I mean, the kid honestly should have won an oscar for his first ******* major motion picture role. His performance as Arnie was ******* amazing. Made tom hanks' attempt at playing someone with mental challenges a year later look like jessica simpson's acting career.He won't win the Oscar as long as people are tuning in to see if he wins an Oscar. Once there is someone to take his place as the "when is he going to win" guy, then he will be allowed to win.
Creed was a decent pic. It played all the familiar notes and used every cliche in the book. It's Hollywood. I liked the way Coogler shot it; had a grittiness reminiscent of the original Rocky. Outside of the look and Stallone, I thought it was a rather pedestrian effort. Didn't make my top ten.Give me Stallone for Supporting Actor. Creed was the best movie of the year, except for maybe Hateful 8. Tarentino always makes a good flick.
Also, he thought The Lone Ranger was a masterpiece.
As for Revenant, it was no Jeremiah Johnson. Turgid, self-consciously 'literary,' fashionably anti-American, and moving with the speed and surprise of a glacier. It probably will do well with the Oscars. It's Oscar bait. So was Crash. The embarrassment associated with Revenant will be the same as Crash in a few years.
Crash is the worst best picture winner of my lifetime. One of the all time best picture robberies.I'd watch the three movies you mentioned back-to-back-to-back before Id watch twenty minutes of the smug, sanctimonious dreck that was Crash. And Hollywood embraced it like The Magnificent Ambersons. Says all you need to know about the Hollywood culture.
Agree here...Movie was not that great..Very underwhelming actually.While I thought that Leo did a great acting job in The Revenant...the story just came off as a little to unbelievable for me. Any human would have died 1000 times over from hypothermia alone. I can believe surviving the bear attack but the exposure was a bit over the top.
Hustle and Flow or brokeback should have one.Crash is the worst best picture winner of my lifetime. One of the all time best picture robberies.
Brokeback was my pick that year. Phoenix was great, but it was a toss up for me because I love PSH. Phoenix will get his eventually. He is just too good not to eventually win.Hustle and Flow or brokeback should have one.
Also, Phoenix should have won for Cash.
Crash was terrible. They just weren't giving it to the others.
Hot take: kings speech was really good.
Crash is the worst best picture winner of my lifetime. One of the all time best picture robberies.
So was, as movie-making craftsmanship, A History of VIolence. In fact, the only two movies from that year I'll watch again if given a chance because they hold up as entertainment are Capote and Violence.Munich and Capote were better films that year.
Anyone remember Man in the Wilderness starring Richard Harris. It was also about Hugh Glass.The Wolf of Wall Street performance was such a stacked year. Maybe the best year for best actor nominees. I loved all of those performances.
Who is his ally? Did you mean alley? That would make more sense. Simple minds have trouble with simple words. Don't they, ape?I thought this would be right up your ally. Free stuff and all.
Shutter island was the most predictable movie ever. Not even 15 minutes in it was easy to know he was in the asylum. Wolf was amazing as was his performance in Django, considering the scene where he cut his hand on the skull was all a complete accident that he ad libbed through.I think the trailers look whack af and I have no desire to see it. Tired of Leo, tbh. Ain't done nothing really since Shutter Island.
^^ Is the quality for those downloads even remotely good? .
Leaked screeners. Movies like The Revenant and Hateful 8 need to be watched in theaters. Especially when one of them is offered in 70mm format. Watching a Chivo shot film on bluray isn't the same as seeing it on the big screen. Go to the theater people!the revenant came out in perfect dvd quality like a month before it was in theaters. same with hateful 8 and every other oscar hopeful trying to squeeze into 2015
It's not a nuanced performance. Visceral would be my best word to describe it. Different parts call for different techniques and tactics. You can't play this role subtle.I really liked the movie. I think DiCaprio will win, but I wouldn't put this in his top three performances. There just wasn't that much range on display. He's just a mountain man doing what he has to do to survive. There was so much more depth to his characters in The Departed (my favorite), Wolf of Wall Street and Catch Me If You Can.
The cinematography in The Revenant was incredible. Supreme Lord Z nailed it. I came out thinking that this film did to westerns what Saving Private Ryan did to war movies....rendered all others before it obsolete.
I agree with your first part, but disagree with the rest. I loved Hardy's performance. I thought it was his best outside of maybe Bronson and Locke. I still wouldn't say he stole the show. Did he have more lines? Sure. More lines does not a better performance make. Leo's performance was the more challenging performance and he pulled it off brilliantly. I also disagree about the dream sequences. I felt they were essential to the story. Almost all of them (some probably could have been left on the editing room floor) were expository. It was a convenient way to SHOW us back story without wordy exposition dumps.Agree with most others here. The cinematography is ridiculous, it's a new achievement in film. The story is meh, and Hardy steals the show. It's about 20 minutes too long all of which can be attributed to hallucination sequences of characters that no one cares about.
characters that no one cares about.
I thought Hardy was better than Leo. The onion summed it up perfectly.I agree with your first part, but disagree with the rest. I loved Hardy's performance. I thought it was his best outside of maybe Bronson and Locke. I still wouldn't say he stole the show. Did he have more lines? Sure. More lines does not a better performance make. Leo's performance was the more challenging performance and he pulled it off brilliantly. I also disagree about the dream sequences. I felt they were essential to the story. Almost all of them (some probably could have been left on the editing room floor) were expository. It was a convenient way to SHOW us back story without wordy exposition dumps.
Would have been a great help to Leo if he went mildly retarded imo.
Surprised me as well. Kid has a bright future. Every performance was solid.Tom Hardy was superb, in a film that is full of superb performances but this one is all about DiCaprio.
I'll tell you who surprised me more than anyone - Will Poulter. Kid put in a hell of a performance.