This is what obstruction of justice looks like....
- Thread starter RichardPeterJohnson
- Start date
"which they both deemed to be inappropriate, according to two current and two former officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private communications with the president."
Why does the Washpo always use anonymous sources current and former officials to tell us what other people think? It would help if they got the facts right once in a while.
Now killing the leaker who stole your emails and gave them to wikileaks......now that seems wrong and that story has more named sources than the Washington Post has used this year.
I remember my first rodeo. Confirmation from multiple anonymous sources is SOP in Pulitzer Prize-winning journalism and has been for generations. Are you really that naive?
The crime of obstruction of justice, in United States jurisdictions, refers to the crime of obstructing prosecutors or other (usually government) officials. Common law jurisdictions other than the United States tend to use the wider offense of perverting the course of justice.
How exactly is that obstruction, if there is no collusion? What if they're only refusing to publicize what they know so far, because it's an ongoing investigation?
Ya'll keep acting like you've got this covered, when all you have is a pair of 4's.
Lol. They quoted people with 3rd person accounts and didnt even contact the people they discussed. You want to believe it and to you that makes it ok.
aren't you #hilliaryslosers tired of the fake news yet ?
how many of these stories in the 200 days since 'she' lost ?
lol...
how many of these stories in the 200 days since 'she' lost ?
lol...