That is the statue criteria at Auburn. Alabama only gives statues to coaches that win titles.
Anyone that thinks we should have the same statue criteria as Alabama and Auburn just doesn't like statues.
Cause once you set the bar at what Dak accomplished, several folks could jump over it without having something tangible (SEC west banner, for example).
What I wouldn't give for us to set the bar at Dak and then have that bar exceeded by a bunch of other players. If we were fortunate enough to run into that problem, we could just move the bar.
At this point, if you give Dak a statue... don't you have to consider giving Fitz one?
Did goat get ahold of your password? This is one of the more insanely idiotic things I've read in a long time. Fitz was great player for us, but Dak is on a completely different level and it goes way beyond raw stats. It's a combination of his stats, the number 1 ranking, multiple SI covers, the publicity, the overwhelming popularity with the fan base, what he's doing in the NFL, he's as famous and recognizable as any football player on the planet, he loves us back, he is probably going to bank over a quarter of a billion dollars over the next decade and could single handedly build us a football IPF, etc., etc......the sum of all of his parts put him far above any football player in our history and definitely make him worthy of a statue.
Now all that said, I think we should wait 6 or 8 years.....that way, when he is overwhelmed by the memories and outpouring of love at the unveiling, he will have a couple hundred mill on hand and can properly express his gratitude.