To the haters..

MSUCostanza

Redshirt
Jan 10, 2007
5,706
0
0
You know who you are.

Go to hell. Third ever win in Lexington, and we dominated start to finish. Three straight over UK for the first time ever. 3-1 on the road in the league this year. They only made one run at us, we held our poise and took the game back over.

Anyone complaining about anything regarding this game is a fracking moron.
 

MSUCostanza

Redshirt
Jan 10, 2007
5,706
0
0
You know who you are.

Go to hell. Third ever win in Lexington, and we dominated start to finish. Three straight over UK for the first time ever. 3-1 on the road in the league this year. They only made one run at us, we held our poise and took the game back over.

Anyone complaining about anything regarding this game is a fracking moron.
 

OEMDawg

Redshirt
Mar 22, 2008
1,383
0
0
My comment was legit. Congrats to your man for pulling it out. He deserves the win. But like I said, there is NO EXCUSE for leaving your starters in for 13 minutes, especially when the other team is closing a 13 point gap to 2 points. Props to Barry for hitting the big shot and extending the lead, but since you are worried about nothing but kissing Stans's *** and running back to the board to stroke your ego, you might have noticed that Jarvis missed an easy dunk and we missed our first 4 threes because our guys were worn out.
 

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
54
48
Great game tonight....

We made 3 pointers and we won, we hit the boards tonight and played great defense...
Good job Stans and great job shooters and SWAT...

Go DAWGS.... Let's keep that great shooting going...
 

Agentdog

Redshirt
Aug 16, 2006
1,433
0
0
This coming from the guy who once said he would not walk across campus to watch State play football. Oh, and I see you predicted the win in the prediction threads.
 

muddawgs33

Redshirt
Aug 28, 2007
822
0
0
My comment was legit. Congrats to your man for pulling it out. He deserves the win. But like I said, there is NO EXCUSE for leaving your starters in for 13 minutes, especially when the other team is closing a 13 point gap to 2 points.
It wasn't that big of a deal. There were plenty of timeouts that were called during that stretch. You act like they played 13 straight minutes without a stoppage in play. Home teams are always going to go on a run. We withstood it and won the game, so quit bitching.
 

RobertF50

Redshirt
Apr 27, 2008
276
0
0
OEM's an ******* even when we win big. Why don't you become a Bama fan. That would be a good fit for a piece of **** like you.
 

muddawgs33

Redshirt
Aug 28, 2007
822
0
0
Quit being a ***** and acting like the only reason we won was because of the 3pt shooting. Normally, 64 pts gets your *** beat in Rupp Arena. We held them to their lowest point total at home for the year so far. </p>
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
0
said he did not sub bc alot of timeouts had been called and they were not tired ....don't shoot the messenger
 

MSUCostanza

Redshirt
Jan 10, 2007
5,706
0
0
Fail.

I wouldn't walk across campus to watch a Croom-coached team, you are right. But Stansbury actually does his job.

And I didn't realize I was required to post a prediction in order to ridicule those douches who constantly berate Stansbury on this board.
 

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
54
48
I venture to say hell no, we would have lost...
3 point shooting AND defense won the game tonight...
You just hate to admit I am right..
 

RonnyAtmosphere

Redshirt
Jun 4, 2007
2,883
0
0
RobertF50 said:
OEM's an ******* even when we win big. Why don't you become a Bama fan. That would be a good fit for a piece of **** like you.

...Bama Nation actually demands their fans leave mommy's basement & attend a game every once in a while.

OEM's thing it not to attend games, but to just sit at home during games & dog cuss the players & coaches on the internet.
 

muddawgs33

Redshirt
Aug 28, 2007
822
0
0
I venture to say hell no, we would have lost...
3 point shooting AND defense won the game tonight...
You just hate to admit I am right..
But, I'm pretty sure we wouldn't have shot as many 3's if we were shooting 20%. Our guards drove a lot to the basket tonite and I'm sure we would have gone more inside. I would also say that even with our 3pt shooting, we would have lost tonite if not for our defense. With our great defense, we still would have had a chance to win without our great 3pt shooting tonite. You just try to make every win as the players won it and every loss is on Stans. That's why most on here think you are a complete douche...
 

dawgman42

All-American
Jul 24, 2007
5,783
5,373
113
OEMDawg said:
My comment was legit. Congrats to your man for pulling it out. He deserves the win. But like I said, there is NO EXCUSE for leaving your starters in for 13 minutes, especially when the other team is closing a 13 point gap to 2 points. Props to Barry for hitting the big shot and extending the lead, but since you are worried about nothing but kissing Stans's *** and running back to the board to stroke your ego, you might have noticed that Jarvis missed an easy dunk and we missed our first 4 threes because our guys were worn out.
Good lord, are you really serious? I don't care if he had Jarvis and Ravern *****-slapping the ball boys and cleaning wet spots on the court during time outs. Play those guys until their tongues hit the ground. And, hey, look at that . . . we beat the snot out of them.

This is about beating Kentucky at Rupp. As much grief as Stans deserved against OM on Saturday, he deserves the credit and accolades today. You don't have to like it, but accept it like a man.
 

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
54
48
Just look at our last game, we shot more even more 3 point shots than we did tonight, but shot under 30% and we LOST.
Tonight we hit 52% and we WON...

We did play better defense tonight, but this team will live and die by the 3 pointer... Tonight we LIVE....

Go Dawgs........
 

muddawgs33

Redshirt
Aug 28, 2007
822
0
0
Just look at our last game, we shot more even more 3 point shots than we did tonight, but shot under 30% and we LOST.
Tonight we hit 52% and we WON...

We shot 29% from 3's and a whopping 34% from 2 pt shots against Ole Miss. We shot like **** and that's on the players. There is nothing Stans can do when your players are shooting 31% for the game and yet we only lost by 4, because of what douchebag... Defense... Your stupidity never seems to amaze me...
 

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
54
48
And lost the game vs Ole Miss b/c we shot for ****, we shoot better vs the Rebels we win, especially from 3 point land...
How can you say anything else.... Yes our defense was better tonight, but our shooting was GREAT tonight...

Stats don't lie.....
 

muddawgs33

Redshirt
Aug 28, 2007
822
0
0
And lost the game vs Ole Miss b/c we shot for ****, we shoot better vs the Rebels we win, especially from 3 point land...
How can you say anything else.... Yes our defense was better tonight, but our shooting was GREAT tonight...

Stats don't lie.....
We shot 8-23 from 2 pt shots against Ole Miss... You don't think that had more to do with us losing to Ole Miss than our 29% 3pt shooting? We shoot 36.8% on the year from 3's. So your telling me, if we shot our average tonite that we lose? I say ********. And don't take you douche *** and subtract 4 3's from tonite and then take the ending score and say yeah, because Kentucky got a bunch of cheap buckets at the end.
 

Frances Drebin

Redshirt
Nov 16, 2005
1,639
0
0
...really isn't the issue. The fact is that this team plays a small lineup that jacks up a lot of low percentage shots. I mean, come on....how many 25-footers did we shoot and hit tonight? We played well defensively tonight, but why can't we be consistent defensively? Where was this defense against Ole Miss.

I'm ecstatic that we beat KY in their house because that just doesn't happen often. But Stans said it himself in postgame comments: "We're not as good as we played tonight." We've managed to play ourselves back into the conversation for hosting an NIT game, but this really doesn't undo the ugly losses on the schedule, either.
 

Ol Blue.sixpack

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
1,681
0
0
Frances Drebin said:
...really isn't the issue. The fact is that this team plays a small lineup that jacks up a lot of low percentage shots. I mean, come on....how many 25-footers did we shoot and hit tonight? We played well defensively tonight, but why can't we be consistent defensively? Where was this defense against Ole Miss.

I'm ecstatic that we beat KY in their house because that just doesn't happen often. But Stans said it himself in postgame comments: "We're not as good as we played tonight." We've managed to play ourselves back into the conversation for hosting an NIT game, but this really doesn't undo the ugly losses on the schedule, either.

Another bad win, huh?
 

windcrysmary

Redshirt
Nov 11, 2007
1,788
0
0
all we are saying is that the fan base needs to take a long hard look at what our expectations are and what we should expect out of MSU hoops...

after what.. 12 years? yes..he has done well overall in conference play.. no complaints whatsover... I don't think anyone was even expecting us to dance this season based on our youth.... and believe me.. we will NOT be dancing... but that's fine because we were not expected to...

eventually though, Stans and Greg will have to have a sit down and discuss what is best for not only MSU but Stans himself... 12 years is a long damn time.. after 12 years of out playing our west rivals and we could throw in a few east teams too...no ? ALL of them have made at LEAST 1 sweet 16 appearance....didn't ole miss make one since stans became HC?

when you are a SEC west team you you get that opportunity every 3 or 4 years with the right group of players and you do something special as a bench coach and you make that run...sometimes you fall short but eventually you are going to make that run if you have the know how and guts to get the most out of your players...it's called doing something special... on the National Scene... that's what you have to do when you have the typical SEC west team...you HAVE to capitalize on those limited opportunities . and we have been above typical and we have not done it... period...end of discussion...

if Stans can't make a sweet 16 appearance either next season or the one after, we have to assume he's just riding the good ship lollipop and it would be best if he move on for not only MSU but for himself...time for a new venue so to speak

and yes... I know we could do a hell of a lot worse...maybe... but I doubt it...
 

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
54
48
It's like arguing with a second grader, stats don't lie..
I never said if we shot our average would would have lost last night, we will never know b/c we shot 52% form 3 point land.
No Elgin and not Johnson had alot to do with our loss to Ole Miss, along with poor 3 point shooting.
We make two more 3 pointers vs Ole Miss(we still would be below our average of 36.8%) and we win, period!!!!!!!!

We live and die by the 3 pointer and last night it really showed....We Won......

Damn your are an idiot........
</p>
 

irsdawg

Redshirt
Jan 17, 2009
19
0
0
fishwater99 said:
It's like arguing with a second grader, stats don't lie..
I never said if we shot our average would would have lost last night, we will never know b/c we shot 52% form 3 point land.
No Elgin and not Johnson had alot to do with our loss to Ole Miss, along with poor 3 point shooting.
We make two more 3 pointers vs Ole Miss(we still would be below our average of 36.8%) and we win, period!!!!!!!!

We live and die by the 3 pointer and last night it really showed....We Won......

Damn your are an idiot........
</p>

UK has scored AT LEAST 67 poionts in every home game they've played this season - until last night. Holding them below that number was the difference in the game. In other words, doubling and tripling Patterson and face gaurding Meeks was the difference. Excellant defensive gameplan and excellant execution.

Move on to something else. YOU are looking like an idiot.