http://www.tmz.com/2010/0...n-ncaa-scandal/#comments
Now can we get TMZ to investigate a certain QB at another SEC school whose name rhymes with Spam Cueton?
Tiny Gallon takes $$$?
- Thread starter Ringo.sixpack
- Start date
http://www.tmz.com/2010/0...n-ncaa-scandal/#comments
Now can we get TMZ to investigate a certain QB at another SEC school whose name rhymes with Spam Cueton?
It would be nice if they could find a money trail all the way back to an Oklahoma booster. Even if not, Oklahoma should have to forefeit all their games played this season. Of course that can't happen because they just had their hand spanked over Sampson. Small D1 schools across the nation are currently trembling in fear.
This SHOULD be a death penalty situation, but of course it won't be. They should atminimum get a big penalty, but probably won't even get that. The football violation below happened just one year after Kelvin Sampson's thing, and their penalties weren't very strong. If three in four years doesn't constitute lack of institutional control, I don't know what does.
Institution: University of Oklahoma<label class="prompt">Date: </label>July 11, 2007
<label class="prompt">Violation Sumary: </label>Violations in the football program involving Impermissible extra benefits -payment for work not performed and failure to monitor.
<label class="prompt">Penalty Summary: </label>Additional penalties imposed by the committee are as follows: public reprimand and censure; two additional years of probation (extended to May 23, 2010); reduce by two the total number of grants it may offer in football for both the 2008-09 and 2009-10; vacation of all wins in which the two ineligible student-athletes competed during the 2005 football season; disassociation of the former auto dealership's manager for a five-year period; annual compliance reporting required.
Institution: University of Oklahoma<label class="prompt">Date: </label>May 25, 2006
<label class="prompt">Violation Sumary: </label>Violations of NCAA legislation governing impermissible telephone contacts with prospective student-athletes.
<label class="prompt">Penalty Summary: </label>Penalties imposed by the committee were: public reprimand and censure; two years of probation; show cause order for a period of one-year for the former head men's basketball coach; show cause provision placed on a former assistant coach for a period of three years which runs concurrently and independently in conjunction with a another case and expiring on March 16, 2008;annual compliance reporting.
Institution: University of Oklahoma<label class="prompt">Date: </label>July 11, 2007
<label class="prompt">Violation Sumary: </label>Violations in the football program involving Impermissible extra benefits -payment for work not performed and failure to monitor.
<label class="prompt">Penalty Summary: </label>Additional penalties imposed by the committee are as follows: public reprimand and censure; two additional years of probation (extended to May 23, 2010); reduce by two the total number of grants it may offer in football for both the 2008-09 and 2009-10; vacation of all wins in which the two ineligible student-athletes competed during the 2005 football season; disassociation of the former auto dealership's manager for a five-year period; annual compliance reporting required.
Institution: University of Oklahoma<label class="prompt">Date: </label>May 25, 2006
<label class="prompt">Violation Sumary: </label>Violations of NCAA legislation governing impermissible telephone contacts with prospective student-athletes.
<label class="prompt">Penalty Summary: </label>Penalties imposed by the committee were: public reprimand and censure; two years of probation; show cause order for a period of one-year for the former head men's basketball coach; show cause provision placed on a former assistant coach for a period of three years which runs concurrently and independently in conjunction with a another case and expiring on March 16, 2008;annual compliance reporting.
the Bomar issue was football related and Gallon's is basketball related.
Even if the school were involved in the Gallon issue, which it doesnt seem they are since it was player-agent, why would they get the death penalty based partially on an incident in the football program?
Id think a violation in a different sport wouldnt affect basketball.
...unless you are suggesting the entire Sooner athletic department should get the death penalty due to multiple violations by multiple programs? If so, then thats just funny.
Even if the school were involved in the Gallon issue, which it doesnt seem they are since it was player-agent, why would they get the death penalty based partially on an incident in the football program?
Id think a violation in a different sport wouldnt affect basketball.
...unless you are suggesting the entire Sooner athletic department should get the death penalty due to multiple violations by multiple programs? If so, then thats just funny.
By the rulesit doesn't have to be the same sport hit twiceto incur the death penalty. Whichever sport got hit 2nd would get it.
But the other poster was probably right--if it stays a player-agent thing, then the NCAA won't hit OU that hard. Still, being their 3rd major case in 4 years, you'd think they'd get some sort of hard penalty.
But the other poster was probably right--if it stays a player-agent thing, then the NCAA won't hit OU that hard. Still, being their 3rd major case in 4 years, you'd think they'd get some sort of hard penalty.
MedDawg said:
Wow, if that really how its set up, then thats friggin absurd. That makes no sense. And while i dont think the NCAA makes a ton of sense in how it does things at times, that REALLY doesnt make sense.