Based on those numbers, Mississippi & Vanderbilt are getting most bang for their buck. Texas & LSU getting least. Followed by Auburn & Georgia.I thought Ole Miss was spending bank?
If not 4x as much. Heck they may have spent that much on an unproven & so far very average QB.Yeah I have no idea if those numbers are accurate. But if we DID spend $15million, Tx spent 2x that.
I agree. Just like every NIL number we ever see. Total speculation.These numbers are pulled out of thin air. Nothing to see here.
They are, and then some, for them.I thought Ole Miss was spending bank?
Another loan?They are, and then some, for them.
I thought the revenue sharing hadn’t started yet?Point of order…..Every SEC team is spending at least $15 million on their roster, because that’s around the number allocated to football in the revenue share agreement.
What is implied by the graphic is that the numbers represent the 3rd Party / NIL money only. If the chart was accurate, MSU’s total roster investment of cash would be over $20 million, and that is before scholarships and other benefits are accounted for. Texas would be checking in at around $34 million.
You mean like the ones Goat and others throw out in posts on this board?These numbers are pulled out of thin air. Nothing to see here.
This is a major point with me tooCan someone explain to me why there is no transparency in the NIL.
No disclosed balance sheet, just give and don’t ask questions.
AgainCan someone explain to me why there is no transparency in the NIL.
No disclosed balance sheet, just give and don’t ask questions.
Believe nothing you hear and little that you see.
Just like the $15 million number being thrown around for us.These numbers are pulled out of thin air. Nothing to see here.
How do you know? List your sources.They are, and then some, for them.
Yea completely agree. No way those are legit. At least double for everyone including vandyThese numbers are pulled out of thin air. Nothing to see here.