Three teams, one NBA combine in Final Four

uk_fan_in_tn

New member
Nov 19, 2008
4,088
36
0
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and I respect that, but this may be one of the worst and most uniformed things I've ever read.

"Duke, Michigan State, Wisconsin players to leave longer legacy than Kentucky's" - UK is on the verge of the first undefeated season in 40 years, do you actually believe a team that goes 40-0 won't leave a lasting impression, I mean really? Regardless if they win it all or not, the idea that these players won't leave a legacy like those of the other final 4 teams is absolutely ludicrous.

"But there is something Bill Belichick-like about the way Calipari twists the rules" - Explain how Calipari twists the rules. Every coach is recruiting the same players! One and done is an NBA rule. You do realize Coach K plays as many freshman as Cal, right? You do realize Duke has more freshmen starters than UK, right? You do realize Duke could have the same amount or more of one-and-done players as UK, right?

"Who in Lexington cares about the return to campus of John Wall, DeMarcus Cousins and Eric Bledsoe and Daniel Orton?" - NBA teams with former UK players play NBA preseason games at Rupp, they sell out. There's a charity game every year that features former UK players, including those that you mentioned, they sell out.

"I wouldn't know enough about them to care, although it's increasingly easy to know Wall needed more maturing before he left college for the NBA" - This statement makes me question whether you've ever watched basketball at all.

It's obvious that no matter what John Calipari does, it will always be wrong in some people's eyes.
 

lyonhawk

New member
Sep 8, 2003
1,157
477
0
Hate to say it, but if UK wins, they'll be remembered as long as we have college basketball.
 

mo.st.dukie

New member
Jan 20, 2007
4,460
311
0
Yeah, this is a little off. Heck, I even think Kyrie Irving, Austin Rivers, and Jabari Parker left a legacy and their teams didn't go to Final Fours. Those guys are as much a part of the Duke basketball community/family as Kyle Singler or J.J. Redick. They chose Duke, they weren't forced to come here through a draft or trade, they had tons of other options but they chose Duke and for that they are Blue Devils for life. Tyus, Justise, and Jahlil, they could lose Saturday and still leave a big legacy at Duke just for the fact they chose Duke and the way they played for the program.
 

Showenuff

New member
Nov 21, 2006
21,624
14,224
0
Well, the probability is slim, but if Duke were to make the championship and then beat Kentucky in the Final. It would overshadow Kentucky big time. Like I said , slim chance, but true.
 

dukiejay

New member
Mar 2, 2005
268,490
16,309
0
Not really buying what you're trying to sell here, Tom. I'm hardly a UK fan, but I think Duke fans would be pretty hypocritical if we didn't acknowledge our team was a lot like the UK teams of the past six years. It's not the fact we start three freshmen, it's that all three of those frosh are likely to be former Duke players in the matter of weeks.

I can't speak for UK fans, but the Duke freshman have left a legacy that will last for years to come....win or lose this weekend.
 

spike05rk

New member
Jul 30, 2008
4,086
381
0
I didn't read the article because just the post was crazy. If Kentucky goes 40 and 0 which I hope that don't it will be an everlasting memory.
 

Crank_it_loud

New member
Sep 3, 2014
1,996
689
0
An everlasting memory with people talking about how weak the SEC was....and that's a big IF Cal doesn't leave them nailed with an infraction.
 

Laettner

New member
Mar 11, 2002
6,249
1,390
0
Cal is not liked due to what he did with Umass, Memphis & Nets not his time at UK. No other coach has had TWO Final Fours recinded and a disastrous NBA stint. Cal is a tremndous basketball mind but the moment his mouth opens, the delivery is snake oil salesman. That's why the general public doesn't like him.
 
Dec 1, 2010
2,458
2,151
0
I wouldn't say he is a "tremendous basketball mind". I think he is an incredible recruiter, a good motivator and salesman. He also showed a very Phil Jackson-like ability this season to manage egos. Sometimes that is all you need. But he has been coaching since '88 and still only has one title. With the talent he has amassed over the years, that doesn't scream tremendous basketball mind. Billy Donovan has only been coaching since '96 and is coaching at a football school and has 2 titles. I always put Donovan in a similar category (questionable game coach, great recruiter) but I have seen him improve over the years on X's and O's. Can't say the same about Cal.

But look, if the one-and-done era lasts another 10 years and Cal stays at UK, I can easily see several more titles for him.
 

Crank_it_loud

New member
Sep 3, 2014
1,996
689
0
This will all be irrelevant after Wisconsin wins on Saturday. UK hasn't played a team of their level all year. Impressive record for sure, but I bet it ends Sat.
 

denniden

New member
Mar 8, 2005
265,898
6,751
0
I do not like the premise of this article. If UK were to win it all (a real possibility) it will be historic. That would be legacy type stuff and something that might not get accomplished for another lifetime.
 

youngman42

New member
Jan 27, 2003
6,787
1,339
0
I hope like crazy that UK loses - but that article is absurd. They are the greatest team of the one-and-done era - were they to keep those players all four years - this could be one of the best CBB teams of all-time. I'd still take the Alcindor & Walton teams over them; as well as the '76 Indiana team, the 56-57 San Francisco Dons, as being better.

As much as I dislike UK, the reality is, this team is worthy of respect. I like them as a team (dislike them b/c they are UK). And Calipari deserves a great deal of credit and coaching.

1) He has gotten a super talented team to sacrifice personal goals for the good of the team. Cauley-Stein is as good as any player in the country, imo, maybe the best player in the country b/c his D is phenomenal. Yet he plays less than 30 mpg and averages less than 10 pts.

2) They play great team D - this is not your typical group of superstar frosh/soph types who want glory and scoring. They focus on D, not on scoring.

3) They are super-long. I've never seen a team with this much length.

4) They play 9 players (early in the season it was 10 before Poythress was injured) - all of them getting significant minutes. And this doesn't hurt the team. This belies the classic Duke-fan response that you can't play more than 7-8 players anyway.

All that said ...

I hope they lose. Go Badgers!!!
 

Showenuff

New member
Nov 21, 2006
21,624
14,224
0
Man, Chris Webber really dogged the hell out of WCS the other day. I almost called a timeout.
 

denniden

New member
Mar 8, 2005
265,898
6,751
0
Originally posted by youngman42:


4) They play 9 players (early in the season it was 10 before Poythress was injured) - all of them getting significant minutes. And this doesn't hurt the team. This belies the classic Duke-fan response that you can't play more than 7-8 players anyway.
Spin much?

On the average, how many title teams play 10 guys consistently late in the year? This Uk team has even shortened the bench a little during the tournament.

You have been around a while, I think you know that almost every single time the coach shortens his bench late in the year. Your little shot at Duke fans is petty in this instance. It is clear they know what they are talking about here. You? Eh.
 

Heyman25

New member
Feb 5, 2003
30,840
49
0
Originally posted by Showenuff:
Man, Chris Webber really dogged the hell out of WCS the other day. I almost called a timeout.


OFC
 

pisgah101

Well-known member
Dec 26, 2005
15,237
12,765
113
UK plays 7 players in crunch time. Sure he may play his "platoon" when up big against the weak teams they've played much of the year but when it comes down to it he plays the normal rotation we and most play.. 7-8 people
 

aah555

New member
Apr 13, 2010
3,064
242
0
Originally posted by dukiejay:
Not really buying what you're trying to sell here, Tom. I'm hardly a UK fan, but I think Duke fans would be pretty hypocritical if we didn't acknowledge our team was a lot like the UK teams of the past six years. It's not the fact we start three freshmen, it's that all three of those frosh are likely to be former Duke players in the matter of weeks.

I can't speak for UK fans, but the Duke freshman have left a legacy that will last for years to come....win or lose this weekend.
Frankly, if Jones declares - as you believe he will, we are worse than UK. Okafor and Winslow (both clear cut top 10 picks) declaring is one thing. Jones declaring as a late first rounder who's basically got as much chance as you and me of going in the top 20 is another. Say what you want about Calipari, but the Harrisons, Cauley-Stein, and Dakari Johnson all had as good of draft stocks (last season) as Jones does now. Paige's draft stock was even better. If we've reached the point where our guys are less likely than their counterparts at UK and UNC to declare after one year, I think that's pretty troubling.

We've reached a pretty bad point in college basketball where a kid would prefer to bounce around the D-league on a rookie NBA contract for a couple seasons than play at Duke -- which is almost certainly the best case scenario for Tyus Jones in the short run.
 

aah555

New member
Apr 13, 2010
3,064
242
0
Originally posted by pisgah101:
UK plays 7 players in crunch time. Sure he may play his "platoon" when up big against the weak teams they've played much of the year but when it comes down to it he plays the normal rotation we and most play.. 7-8 people
UK is unusual in that it does legitimately have a true 7 man rotation of guys who all play significant minutes. Duke, by contrast, truly only plays 6 guys consistently (Amile being the 6th). However, when push comes to shove, UK's 9 man rotation is no more real than Duke's 8 man rotation. Against ND, for instance, Calipari played Dakari Johnson 8 minutes and Marcus Lee two minutes. By comparison, Marshall Plumlee and Grayson Allen each played 8 and 3 minutes respectively against Gonzaga. In the end of the day, the fact that UK has obscenely talented 8 or 9 men will not make a big impact in a head-to-head matchup. Both teams will play their best guys and how those matchups play out will determine the champion.
 

tw3301

New member
Mar 31, 2009
50,564
11,120
0
Originally posted by aah555:

Originally posted by dukiejay:
Not really buying what you're trying to sell here, Tom. I'm hardly a UK fan, but I think Duke fans would be pretty hypocritical if we didn't acknowledge our team was a lot like the UK teams of the past six years. It's not the fact we start three freshmen, it's that all three of those frosh are likely to be former Duke players in the matter of weeks.

I can't speak for UK fans, but the Duke freshman have left a legacy that will last for years to come....win or lose this weekend.
Frankly, if Jones declares - as you believe he will, we are worse than UK. Okafor and Winslow (both clear cut top 10 picks) declaring is one thing. Jones declaring as a late first rounder who's basically got as much chance as you and me of going in the top 20 is another. Say what you want about Calipari, but the Harrisons, Cauley-Stein, and Dakari Johnson all had as good of draft stocks (last season) as Jones does now. Paige's draft stock was even better. If we've reached the point where our guys are less likely than their counterparts at UK and UNC to declare after one year, I think that's pretty troubling.

We've reached a pretty bad point in college basketball where a kid would prefer to bounce around the D-league on a rookie NBA contract for a couple seasons than play at Duke -- which is almost certainly the best case scenario for Tyus Jones in the short run.
I'm not sold that Tyus Jones is gone after this year, FWIW.
 

denniden

New member
Mar 8, 2005
265,898
6,751
0
So it is a fact that Tyus Jones won't contribute in the NBA next year? Huh, never knew that was the way it is. Being that the future has yet to happen.
 

aah555

New member
Apr 13, 2010
3,064
242
0
Originally posted by denniden:
So it is a fact that Tyus Jones won't contribute in the NBA next year? Huh, never knew that was the way it is. Being that the future has yet to happen.
That, unfortunately, is the sort of logic that leads kids to make bad decisions. Historical precedent is historical precedent, and the odds that Tyus is somehow going to buck historical trends are very low.

I've seen Tyus projected anywhere from 24 to 30 in the past couple weeks. If you go look at how those guys have done, it's not pretty. From last year's draft, 3 of the 7 have not played a single minute in the NBA this season. Of the 4 who have played, 2 are averaging below 3 ppg and spent more than 50% of the season in the d-league. The remaining two (Shabazz Napier and PJ Hairston) both average below 6, spent time in the d-league, and I'd note (critically) stand out from the others b/c they're both far more physically prepared to play at the next level (i.e., both are 22-23 years old). As good as Tyus has been, reality is he's the less athletic, smaller version of Tyler Ennis -- a guy who went higher in the draft than Tyus will, yet has struggled mightily and spent much of his first year in the d-league.

And, I think it's also worth adding that while Tyus is currently being projected in the late 20s, reality is that many projected mid-20 guys tend to fall into the second round (where there are no guarantee deals) b/c the best teams at the bottom of the first round typically don't want to add new guaranteed contracts, and end up drafting lesser European guys who they can stash in Europe (and not pay).

Nobody knows with certainty how things will play out for any given kid, but there's a body of data to strongly suggest how it's likely going to go -- at least in the short run. Now, Tyus may certainly get drafted late, struggle as an end-of-bench guy / D-league guys for a year or two, be thrown into a couple trades, and in 3-4 years come out as a solid NBA pro with a future in the league --- but that's really what he's looking at if he declares. The odds of Tyus getting drafted into a good situation where he thrives early are not very good.

This post was edited on 4/1 4:07 PM by aah555
 

Xzander

New member
Oct 30, 2006
1,302
111
0
Can't say much about your writing other then it sucks.

As for who leaves on Duke it might come down to if they win or lose. Lose and it might make the late first rounders come back win and it might make them think "better to leave on a good note".

As for UK's one and dones they are very much apart of the BBN family.
 

denniden

New member
Mar 8, 2005
265,898
6,751
0
Originally posted by aah555:

Originally posted by denniden:
So it is a fact that Tyus Jones won't contribute in the NBA next year? Huh, never knew that was the way it is. Being that the future has yet to happen.
That, unfortunately, is the sort of logic that leads kids to make bad decisions. Historical precedent is historical precedent, and the odds that Tyus is somehow going to buck historical trends are very low.

I've seen Tyus projected anywhere from 24 to 30 in the past couple weeks. If you go look at how those guys have done, it's not pretty. From last year's draft, 3 of the 7 have not played a single minute in the NBA this season. Of the 4 who have played, 2 are averaging below 3 ppg and spent more than 50% of the season in the d-league. The remaining two (Shabazz Napier and PJ Hairston) both average below 6, spent time in the d-league, and I'd note (critically) stand out from the others b/c they're both far more physically prepared to play at the next level (i.e., both are 22-23 years old). As good as Tyus has been, reality is he's the less athletic, smaller version of Tyler Ennis -- a guy who went higher in the draft than Tyus will, yet has struggled mightily and spent much of his first year in the d-league.

And, I think it's also worth adding that while Tyus is currently being projected in the late 20s, reality is that many projected mid-20 guys tend to fall into the second round (where there are no guarantee deals) b/c the best teams at the bottom of the first round typically don't want to add new guaranteed contracts, and end up drafting lesser European guys who they can stash in Europe (and not pay).

Nobody knows with certainty how things will play out for any given kid, but there's a body of data to strongly suggest how it's likely going to go -- at least in the short run. Now, Tyus may certainly get drafted late, struggle as an end-of-bench guy / D-league guys for a year or two, be thrown into a couple trades, and in 3-4 years come out as a solid NBA pro with a future in the league --- but that's really what he's looking at if he declares. The odds of Tyus getting drafted into a good situation where he thrives early are very, very low.
Frankly, Tyus could play all 4 years at Duke and regress as well. (Greg Paulus?) His stock may be at its peek right now. He isn't going to become a 6-5 220 LB PG in the next 3 years who is still dripping with potential. Tyus is a leader, already proven. He can also play the point. What he lacks is experience and physical strength. (which he will gain) Who is to say that a team wouldn't draft him and stash him for a few years while he develops more physically?

You do not have to contribute in the NBA right away to have a long career.
 

aah555

New member
Apr 13, 2010
3,064
242
0
Originally posted by denniden:

Originally posted by aah555:

Originally posted by denniden:
So it is a fact that Tyus Jones won't contribute in the NBA next year? Huh, never knew that was the way it is. Being that the future has yet to happen.
That, unfortunately, is the sort of logic that leads kids to make bad decisions. Historical precedent is historical precedent, and the odds that Tyus is somehow going to buck historical trends are very low.

I've seen Tyus projected anywhere from 24 to 30 in the past couple weeks. If you go look at how those guys have done, it's not pretty. From last year's draft, 3 of the 7 have not played a single minute in the NBA this season. Of the 4 who have played, 2 are averaging below 3 ppg and spent more than 50% of the season in the d-league. The remaining two (Shabazz Napier and PJ Hairston) both average below 6, spent time in the d-league, and I'd note (critically) stand out from the others b/c they're both far more physically prepared to play at the next level (i.e., both are 22-23 years old). As good as Tyus has been, reality is he's the less athletic, smaller version of Tyler Ennis -- a guy who went higher in the draft than Tyus will, yet has struggled mightily and spent much of his first year in the d-league.

And, I think it's also worth adding that while Tyus is currently being projected in the late 20s, reality is that many projected mid-20 guys tend to fall into the second round (where there are no guarantee deals) b/c the best teams at the bottom of the first round typically don't want to add new guaranteed contracts, and end up drafting lesser European guys who they can stash in Europe (and not pay).

Nobody knows with certainty how things will play out for any given kid, but there's a body of data to strongly suggest how it's likely going to go -- at least in the short run. Now, Tyus may certainly get drafted late, struggle as an end-of-bench guy / D-league guys for a year or two, be thrown into a couple trades, and in 3-4 years come out as a solid NBA pro with a future in the league --- but that's really what he's looking at if he declares. The odds of Tyus getting drafted into a good situation where he thrives early are very, very low.
Frankly, Tyus could play all 4 years at Duke and regress as well. (Greg Paulus?) His stock may be at its peek right now. He isn't going to become a 6-5 220 LB PG in the next 3 years who is still dripping with potential. Tyus is a leader, already proven. He can also play the point. What he lacks is experience and physical strength. (which he will gain) Who is to say that a team wouldn't draft him and stash him for a few years while he develops more physically?

You do not have to contribute in the NBA right away to have a long career.
Sure. If Tyus declared, he may eventually come out fine on the other end (after some bumps in the road). He could make it. My point is that, aside from some additional up-front cash, declaring at Tyus's draft position is hardly an obvious, clear-cut choice that is likely to play out well. It's a pretty huge gamble, and historical precedent suggests that the odds are probably going to be stacked against him. Most guys who get drafted in the late 20s are not in the NBA by year 3-4 (which, at that level, precedes any life altering salaries), and getting drafted at that position is hardly a clear springboard to a promising career. As much as people talk about how guys can improve more in the NBA, the real question is whether Tyus can improve more at Duke under the tutelage of Coach K or on a d-league team under the tutelage of a no-name coach, in empty stadiums and with players who have no interest in winning (just stats to impress NBA teams). While obviously Tyus would be giving up a good (but not necessarily life-altering) pay check for a year or two, I do think a kid like him does improve his odds of future, longer-term NBA success by staying in college --- where he can work on his body, improve his lateral quickness, tighten up his jumper, etc. The reality is that most NBA teams will give a guy about 2-3 years to prove he can play in the league. If he's not ready by the end of the year 2, it's very easy to wash out of the league completely and never get another real opportunity to return (Will Avery, Daniel Ewing, Nolan). IMO, borderline-NBA players like Tyus improve their odds by forestalling that decision-point until they're more physically mature.

In the end, the kid is entitled to make whatever decision makes him happy. I will not criticize him for that. But, it is alarming to me that we've reached a point where we have kids declaring after one year even when it's hardly an obvious choice.

This post was edited on 4/1 4:46 PM by aah555
 

jchammock

New member
Aug 17, 2006
19,142
253
0
I'm not going to get into the Duke vs UK debate.

But to think Jone's couldn't be a very good first year talent in the NBA is absurd.

Remember one undersized player that wouldn't be able to shoot over taller guys and wouldn't be able to defend. Now' Curry is looking at MVP. SMH
 

aah555

New member
Apr 13, 2010
3,064
242
0
Originally posted by jchammock:
I'm not going to get into the Duke vs UK debate.

But to think Jone's couldn't be a very good first year talent in the NBA is absurd.

Remember one undersized player that wouldn't be able to shoot over taller guys and wouldn't be able to defend. Now' Curry is looking at MVP. SMH
Stephen averaged 25.3 ppg over a 3 year college career where he averaged 47% from the field, 41% from 3, and ultimately went #7 in the NBA draft after his Jr. year. I think Tyus is a very clutch, high-intangible kid with good skills and off-the-chart basketball IQ, but there's clearly no comparison between the 2. If they were on par (in terms of NBA potential), Tyus would be projected a lot higher than he currently is. If anything, Stephen would be the poster child for how staying in school to develop as a player and person will not necessarily hurt your chances of becoming a high-end NBA player.

I really don't mean to be critical of Tyus -- b/c he's had a good freshman year, but he clearly hasn't been productive enough on a night-in, night-out basis for NBA teams to ignore that he lacks ideal measurables. Curry was unusual b/c his cumulative production at the collegiate level was so off the charts (i.e., he scored 2635 points in 3 seasons) that NBA teams eventually came to the realization that he would be able to be effective even though he didn't necessarily have the measurables they were looking for.
This post was edited on 4/1 6:51 PM by aah555
 

likelarry901

New member
Oct 14, 2007
41,447
22
0
LOL @ Crank it Loud

What a tool.

I like the fact that Duke has three "one and dones" and is a F4 team.

I guess most Duke fans acknowledge that your team mirrors a UK team, which has been criticized over and over.

But Crank it Loud appears to have some personal problems similar to a "crazy UK fan".
 
Jul 28, 2010
7,841
6,979
0
Originally posted by likelarry901:

LOL @ Crank it Loud

What a tool.

I like the fact that Duke has three "one and dones" and is a F4 team.

I guess most Duke fans acknowledge that your team mirrors a UK team, which has been criticized over and over.

But Crank it Loud appears to have some personal problems similar to a "crazy UK fan".
What did Crank post that bunched up your panties? The infractions comment? It's not crazy to think that a coach that left his last two schools on probation might do it a third time. Have you ever read Einstein's definition of insanity?

Duke has been recruiting the best players for years; so has KY. However, now, players are only staying a year instead of at least 2-3. Consequently, Duke didn't "mirror a KY team." Duke did what it's been doing for years. The times just changed. K and Duke fans dislike it as much as Cal (reportedly) does.

On the other hand, Cal and KY did copy K's model of playing neutral site games rather than home-and-homes. That little thing that KY fans always made fun of Duke for (not playing on the road) became the best idea since sliced bread (in Lexington) after Cal announced the same strategy.
 

Volstreet

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2004
46,474
2,002
113
I believe this UK team will leave a big legacy with UK fans if they win it all. They will always be remembered. I still think the 2012 team is better. As far as Cal goes...it is not the fact that he takes one and done players, it is how he goes about it. He has pretty much exploited this rule and uses this as his recruiting tool. His style only works if he continues to get these one and done players. Cal is a great recruiter but the fact his biggest sell is that the players can use one year at UK to make millions of dollars just seems a bit slimy. You can say that coach K does the same if it makes you feel better but I don't believe for a second that he uses this rule to recruit at all. He sells Duke as a program and Duke as a school. UK fans try to lump Duke into the UK one and done category to make themselves feel good about it. Duke has had some one and done players but I just don't believe that was the reason they came to Duke.