since when? I can't remember anyone we've ever gotten from there. I remember Antonio White, a guy who didn't qualify from there, but that's about it.
I don't think that would have mattered last year, just like it wouldn't have mattered if the game had been in Starkville the year before.umrebel2009 said:If we're going with us having their schedule then we also would have MSU at home.<span style="font-weight: bold;"> Home team wins 9 out of 10 times, so count that as a win too.</span> So MSU, Ark, LSU, UK, Vandy, and 3-1 out of conference and we still end up with an 8 win season.rebel law said:We beat Ark, LSU, UK, Vandy, and go 3-1 with your non conference most likely. 6 or 7 wins. Regardless that's all hypothetical. Throw the egg bowl out the window. Yall whipped our ***. I don't think that makes Mullen a defacto better coach than Nutt just like Nutt beating Meyer doesn't make him a better coach obviously. Mullen is a good coach but if he can't figure out how to recruit better than I think he has a pretty low ceiling at MSU. The argument is the recruits won't come until we start winning but how are you going to start winning without the recruits? Yall have a good coach following a ****** recruiter. We have a good coach following a pretty good recruiter. World of difference. If Mullen adds a good recruiter, I think he will be on to something. Until then, I'm not sure how you get out of the 5th-6th spot in the west that Ole Miss and MSU are all too familiar with.
rebel law said:Until then, I'm not sure how you get out of the 5th-6th spot in the west that Ole Miss and MSU are all too familiar with.
TilloDawg said:Monday night straight out of rumor central.........
Supposedly, Mullen was visiting with the family, and brought up the KKK being on UM's campus and was really busting the Rebel's chops about it, whenThompson's dad spoke up and said it wasn't like that at all & was genuinely upset at Mullenabout portraying UM in a negative way....
If this has been brought up already, Sieg Hiel !
Is a smelly cologneTodd4State said:TilloDawg said:Monday night straight out of rumor central.........
Supposedly, Mullen was visiting with the family, and brought up the KKK being on UM's campus and was really busting the Rebel's chops about it, whenThompson's dad spoke up and said it wasn't like that at all & was genuinely upset at Mullenabout portraying UM in a negative way....
If this has been brought up already, Sieg Hiel !
than by going all character and morality on someone. Especially when other people do that crap to us.
Lion O said:I think he was somewhat addressing how Mullen, as well as this board, talked a month or so ago, especially after the Egg Bowl, about how MSU was whipping Ole Miss' *** in-state.
Meanwhile, OM will definitely sign 4 of the top 10, and possibly 5 (Coleman) of the top 10 in MS, while MSU signs 2, possibly 3 (Robinson) of the top 10.
OM will sign 4 of the top 6 rated JUCO players in MS.
I think, based on offers and ratings, that the out of state players that Ole Miss have added are at, worst, comparable to the other in-state players MSU has outside of the top 10.
jcbully said:What list are you looking at? Yancy's? We got Eulls, Carr, and Wells. You got Thompson, Bennet, and Martin. Robinson and Sanders are still out there. Say we split those. Then we still have 9 out of the next 15. Thats 13 out of the top 25. You have 4, and who would we trade for? Whos better on your commit list than those 13. So, yeah, we are dominating the state. You can't just pick and choose which group of recruits represents the state. Its the whole state. If you didn't want them, then okay, we did. You guys would take Eulls, Carr, Wells, Johnson, and Giles if they came calling. We lose one battle, and all of the sudden all those players we beat you out for didn't happen. We're still winning. Drink that in *****.
Todd4State said:Lion O said:I think he was somewhat addressing how Mullen, as well as this board, talked a month or so ago, especially after the Egg Bowl, about how MSU was whipping Ole Miss' *** in-state.
Meanwhile, OM will definitely sign 4 of the top 10, and possibly 5 (Coleman) of the top 10 in MS, while MSU signs 2, possibly 3 (Robinson) of the top 10.
OM will sign 4 of the top 6 rated JUCO players in MS.
I think, based on offers and ratings, that the out of state players that Ole Miss have added are at, worst, comparable to the other in-state players MSU has outside of the top 10.
C-L top 10:
Coleman- Auburn
Thompson- one for Ole Miss
Robinson- Probably MSU
Wells- one for MSU
Sanders- probably one for Ole Miss
Eulls- TWO for MSU (uh oh)
Dickson- LSU
Carr- THREE for MSU
Bennett- Two for Ole Miss, likely three with Sanders.
McNair, Jr.- Seriously CL? USM.
So, by my count, that's three for sure, probably four for MSU, and four at the absolute best for Ole Miss- with Coleman, who personally I don't think will go to Ole Miss. So the only way Ole Miss gets more guys is for Coleman to commit and for Robinson to not commit to State. More than likely it will be 4-3 State.
biguglykidjoe said:rebel law said:Yall whipped our *** that day. I wouldn't trade seasons or programs. MSU finished last in the West and is about to finish last in the West in recruiting. So without going all eggbowl.com on me, how does MSU get out of the cellar? <span style="font-weight: bold;">Mullen isn't a better coach than Nutt</span>, Petrino, or Saban. Maybe he's a better coach than Chzick or Miles but does it matter when they are signing far superior players? The easy answer is you have to sign better players but how do you sign better players without not finishing last and how do you not finish last without having better players? So again congrats on your big egg bowl win but where did it get you? Where's the momentum? Our fans love to make it bigger than it is, but in reality, the egg bowl only counts as one game.
It's a win for you? In the 8 completed years scout has kept up, Mississippians hav made up the majority of your classes 6 of those years - 2002 (16), 2003 (20), 2004 (11), 2005 (12), 2006 (9), 2007 (20), 2008 (14), 2009 (21). Where the <17> has it gotten you? One Liberty Bowl?jcbully said:If you guys had more commits from the top 25-30 then I'm sure we would be discussing a larger portion of the recruits on that list.
If we had more commits from the top 25-30? In that case, we probably would be looking at less success than we've had. Hidden gems aside, the recuits in that bracket are generally there for good and valid reasons.
jcbully wrote:_________________________________________________Whatever the case, we are winning the state over the last few years, and this year is no exception. The thing is, if we can get the lower rated guys that are just as good as your lower rated guys, and we are getting them in state then its a win for us because recruits are gonna notice that we are playing with MS boys and OM will take an out of state guy over an instate guy with arguably the same amount of talent.
Lion O said:as to the talent and who is most wanted in MS.
Like I already said, I used the Scout.com rankings, which is a mix of Steve and Yancy's rankings.
You could use Rivals rankings, but I don't buy them either due to having Johnson over Bennett, Wells, and Nick Parker and Nick Griffen. I think those 4, at worst two of the four, are superior players.
You are certainly free to disagree, and you may be right....guess we'll know in 2 or 3 years on most of these guys.
Let me help you out here. The only thing that matters is that your recruits are better than Auburn, Alabama, Arkansas, LSU, and Ole Miss. I don't give a flying %++$ what state they are from. I am pretty sure outside of Eulls, Wells, Carr, and Johnson that most of those players that yall are signing from Ms arent worth a +*+*!+# ****. This dominating in state recruiting argument is the most retarded argument yet.jcbully said:And yes, Bennet was in the final top 10 scout rankings. He was 9. My point was we are dominating the STATE of MS. Not the top 10. If you guys had more commits from the top 25-30 then I'm sure we would be discussing a larger portion of the recruits on that list. You've got 4 HS commits from MS, we have 13. Yeah, it may be a crapshoot outside of the top 10. But all of recruiting is a crapshoot. There aren't any can't miss prospects. Alot of these guys aren't rated as high because of exposure or politics w/in the rating systems. Whatever the case, we are winning the state over the last few years, and this year is no exception. The thing is, if we can get the lower rated guys that are just as good as your lower rated guys, and we are getting them in state then its a win for us because recruits are gonna notice that we are playing with MS boys and OM will take an out of state guy over an instate guy with arguably the same amount of talent.