He wouldn't win the division with Alabama's roster..
I completely agree with this.
To me, coaching is all about lots of little, seemingly insignificant decisions, that shape a program and causes the results you see on the field.
Whether it is how a team practices, what scheme they are running, who they are recruiting and why, what is being emphasized or developed, as well as who is playing, and the kind of leadership and culture that exists in the program.
It also spills over into the games from game planning to personnel, to clock management and the plays being called.
In some ways, it's like a multi-layer combination lock to get the maximum out of what you have and also grow momentum forward by each of those little decisions you make day in and day out.
There are some coaches who have figured out the key to that multi-layer combination lock.. where to put their time and resources and also where it doesn't serve them. Some coaches learn this over a period of time. Others, maybe are just not good locksmiths.. even with all good intentions.
We may not be able to hire a guy that already knows the key to the lock, but hiring a bright younger guy, gives you a chance at it.
We tried that last time, and even though it didn't work out,
it was a very good attempt.
Bringing in someone more seasoned who doesn't have the key is not a good 'at bat'. That's the main error in Shawn Eichorst's thinking and why we are where we are today.