)
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Overall Record:</span> <span style="background-color: rgb(0, 153, 0);">18-7</span>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Strength of Schedule:</span> <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">116th</span>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Conference Record:</span> 6-4
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Conference Standing:</span> T-3rd overall, T-1st West
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Effective Conference Standing:</span> 5th
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Best Wins:</span> Old Dominion, Ole Miss, at Ole Miss
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Bad Losses:</span> <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">Rider</span>, <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">at Western Kentucky</span>, at Arkansas
<span style="font-weight: bold;">vs. RPI Top 25:</span> 0-1 (UK, UT remaining)
<span style="font-weight: bold;">vs. RPI Top 50:</span><span style="background-color: rgb(0, 153, 0);"> 3-2</span> (UK, UT remaining)
<span style="font-weight: bold;">vs. RPI Top 100:</span> 5-4 (UK, UT, ALA, USC remaining)

The Pecking Order:
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Conference RPI:</span> 4th
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Average Number of Teams Similar Conference RPI sends to NCAAT:</span> 5.8 (29 teams in last five years; Most: 7, Least: 4)
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Average RPI of Lowest At-Large Team from 4th RPI Conference: </span>55th (Highest: 72nd, Lowest 39th)

<span style="font-weight: bold;">Projected In:</span>
5 Kentucky (probable 1 seed)
16 Vanderbilt (probable 3-4 seed)
21 Tennessee (probable 4-5 seed)

<span style="font-weight: bold;">On The Bubble-In:</span>
45 Ole Miss (in the 9-10 range, needs to beat Vandy to solidify bid)
61 Florida (in the 9-11 range, but has a chance to play up with remaining games against UK, VU, UT)

<span style="font-weight: bold;">On The Bubble- Out:</span>
57 Mississippi State (win over UK puts them in the "in" bubble)
72 South Carolina (needs to probably go 5-1 in final 6 to get in)

<span style="font-weight: bold;">Games to Watch Next 7 Days:
</span>Kentucky at Mississippi State - Not a must win for MSU, but this is a big opportunity. Lose and USC and UT become myst wins.
South Carolina at Arkansas - Loss by USC probably eliminates them from any chance at at-large bid.
Vanderbilt at Ole Miss - Win by Ole Miss propels them to the "solid in" category
Auburn at Florida - a must win game for Florida
Florida at Ole Miss - Big game for both teams. A 2-0 week for UF or Ole Miss would put them solid in. An 0-2 week for either and they are out.
Tennessee at South Carolina - If USC beats Arkansas, a win over UT gets them back in the race for the final at-large bid. An 0-2 week for USC kills their chances, which is what we want. We do not want to go to Columbia and play an effective elimination game.
Mississippi State at LSU - Must win. If MSU were to beat UK, any jump in RPI or stature would be eradicated with loss to LSU. <span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">

</span></span></span>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Synopsis:</span> I think we need to have an RPI in the top 50 to get in. A 2-0 week puts us in the top 45, giving us room to slip up against USC or Tennessee. Just playing Kentucky will possibly raise our RPI by a spot or two even if we lose. Losing to LSU, Auburn or Alabama is not an option.
 

alabamadog

Redshirt
Oct 7, 2008
1,010
0
0
the way we lost was probably our worst loss of the season except for Rider, but as far as losing to a team we shouldn't have I would put Alabama before Arkansas. The Arkansas loss did hurt us more since we are tied with them in the West.
 

615dawg

All-American
Jun 4, 2007
7,475
5,270
113
Its a bad loss. WKU is the lowest RPI team we lost to, but they beat Vandy too, so you never know.
 

alabamadog

Redshirt
Oct 7, 2008
1,010
0
0
technically it is bad because of their rpi, but they obviously haven't been a bad team since Fortson returned.
 

615dawg

All-American
Jun 4, 2007
7,475
5,270
113
they may throw it out, but on the surface for seeding, it will hurt us.

I have us above USC, only because our RPI is 15 spots higher and we have three less losses and four more wins, but:

We have 3 quality wins, USC has five
We have 3 sub-100 losses, USC has one and its Boston College at 105. BC wins a couple games and USC has zero bad losses in the committee's eyes.

Comparing us to Marquette (a team we are similar with RPI-wise)
RPI:
MSU-57
Marquette - 56

Record:
MSU 18-7
Marquette 16-8

Conference Record:
MSU 6-4 in 4th ranked Conference
Marquette 7-5 in 2nd ranked conference

Bad Losses (sub-100)
MSU: 3 (WKU, Rider, ARK)
Marquette: 2 (DePaul, NC State

Top 25 RPI
MSU 0-1
Marquette: 2-5

Top 50 RPI
MSU 3-2
Marquette: 2-6

Top 100 RPI
MSU 5-4
Marquette: 4-6

Who does the committee pick? I say Marquette
 

topbulldawg

Freshman
Jan 27, 2008
524
83
28
I would say Marquette, but its very very close.

We need Louisville to lose today....a win on the road against Syracuse really helps their chances
 
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Basketball Bulldogs prepare to level up competition, starting with Xavier in neutral site meeting
  2. 02 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Who carries the load?
  3. 03 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Run vs. Run
  4. 04 Maroon and White Basketball Mississippi State 79-57 Troy: Bulldogs build big early lead in home win over Trojans
  5. 05 Maroon and White Football Kamario Taylor speaks on return to Mississippi State for 2027