Told you who was next.......

[bornaneer]

Debbie Schlussel, a former Fox News guest, appeared on a local radio show on Friday and recounted an incident where Sean Hannity purportedly asked her to a hotel, and when she rebuffed his advances, she claims, she was ostracized by the network star. The story has since gone viral garnering headlines like “Sean Hannity Accused of Sexually Harassing Fox News Guest” in publications like The Daily Beast and The Huffington Post. Now, in an interview with LawNewz.com on Monday morning, Schlussel is denying that she was ever sexually harassed by Sean Hannity. While Schlussel stands by her description of the incident, Schlussel told us that she doesn’t believe what happened between the two amounted to sexual harassment by any legal definition.

“I would never accuse him of that. Sexual harassment has a special meaning under the law, and I would never accuse him of that,” Schlussel, an attorney herself, said. Schlussel said the interaction happened in the early 2000’s when Hannity was in Detroit taping a show.

 

[MountaineerWV]

Yeah, well maybe Hannity's wife might think about that situation........but FoxNews is about conservative and moral values.........[thumbsup]

 

[PriddyBoy]

 

[dave]

Yeah, well maybe Hannity's wife might think about that situation........but FoxNews is about conservative and moral values.........[thumbsup]

You seem like the gullible type.

 

[MountaineerWV]

Or.......it could be the fact that Hannity invited a woman, who is NOT HIS WIFE, up to his hotel room. Ok, maybe not sexual harassment......but immoral?

 

[bornaneer]

You seem like the gullible type.

Here he is.......

 

[bornaneer]

Or.......it could be the fact that Hannity invited a woman, who is NOT HIS WIFE, up to his hotel room. Ok, maybe not sexual harassment......but immoral?

She even said he DID NOT invite her "up to his hotel room". Other people were present and have verified that fact.

 

[PriddyBoy]

Or.......it could be the fact that Hannity invited a woman, who is NOT HIS WIFE, up to his hotel room. Ok, maybe not sexual harassment......but immoral?

the fact

 

[dave]

Or.......it could be the fact that Hannity invited a woman, who is NOT HIS WIFE, up to his hotel room. Ok, maybe not sexual harassment......but immoral?

You dont know what happened. You sound like some dumb blabbermouth cuntbag at the beauty salon.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

You dont know what happened. You sound like some dumb blabbermouth cuntbag at the beauty salon.

More of those Christian values.

 

[bornaneer]

More of those Christian values.

Who mentioned Christian values? You folks are delusional.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

Who mentioned Christian values? You folks are delusional.

The guy that used the term "cuntbag" is the guy that professes Christianity.

I know that was really complicated and difficult for you to understand.

 

[bornaneer]

The guy that used the term "cuntbag" is the guy that professes Christianity.

I know that was really complicated and difficult for you to understand.

Its even more difficult for you. The guy never said a peep about "Christianity" in this thread. And since when does the description "cuntbag" have anything to do with Christianity?

 

[dave]

More of those Christian values.

More hypocrisy from the board dunce.

 

[dave]

The guy that used the term "cuntbag" is the guy that professes Christianity.

I know that was really complicated and difficult for you to understand.

Where in the Bible does it say not to be honest? Why would I ask you though, you know nothing about the Bible.

 

[atlkvb]

Or.......it could be the fact that Hannity invited a woman, who is NOT HIS WIFE, up to his hotel room. Ok, maybe not sexual harassment......but immoral?

Immoral? What does that mean on the Left? Ask @Boomboom521 to explain the Left's definition of that for you and where it comes from, or even if there can be such a thing in Leftist nomenclature?

Immoral? To whom?

Immoral, on the Left?

Don't make me laugh.

 

[Boomboom521]

Immoral? What does that mean on the Left? Ask @Boomboom521 to explain the Left's definition of that for you and where it comes from, or even if there can be such a thing in Leftist nomenclature?

Immoral? To whom?

Immoral, on the Left?

Don't make me laugh.

Call me out on a thread I'm not a part of?

Christianity does not have a monopoly on morality. The fact that you think so is utterly ridiculous. We were discussing morality's place in the classroom. There are differences in moral tenants between people of faith, even just among Christians, and as a teacher it's not my place to attempt to alter or instill a sense of ultimate morality on my students (such as whether the death penalty is just, or is homosexuality deviant behavior). The morality I touch on is associated with a citizen's relationships to one another. Respect, fairness, caring, empathy, and duty not derived from your go to moral code, but the fabric of humanity that dictates moral standards.

But keep thinking you (and only those in adherence to Judeo-Christian doctorine) are the only people with a sense of morality......it just shows how grossly biased you are in your vision of others.

BTW.....you want to address me, do so. Don't prance around the board acting like a 14 yr old cheerleader talking smack about the new addition to the squad. My moral values are not only strong, they are centered in a tradition that doesn't give me an ability to act in contrast to them and conveniently dismiss those acts. My memory isn't cleansed by another figure. I carry my failures with me, and learn from them.

 

[Boomboom521]

A lot of defending someone that no one on here knows very well.

Are we now trying to say that the left has infiltrated FOX news and have created a false sense of sexual harassment? Or is the accusations of the liberal influence just have to do with Hannity's situation? Cause it seems like the woman is just discussing the situation, and not accusing Hannity of anything but being a jerk. What exactly is the liberal goal here? Discredit FOX news?

 

[WVUCOOPER]

Would not.

 

[TarHeelEer]

Call me out on a thread I'm not a part of?

Christianity does not have a monopoly on morality. The fact that you think so is utterly ridiculous. We were discussing morality's place in the classroom. There are differences in moral tenants between people of faith, even just among Christians, and as a teacher it's not my place to attempt to alter or instill a sense of ultimate morality on my students (such as whether the death penalty is just, or is homosexuality deviant behavior). The morality I touch on is associated with a citizen's relationship to one another. Respect, fairness, caring, empathy, and duty not derived from your go to moral code, but the fabric of humanity that dictates moral standards.

But keep thinking you (and only those in adherence to Judeo-Christian doctorine) are the only people with a sense of morality......it just shows how grossly biased you are in your vision of others.

BTW.....you want to address me, do so. Don't prance around the board acting like a 14 yr old cheerleader talking smack about the new addition to the squad. My moral values are not only strong, they are centered in a tradition that doesn't give me an ability to act in contrast to them and conveniently dismiss those acts. My memory isn't cleansed by another figure. I carry my failures with me, and learn from them.

I'm going to split the difference between you two.

Secular world does have a definition of morality. But this definition is subject to change, it has changed, and will change. What we find perverse today could be mainstream 100 years from now.

Christianity's moral values remain constant, and always will.

 

[atlkvb]

Call me out on a thread I'm not a part of?

Christianity does not have a monopoly on morality. The fact that you think so is utterly ridiculous. We were discussing morality's place in the classroom. There are differences in moral tenants between people of faith, even just among Christians, and as a teacher it's not my place to attempt to alter or instill a sense of ultimate morality on my students (such as whether the death penalty is just, or is homosexuality deviant behavior). The morality I touch on is associated with a citizen's relationships to one another. Respect, fairness, caring, empathy, and duty not derived from your go to moral code, but the fabric of humanity that dictates moral standards.

But keep thinking you (and only those in adherence to Judeo-Christian doctorine) are the only people with a sense of morality......it just shows how grossly biased you are in your vision of others.

BTW.....you want to address me, do so. Don't prance around the board acting like a 14 yr old cheerleader talking smack about the new addition to the squad. My moral values are not only strong, they are centered in a tradition that doesn't give me an ability to act in contrast to them and conveniently dismiss those acts. My memory isn't cleansed by another figure. I carry my failures with me, and learn from them.

Sorry boomer my Man.

I was just laughing at the OP's suggestion that Hannity did something "immoral", and I simply was suggesting that perhaps you could set him straight on just what morality means today, at this present time in this particular case, fully aware that it's likely to change tomorrow, and the day after that, and the day after that too!

You of course along with the rest of the Left will no doubt define the new parameters of the immoral offense du jour since obviously there is no common standard you all are currently in support of maintaining.

If I offended you, didn't mean to do so. No doubt you've been perfectly clear that your particular morality is rooted in the ever changing, constantly wavering, always flexible nature of "boomerism" and that's quite frankly why I suggested he refer to your expertise to find out just exactly how to apply this particular alleged offense of Hannity's that the Left is now apparently so upset about to the current sliding standards of morality you and other Leftists so strongly argue yourself in possession of.

Carry on.

 

[atlkvb]

I'm going to split the difference between you two.

Secular world does have a definition of morality. But this definition is subject to change, it has changed, and will change. What we find perverse today could be mainstream 100 years from now.

Christianity's moral values remain constant, and always will.

This is true in practice if not exactly in its intent to describe.

 

[atlkvb]

the fabric of humanity that dictates moral standards.

Hey boomer, where does one go to find these standards? Can I get a pdf version for reference?

I'll need the latest "updated" version please...the one from last week won't work for me...I'd like to stay current with the latest version of morality from the "fabric of humanity".

Sounds so cosmopolitan 'ya know?

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Would not.

I'm not sure i believe the story. If I'm famous, I'm not even going to attempt at laying that down. I've went home with better at closing time.

 

[Boomboom521]

I'm going to split the difference between you two.

Secular world does have a definition of morality. But this definition is subject to change, it has changed, and will change. What we find perverse today could be mainstream 100 years from now.

Christianity's moral values remain constant, and always will.

Really? That's the truth in your opinion? Christian values have remained constant?

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Hey boomer, where does one go to find these standards? Can I get a pdf version for reference?

I'll need the latest "updated" version please...the one from last week won't work for me...I'd like to stay current with the latest version of morality from the "fabric of humanity".

Sounds so cosmopolitan 'ya know?

I'm in agreement with him. I'm not a Christian, my moral fiber may have roots in Christian principles, but i do not believe in the tenets of Christian dogma, or any dogma for that matter. I'm agnostic. I don't think anyone has it figured out. But, back to point, Christians do not have a monopoly on morality. I'd argue Bushido has a much stronger base and it's not based on the Jesus.

 

[Boomboom521]

Sorry boomer my Man.

I was just laughing at the OP's suggestion that Hannity did something "immoral", and I simply was suggesting that perhaps you could set him straight on just what morality means today, at this present time in this particular case, fully aware that it's likely to change tomorrow, and the day after that, and the day after that too!

You of course along with the rest of the Left will no doubt define the new parameters of the immoral offense du jour since obviously there is no common standard you all are currently in support of maintaining.

If I offended you, didn't mean to do so. No doubt you've been perfectly clear that your particular morality is rooted in the ever changing, constantly wavering, always flexible nature of "boomerism" and that's quite frankly why I suggested he refer to your expertise to find out just exactly how to apply this particular alleged offense of Hannity's that the Left is now apparently so upset about to the current sliding standards of morality you and other Leftists so strongly argue yourself in possession of.

Carry on.

There's nothing flexible about the commitments you make to others, imo. If Hannity and his wife decide to "swing", to me, that's their business. But if he tells her, your it for me, then sleeps around....that's immoral. Nothing's going to change that, ever.

 

[TarHeelEer]

Really? That's the truth in your opinion? Christian values have remained constant?

Yes. Whether supposed Christians have practiced those precisely or not is another story.

 

[Boomboom521]

Yes. Whether supposed Christians have practiced those precisely or not is another story.

Constant since when? Are you telling me that the Christian idea of morality in 1617 is the same as it is in 2017? How about 1917 versus 2017? How many divisions of the Christian religion are there? There's no differences in moral code between sects?

 

[Boomboom521]

Hey boomer, where does one go to find these standards? Can I get a pdf version for reference?

I'll need the latest "updated" version please...the one from last week won't work for me...I'd like to stay current with the latest version of morality from the "fabric of humanity".

Sounds so cosmopolitan 'ya know?

Maybe if your inner voice wasn't so muted....you'd be able to access them any time you wanted.

 

[CAJUNEER_rivals]

Constant since when? Are you telling me that the Christian idea of morality in 1617 is the same as it is in 2017? How about 1917 versus 2017? How many divisions of the Christian religion are there? There's no differences in moral code between sects?

The core has been consistent. People remember Christians who supported slavery and forget it was Christians in Europe and America who abolished slavery.

 

[atlkvb]

Christianity does not have a monopoly on morality

Really boomer? You could have fooled me. You argue as if it at least attempts to be the sole arbiter of such. When did I ever suggest it was? I argue for Christian morality that is true, but I'm willing to concede to its competitors. Let's have it.

The fact that you think so is utterly ridiculous.

OK. I'm not even allowed to compete even after accepting your charge that my morality is not the only option?

We were discussing morality's place in the classroom

Funny boom, I thought the classroom was no place for such a discussion?

There are differences in moral tenants between people of faith,

But you just claimed Christianity thinks it's all there is? Which is it?

even just among Christians

You just said Christianity does not have a monopoly on morality. Now you're saying Christians disagree on their own morality? So which Christian "monopoly" are you worried about boom?

and as a teacher it's not my place to attempt to alter or instill a sense of ultimate morality on my students

OK, so why worry about what Christians believe? Who's asking your students to accept only their version of morality? You sure are intent on making sure they reject it (at the expense of everything else of course)

The morality I touch on is associated with a citizen's relationships to one another.

Is this in the classroom, or in your personal Life? I mean you did say the classroom is no place to teach morality or am I putting words in your mouth boom?

the fabric of humanity that dictates moral standards.

Well that's certainly comforting. I really liked that fabric when my ancestors were enslaved...no one had a right to insist that was wrong back then...after all it was a different time for both yours and my ancestors wasn't it boom? Fabric was pretty cool for you White folks.... wonder what changed it?

My memory isn't cleansed by another figure. I carry my failures with me, and learn from them.

Funny boomer, I thought you had finished your "cleansing" and your morality had removed all of your foibles. You almost had me convinced following your prescription of moral "options" one could live the perfect Life as you apparently do?

I'm going to you from now on to find out just exactly how to apply the perfect moral mix to my "mo".

Maybe you can start me off with how I should feel "morally" about having 65% of my personal income taken away from me by the various Government agencies who have their hands on my wallet before I even bring my hard earned pay home?

It breaks down like this:

Federal tax rate 23%
State tax rate 16%
F.I.C.A tax rate 15.6% (combination employer/employee pay)
Medicare tax rate 7.5%
Sales tax rate (on finished goods and services...anywhere from 1.5 up to 6% rate)

Total=65-68% depending on how you calculate the sales taxes on my "after tax" dollars.

How "moral" is that boom My Man? How should I react to that, I mean today, at this time?

 

[atlkvb]

Maybe if your inner voice wasn't so muted....you'd be able to access them any time you wanted.

So my "inner voice" contains the data boom? How do I get that updated then to the "latest inner voice" version?

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

The core has been consistent. People remember Christians who supported slavery and forget it was Christians in Europe and America who abolished slavery.

Ummmm, your post proves Boom's point exactly.

I think it's a great day for a good old fashioned witch trial. Someone prepare the dunking chair.

 

[Boomboom521]

So my "inner voice" contains the data boom? How do I get that updated then to the "latest inner voice" version?

Tough to do when you can't hear it in the first place. Can't help you out, sorry

 

[MountaineerWV]

Federal tax rate 23%
State tax rate 16%
F.I.C.A tax rate 15.6% (combination employer/employee pay)
Medicare tax rate 7.5%
Sales tax rate (on finished goods and services...anywhere from 1.5 up to 6% rate)

Total=65-68% depending on how you calculate the sales taxes on my "after tax" dollars.

Do you drive on roads? Are you protected by our military?

 

[Boomboom521]

Really boomer? You could have fooled me. You argue as if it at least attempts to be the sole arbiter of such. when did I ever suggest it was? I argue for Christian morality that is true, but I'm willing to concede to it's competitors. Let's have it.



OK. I'm not even allowed to compete even after accepting your charge that my morality is not the only option?



Funny boom, I thought the classroom was no place for such a discussion?



But you just claimed Christianity thinks it's all there is? Which is it?



You just said Christianity does not have a monopoly on morality. Now you're saying Christians disagree on their own morality? So which Christian "monopoly" are you worried about boom?




OK, so why worry about what Christians believe? Who's asking your students to accept only their version of morality? You sure are intent on making sure they reject it (at the expense of everything else of course)


Is this in the classroom, or in your personal Life? I mean you did say the classroom is no place to teach morality or am I putting words in your mouth boom?



Well that's certainly comforting. I really liked that fabric when my ancestors were enslaved...no one had a right to insist that was wrong back then...after all it was a different time for both yours and my ancestors wasn't it boom? Fabric was pretty coo for you White folks.... wonder what changed it?



Funny boomer, I thought you had finished your "cleansing" and your morality had removed all of your foibles. You almost had me convinced following your prescription of moral "options" one could live the perfect Life as you apparently do?

I'm going to you from now on to find out just exactly how to apply the perfect moral mix to my "mo".

Maybe you can start me off with how I should feel "morally" about having 65% of my personal income taken away from my by the various Governments who have their hands on my wallet before I even bring my hard earned pay home?

It breaks down like this:

Federal tax rate 23%
State tax rate 16%
F.I.C.A tax rate 15.6% (combination employer/employee pay)
Medicare tax rate 7.5%
Sales tax rate (on finished goods and services...anywhere from 1.5 up to 6% rate)

Total=65-68% depending on how you calculate the sales taxes on my "after tax" dollars.

How "moral" is that boom My Man? How should I react to that, I mean today, at this time?

Do all Christians equate money with morality? Is that a core value? Go flip over some tables then.

 

[Mntneer]

I'm not sure i believe the story. If I'm famous, I'm not even going to attempt at laying that down. I've went home with better at closing time.

Why did it take so long for someone to post a pic.... have you monkeys forgotten the rules?

She looks like an O'Reilly reject.

 

[MountaineerWV]

Why did it take so long for someone to post a pic.... have you monkeys forgotten the rules?

She looks like an O'Reilly reject.

Ahh, maybe he was just looking at the rack????? Guys, be honest, we ALL have had those type of moments with those type of females that when we were single, we were like "ahhh, why not".......[roll]

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

Why did it take so long for someone to post a pic.... have you monkeys forgotten the rules?

She looks like an O'Reilly reject.

I'll admit she isn't very attractive (would not) but have you seen Lumpy?