Thoughts and updates of open practice

Mr Schwump

Heisman
Nov 4, 2006
29,563
23,097
18
But even if we switch to a 4-3 (which we are not)...presumably Elam plays a 2 technique along with Meant. Then who are their backups? Middleton and ????. Highly unlikely Kenegra is a 2 technique DT in a 4-3...and certainly not Bell, Miggins, etc..

Even presuming we'll go 4-3 not only still leaves us with the same problem as far as Elam's backup...but now you've also added the problem we don't have typical 4-3 DE on our roster (Ware, Bonner, Allen is closer than most), etc...

UK sticks with 3-4 alignment until passing downs arise.

Exactly.
 

WildCard

All-American
May 29, 2001
65,040
7,390
0
But even if we switch to a 4-3 (which we are not)...presumably Elam plays a 2 technique along with Meant. Then who are their backups? Middleton and ????. Highly unlikely Kenegra is a 2 technique DT in a 4-3...and certainly not Bell, Miggins, etc..

Even presuming we'll go 4-3 not only still leaves us with the same problem as far as Elam's backup...but now you've also added the problem we don't have typical 4-3 DE on our roster (Ware, Bonner, Allen is closer than most), etc...

UK sticks with 3-4 alignment until passing downs arise.
Totally agree with you and others regarding a "switch" to a 4 down front; that is not going to happen. However, FWIW, you seldom see a DT in a 2 tech in a 4-3 front. The DTs are almost always in 1 or 3 techs. Likewise, in UK's 3-4 front, like most 3-4 teams, the NT was frequently in a 1 tech.

Peace
 
Last edited:

BigBlueTuckian

Sophomore
Jan 9, 2016
309
198
0
Expect to get gashed at the point of attack on the ground. We just don't have the pieces in place to stop the run consistently with a 3 man front. We are going to have to do some ball control on offense with the spread passing game to protect the D.

This won't work. In order to play ball control you need to ram it down people's throats with your running game. UK doesn't have talent like Bama to run at will and control the clock. The minute the O sputters, the other team is playing ball control against our D who you just said will get gashed at the point of attack.

UK's best bet is to have an up-tempo offense that can scor quickly. Dare the other team to keep up. Get in a shootout. Otherwise the tables will get turned on us very quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sluggercatfan

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
This won't work. In order to play ball control you need to ram it down people's throats with your running game. UK doesn't have talent like Bama to run at will and control the clock. The minute the O sputters, the other team is playing ball control against our D who you just said will get gashed at the point of attack.

UK's best bet is to have an up-tempo offense that can scor quickly. Dare the other team to keep up. Get in a shootout. Otherwise the tables will get turned on us very quickly.
Some just don't get it if this offense dosen't produce 30-35+ ppg we are toast...this isn't your grandpa's game anymore
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
Gotta love the optimism of some of our fans in the spring. They see players out in the first practice and they're the best thing since sliced bread ever. Come October those names have faded.

Realistic goals, gang. Otherwise 7-5 may be a dissapointment to some of ya'

Being at the scrimmage, you can only tell what you see. Some young players looked good some didn't but it hard when you can't really blitz or touch some players. I didn't hear anyone at the game say that we looked like we were going to win the East and it was our first scrimmage. Most fans know that anything that you see now you take with a grain of salt.
 

BigBlueTuckian

Sophomore
Jan 9, 2016
309
198
0
Being at the scrimmage, you can only tell what you see. Some young players looked good some didn't but it hard when you can't really blitz or touch some players. I didn't hear anyone at the game say that we looked like we were going to win the East and it was our first scrimmage. Most fans know that anything that you see now you take with a grain of salt.

Bingo
 

RV

Heisman
Jun 26, 2005
8,089
13,585
0
There are more than a few that think our D-line will be a hot mess this fall. In truth they might but then again, they might be pretty decent.

As an example, Wisconsin had the number one statistical defense in the country and was #4 against the run in 2015. Their D-line depth chart was as follows:

DE
3* 5.7 Conor Sheehy So
NR Zander Neuville RFr 6-5 225lb walkon ran 4.8
3* 5.7 Billy Hirchfeld RFr

NT
3* 5.5 Arthur Goldberg RJr
3* 5.6 Olive Sagapolu Fr
3* 5.6 Jeremy Patterson RFr

DE
4* 5.8 Chikwe Obasih RSo
3* 5.7 Alec James RSo
3* 5.6 Kraig Howe Fr


Ours currently is as follows:
DT
2* 5.3 Regie Meant RSJr
2* 5.4 Calvin Taylor RSFr
3* 5.6 Adrian Middleton RSSo
3* 5.6 Kordell Looney Fr


NT
3* 5.6 Matt Elam Jr
2* 5.4 Naquez Pringle JucoJr
3* 5.6 Tymere Dubose RSSo

DE
2* 5.3 Courtney Miggins Sr
3* 5.6 Kengera Daniel So
3* 5.6 Alvonte Bell RSJr

Last year our run defense ranked 96. Now there's no way I'm saying our guys will be a top 10 run defense, nor even a top 50 run defense but they do have the chance to be adequate and with expected improvement in our offense, adequate might just be enough to go bowling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: un4getables

UKSanders_rivals37733

All-American
Jan 1, 2003
8,634
8,736
0
The best thing about that DL depth above is there are only 2 guys who will graduate this year, so depth (# of bodies) looks promising for 2017 and beyond. Obviously still have to find a pass rush, but that will likely be generated from the LB crew
 

Mr Schwump

Heisman
Nov 4, 2006
29,563
23,097
18
There are more than a few that think our D-line will be a hot mess this fall. In truth they might but then again, they might be pretty decent.

As an example, Wisconsin had the number one statistical defense in the country and was #4 against the run in 2015. Their D-line depth chart was as follows:

DE
3* 5.7 Conor Sheehy So
NR Zander Neuville RFr 6-5 225lb walkon ran 4.8
3* 5.7 Billy Hirchfeld RFr

NT
3* 5.5 Arthur Goldberg RJr
3* 5.6 Olive Sagapolu Fr
3* 5.6 Jeremy Patterson RFr

DE
4* 5.8 Chikwe Obasih RSo
3* 5.7 Alec James RSo
3* 5.6 Kraig Howe Fr

Ours currently is as follows:
DT
2* 5.3 Regie Meant RSJr
2* 5.4 Calvin Taylor RSFr
3* 5.6 Adrian Middleton RSSo
3* 5.6 Kordell Looney Fr


NT
3* 5.6 Matt Elam Jr
2* 5.4 Naquez Pringle JucoJr
3* 5.6 Tymere Dubose RSSo

DE
2* 5.3 Courtney Miggins Sr
3* 5.6 Kengera Daniel So
3* 5.6 Alvonte Bell RSJr

Last year our run defense ranked 96. Now there's no way I'm saying our guys will be a top 10 run defense, nor even a top 50 run defense but they do have the chance to be adequate and with expected improvement in our offense, adequate might just be enough to go bowling.

BTW, the architect of the Wisconsin D is at LSU now.
 

vhcat70

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
I wish we had a legit DC. Elliot has proved over and over he was not ready for the job. Hope this year will prove me wrong.
This is off base. Here we are talking about the practice & somebody changes the discussion to the coaching staff quality. I've been told this isn't allowed.
 

FilsonCat

All-Conference
Apr 5, 2007
2,882
3,099
0
This won't work. In order to play ball control you need to ram it down people's throats with your running game. UK doesn't have talent like Bama to run at will and control the clock. The minute the O sputters, the other team is playing ball control against our D who you just said will get gashed at the point of attack.

UK's best bet is to have an up-tempo offense that can scor quickly. Dare the other team to keep up. Get in a shootout. Otherwise the tables will get turned on us very quickly.
That just isn't true. Passing oriented spread offenses that mix in read option plays can be used to manage the clock. We are going to have to be creative to get the ball to playmakers in space.

My point is that a hurry up offense is great when changing the pace at intervals (a true 2 minute drill, etc.), but we need to try to limit the snaps the D will face through offensive pace and playcalling. I have zero confidence that our D will have improved at getting off of the field on third down.
 

3kidsandme

Heisman
Jan 12, 2013
7,345
10,353
0
The defense has shown improvement every single year. Year 4 will be no different. There was some really good defensive performances last year especially before melvin got hurt. The run defense will be solid with the additions of Love Kash and Laster. The secondary will force some picks with the length we have. No team in the sec shuts down running games every single week. UK will be no different the olines and backs in this league are NFL players. Even teams like Georgia Lsu Auburn etc get run on. We will have 10 games at the end of the year that we could win. I do believe we win more of those games this year than the last two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_7tbtqcx308nxh
Oct 1, 2001
5,199
1,898
0
The defense has shown improvement every single year. Year 4 will be no different. There was some really good defensive performances last year especially before melvin got hurt. The run defense will be solid with the additions of Love Kash and Laster. The secondary will force some picks with the length we have. No team in the sec shuts down running games every single week. UK will be no different the olines and backs in this league are NFL players. Even teams like Georgia Lsu Auburn etc get run on. We will have 10 games at the end of the year that we could win. I do believe we win more of those games this year than the last two.
A voice of reason.
 

BigBlueTuckian

Sophomore
Jan 9, 2016
309
198
0
That just isn't true. Passing oriented spread offenses that mix in read option plays can be used to manage the clock. We are going to have to be creative to get the ball to playmakers in space.

My point is that a hurry up offense is great when changing the pace at intervals (a true 2 minute drill, etc.), but we need to try to limit the snaps the D will face through offensive pace and playcalling. I have zero confidence that our D will have improved at getting off of the field on third down.

An offensive shootout forces the other team to pass. If the strength of our D is the secondary, and the other team has to keep up with fast scoring, there will be opportunities for 3 and outs and limited defensive series. This will make it easier on our D.

And yes, a spread offense can play some ball control assuming it has a good running game. Otherwise the opposing D won't respect it one bit. Then they can force us into 3 and outs.

One thing I've learned about football is you cannot hide your weaknesses on defense. A team that doesn't pass well will run (Ga Tech). A team that doesn't run well will pass (Boise St, Texas Tech). A team that can't stop the run will most definitely get gashed at the point of attack. This has been Kentucky football for the last 35 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jauk11

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,121
10,850
113
Ummm lets see:

"Eating people's lunches in the trenches."

Ummmm......nope. Elam is shining when he is able to take on a double team and not get pushed back. That frees up other defenders to make plays. He most certainly isn't "eating people's lunches in the trenches" unless we are taking the literal interpretation of that expression. I believe Elam will be a good player the next 2 years.

"Two really good QBs"

UK hasn't had a really good QB in forever. Really good QBs don't go 8-5. Really good QBs beat superior teams and win championships. Declaring a RS soph with 1.5 games of experience and a Grambling-via-JUCO transfer to be "two really good QBs" is nothing but blind homerism.

Again, everyone here wants UK to be successful, but setting unreal expectations on the first spring practice will only lead to eating out young on this message board come November.

First, you assume that I was there at practice and then continue on to cherry pick two statements to support your point. Second, you assume that I set unrealistic expectations when it is quite clear that I also pointed out deficiencies I read about on Twitter. A lot of assuming is happening here and it shows.
 

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,121
10,850
113
An offensive shootout forces the other team to pass. If the strength of our D is the secondary, and the other team has to keep up with fast scoring, there will be opportunities for 3 and outs and limited defensive series. This will make it easier on our D.

And yes, a spread offense can play some ball control assuming it has a good running game. Otherwise the opposing D won't respect it one bit. Then they can force us into 3 and outs.

One thing I've learned about football is you cannot hide your weaknesses on defense. A team that doesn't pass well will run (Ga Tech). A team that doesn't run well will pass (Boise St, Texas Tech). A team that can't stop the run will most definitely get gashed at the point of attack. This has been Kentucky football for the last 35 years.

I think we had some solid defense in the Hartline era, but I agree for the most part. UK needs to correct the basic issues that seem to have plagued us for decades.
 

jauk11

Heisman
Dec 6, 2006
60,631
18,638
0
I think we had some solid defense in the Hartline era, but I agree for the most part. UK needs to correct the basic issues that seem to have plagued us for decades.

And we would have had an outstanding one if not for the NCAA's stupid ruling on Jarmon. Peters had a great year with teams doubleteaming him all year, you have to wonder what he could have done if teams had to split the doubleteams with Jarmon, or let him run wild.
 

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,121
10,850
113
And we would have had an outstanding one if not for the NCAA's stupid ruling on Jarmon. Peters had a great year with teams doubleteaming him all year, you have to wonder what he could have done if teams had to split the doubleteams with Jarmon, or let him run wild.

I think that defense could have been legendary at UK.
 

anon_7tbtqcx308nxh

All-Conference
Jan 15, 2013
3,634
1,846
0
I think we had some solid defense in the Hartline era, but I agree for the most part. UK needs to correct the basic issues that seem to have plagued us for decades.

Last year's pass defense was comparable to that era. That may be even more impressive given how much more importance teams place on throwing the ball today than they did in the aughts. Rush defense has been worse than the Joker era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Levibooty

ukalumni00

Heisman
Jun 22, 2005
23,340
39,060
113
Stoops tenure at KY will solely fall in the hands of Gran and Hinshaw because if they cannot solve the offensive mess that has been at UK under his watch then he has no chance. Dline recruiting has been poor for SEC standards. You simply cannot win at this level if you can't stop the run or get a consistent pass rush. They will have to get very creative with their lber packages and hope for the best. KY will have to win games with offense and hope the defense can create a good ratio of turnovers a game.
 

Callinstraight

Freshman
Apr 17, 2014
59
59
0
An offensive shootout forces the other team to pass. If the strength of our D is the secondary, and the other team has to keep up with fast scoring, there will be opportunities for 3 and outs and limited defensive series. This will make it easier on our D.

And yes, a spread offense can play some ball control assuming it has a good running game. Otherwise the opposing D won't respect it one bit. Then they can force us into 3 and outs.

One thing I've learned about football is you cannot hide your weaknesses on defense. A team that doesn't pass well will run (Ga Tech). A team that doesn't run well will pass (Boise St, Texas Tech). A team that can't stop the run will most definitely get gashed at the point of attack. This has been Kentucky football for the last 35 years.


I disagree with your premise that an offensive shootout forces the other team to pass. Even if UK can score quickly, that does not mean that the opponent is going to be forced to pass. To the contrary, it's CW for a team to run the ball a lot if it can successfully do so in order to keep the ball out of the hands of a high scoring opponent. And as you acknowledge, UK has had a problem stopping the run over the years. So there is no reason whatsoever to think that just because we can score quickly, an opponent with a good running game is going to simply abandon it to start throwing the ball around. Particularly if our defensive secondary is better at defending the pass than our defensive line is better at defending the run. If anything, an opponent is going to stick to its running game if for no other reason than keeping the ball away from our O.

Sure if a run oriented opponent is down several TDs heading into the fourth quarter, it's going to have to pass the ball and that would be playing into what should be the strength of our D this year. But if our ability to stop the run is as bad as it has been for the last 35 years or so as you claim, I seriously doubt any opponent with a good running game is going to be down 3 TDs heading into the fourth quarter.
 
Oct 1, 2001
5,199
1,898
0
Stoops tenure at KY will solely fall in the hands of Gran and Hinshaw because if they cannot solve the offensive mess that has been at UK under his watch then he has no chance. Dline recruiting has been poor for SEC standards. You simply cannot win at this level if you can't stop the run or get a consistent pass rush. They will have to get very creative with their lber packages and hope for the best. KY will have to win games with offense and hope the defense can create a good ratio of turnovers a game.
I'm certain Mark and his staff are adapting your observations and telling the defense to "man up" as our fans feel we have no chance except possibly edging out the mighty governors of Austin Peay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: un4getables

docholiday51

Heisman
Oct 19, 2001
22,011
26,718
0
Stoops tenure at KY will solely fall in the hands of Gran and Hinshaw because if they cannot solve the offensive mess that has been at UK under his watch then he has no chance. Dline recruiting has been poor for SEC standards. You simply cannot win at this level if you can't stop the run or get a consistent pass rush. They will have to get very creative with their lber packages and hope for the best. KY will have to win games with offense and hope the defense can create a good ratio of turnovers a game.
I don't think it is quite that dire,I think it will come down to, do we have a QB that can execute the offense and make the plays that are there to be made. He doesn't have to be great but good enough to get the ball to the right receivers on time and not turn the ball over too much.
 

UKWinsAgainYep

All-Conference
Nov 11, 2014
2,971
2,484
0
Stoops tenure at KY will solely fall in the hands of Gran and Hinshaw because if they cannot solve the offensive mess that has been at UK under his watch then he has no chance. Dline recruiting has been poor for SEC standards. You simply cannot win at this level if you can't stop the run or get a consistent pass rush. They will have to get very creative with their lber packages and hope for the best. KY will have to win games with offense and hope the defense can create a good ratio of turnovers a game.

This is absolute truth. The season, just like last year, is riding on the offense.

We will simply have to outscore teams in SHOOTOUTS to win games.

Why? Because our D-Line is not a SEC D-Line, pure and simple(They are young and lack depth). In addition, our LBs are mostly green with no game experience at all in the SEC. The only solid part of our defense is the secondary. That is not a good situation in the SEC.

Also, don't forget that Jason Hatcher was a HUGE loss. He was one of the most talented players coming back on our Defense and would have helped tremendously.

It is what it is....

I think the coaching has mostly been good on defense we just simply don't have SEC talent up front like most SEC teams.

Gran will probably make or break Stoops' career at UK. Gran could be the difference between Stoops leaving UK and staying. Our offense has to improve significantly to get to 6 wins and a bowl game.
 

Levibooty

All-American
Jun 29, 2005
26,547
7,667
0
The one significant area we could improve and affect the outcome of a game is our punting teams. We improved to respectability on KO's but we were dreadful punting and returning punts. That is especially true with punt return defense and net punting. All things remaining equal there is enough room for improvements to be made in those areas, that competent execution could could result in a 6th win this year.
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
The one significant area we could improve and affect the outcome of a game is our punting teams. We improved to respectability on KO's but we were dreadful punting and returning punts. That is especially true with punt return defense and net punting. All things remaining equal there is enough room for improvements to be made in those areas, that competent execution could could result in a 6th win this year.

It can mean so much to a team when special teams can come up with some scores on the Kickoff and Punt return teams.
 
Oct 1, 2001
5,199
1,898
0
This is absolute truth. The season, just like last year, is riding on the offense.

We will simply have to outscore teams in SHOOTOUTS to win games.

Why? Because our D-Line is not a SEC D-Line, pure and simple(They are young and lack depth). In addition, our LBs are mostly green with no game experience at all in the SEC. The only solid part of our defense is the secondary. That is not a good situation in the SEC.

Also, don't forget that Jason Hatcher was a HUGE loss. He was one of the most talented players coming back on our Defense and would have helped tremendously.

It is what it is....

I think the coaching has mostly been good on defense we just simply don't have SEC talent up front like most SEC teams.

Gran will probably make or break Stoops' career at UK. Gran could be the difference between Stoops leaving UK and staying. Our offense has to improve significantly to get to 6 wins and a bowl game.
Jason Hatcher had multiple opportunities to adhere to team rules and simply blew it. Will he be missed? I doubt the players will miss a teammate who was his own worst enemy. The fans will miss him with some having overblown expectations while others hope he can resolve personal issues and be the best he can be. Yes, UofL will try to enroll him. Yes, other SEC schools notably in Knoxville would simply sweep his issues "under the rug" as boys will be boys.