The Teflon Queen....
- Thread starter bornaneer
- Start date
When you set the parameters, you may classify it as fake. When logical citizens of this country see Hillary differently, there is nothing close to being fake outrage. Majority are pissed at the way the Teflon ***** smiles and slides.
Nah. I will post as I see fit and if you have a problem with it, it is your problem. Deal with it.
You're such a dumb ***....."Nah. I will post as I see fit and if you have a problem with it, it is your problem. Deal with it."
Last edited:
Its good that you are being honest today. Most of us have known for a long time that you "Have no clue".
Petraeus revealed the identity of secret agents. He revealed war plans. He lied to FBI officers. Jeez. He got to keep his retirement; he got off way too easy. And he was only fined $40 K, not $100 K.
What harm did it cause?.........Valerie Plame II........a big todo about nothing.
Dog, I am sure you have seen that "no clue" **** before. Every time he cannot come with an answer, that is his standard response. Occasionally he will get stuck and attempt to transfer with "but the REAL QUESTION IS". He is not real smooth with his transition. And he will always end up with "that is your problem". A piece of work in his own class and a few actually try to imitate? Go figure.
How many times does this have to be discussed before you warped minded idiots can realize fact from accusation? First all, this OP is stupid and should be taken for nothing more than humor. It is wrong as it is with Petreaus and it is wrong as it is to Hillary. The title of Teflon is a play on words by a moron that shouldn't use words more than one syllable.
If you are going to accuse Hillary of being made of Teflon, name one scandal where it has been proven she has broken a law or ethic standard that there is a distinct repercussion from the act? There isn't one. The email scandal is still under investigation and nothing other than the IG report saying that the creation of the server was not allowed from State Dept regulations. The IG doesn't have the power to indict or anything other than produce the report. You people are a bunch of right wing nuts that will criticize and persecute any Dem based on any story prematurely and to date that is what goes on here on an almost daily basis. Producing an accusation and then saying she is guilty is nothing more than an opinion. If the FBI or whoever produces a report that says something was done illegally like Petraeus, then you have a leg to stand on with your cricism and I will be right there with you. But until that time, you guys are just whining and acting like children like always.
If you are going to accuse Hillary of being made of Teflon, name one scandal where it has been proven she has broken a law or ethic standard that there is a distinct repercussion from the act? There isn't one. The email scandal is still under investigation and nothing other than the IG report saying that the creation of the server was not allowed from State Dept regulations. The IG doesn't have the power to indict or anything other than produce the report. You people are a bunch of right wing nuts that will criticize and persecute any Dem based on any story prematurely and to date that is what goes on here on an almost daily basis. Producing an accusation and then saying she is guilty is nothing more than an opinion. If the FBI or whoever produces a report that says something was done illegally like Petraeus, then you have a leg to stand on with your cricism and I will be right there with you. But until that time, you guys are just whining and acting like children like always.
Hell...... Slick Willey lied under oath and and it only raised his speaking fees.
I think you are trying to BS us again. She has admitted to removing emails that belonged to government. She has a difference of opinion on the items that were received or sent that did not have SECRET printed on them while they were in her possession. I think that those words she is so cautiously crafting as not being present are not required to be guilty of a felony. And the list goes on.
At this point, you have no more info on the legality in the matter than does the OP. You nor he are included inside the case investigation. You do not get to make the rules as to what has occurred and the legality or illegality of the case.
She may not be prosecuted, but that does not prove what happened. It only proves how crooked our government can be when politics are involved.
You can take the position to ignore the facts, but with very little effort the info is out there. Documents have been released that were on her private server that had CIA agents names redacted.
Bru you are willfully ignorant.
She and her husband have been running a criminal enterprise for decades. People aligned with the democratic party share her conduct and ethics that allow them to ignore her transgressions.
Democrats have indicated that even if indicted they would still vote for her, sad state of affairs.
Bru you are willfully ignorant.
She and her husband have been running a criminal enterprise for decades. People aligned with the democratic party share her conduct and ethics that allow them to ignore her transgressions.
Democrats have indicated that even if indicted they would still vote for her, sad state of affairs.
Priceless. And some of you smarter ones wonder why we make fun of the loonies on this board rather than attempt to have a serious conversation.
Whats with the we **** ? You ARE one of the loons.....I will say we have some intelligent libs on this board.....Country,RPJ,Whitetail,Mule.Cool and yes, Moe. Unfortunately you DID NOT make the cut......sorry.
glad you feel that way. I'm not a lib and not sure two of those you mentioned are either. You are too dumb to know what a liberal is. But knowing a moron like you think I am a loon, that just tells me I am right on track. Now, don't expect me to respond to you much. I don't converse with dumbasses on a regular basis anymore for the health of the board.
You must be joking......I never did....I get enough laughs already just reading what you post.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...e2ee06-dbd6-11e5-81ae-7491b9b9e7df_story.html
The analysis did not account for 22 emails that the State Department has withheld entirely from public release because they are “top secret,” the highest level of classification.
Hillary Clinton wrote 104 emails that she sent using her private server while secretary of state that the government has since said contain classified information, according to a new Washington Post analysis of Clinton’s publicly released correspondence.
Clinton’s publicly released correspondence also includes classified emails written by about 300 other people inside and outside the government, the analysis by The Post found.
The Post analysis is based on an examination of the 2,093 chains of Clinton’s email correspondence that the State Department decided contained classified information.
The agency released 52,000 pages of Clinton’s emails as part of a court-ordered process but blocked the sensitive information from public view. The Post identified the author of each email that contained such redactions.
The FBI is investigating the security of the server and whether Clinton or her aides mishandled classified information.
The analysis did not account for 22 emails that the State Department has withheld entirely from public release because they are “top secret,” the highest level of classification.
Hillary Clinton wrote 104 emails that she sent using her private server while secretary of state that the government has since said contain classified information, according to a new Washington Post analysis of Clinton’s publicly released correspondence.
Clinton’s publicly released correspondence also includes classified emails written by about 300 other people inside and outside the government, the analysis by The Post found.
The Post analysis is based on an examination of the 2,093 chains of Clinton’s email correspondence that the State Department decided contained classified information.
The agency released 52,000 pages of Clinton’s emails as part of a court-ordered process but blocked the sensitive information from public view. The Post identified the author of each email that contained such redactions.
The FBI is investigating the security of the server and whether Clinton or her aides mishandled classified information.
Exactly. I'm no Hillary fan, but a "criminal enterprise for decades"? In the words of Chris Berman, "C'mon man!" [laughing]
Hillary Clinton, from the moment her exclusive use of personal email for government business was exposed, has claimed nothing she sent or received was marked classified at the time.
But a 2012 email released by the State Department appears to challenge that claim because it carries a classified code known as a “portion marking” - and that marking was on the email when it was sent directly to Clinton’s account.
The “C” - which means it was marked classified at the confidential level - is in the left-hand-margin and relates to an April 2012 phone call with Malawi's first female president, Joyce Banda, who took power after the death of President Mutharika in 2012.
"(C) Purpose of Call: to offer condolences on the passing of President Mukharika and congratulate President Banda on her recent swearing in."
Everything after that was fully redacted before it was publicly released by the State Department -- a sign that the information was classified at the time and dealt with sensitive government deliberations.
A US government source said there are other Clinton emails with classified markings, or marked classified, beyond the April 2012 document.
But a 2012 email released by the State Department appears to challenge that claim because it carries a classified code known as a “portion marking” - and that marking was on the email when it was sent directly to Clinton’s account.
The “C” - which means it was marked classified at the confidential level - is in the left-hand-margin and relates to an April 2012 phone call with Malawi's first female president, Joyce Banda, who took power after the death of President Mutharika in 2012.
"(C) Purpose of Call: to offer condolences on the passing of President Mukharika and congratulate President Banda on her recent swearing in."
Everything after that was fully redacted before it was publicly released by the State Department -- a sign that the information was classified at the time and dealt with sensitive government deliberations.
A US government source said there are other Clinton emails with classified markings, or marked classified, beyond the April 2012 document.
Last edited: