The offense was frustrating the hell out of us watching the game.
However fugly it was, the fact remains that MSU controlled the entire game from start to finish. We did alot of running the ball...tried to go wide with runs and screens often (slow developing plays with not enough speed or blocking). We went up the middle alot (again, not great effectiveness or powerful blocking). But then again, here we are at the end of the night with Dixon gaining 123 yards or so and a big win.
Was this Mullen's offensive game plan? We had very litte action working the middle of the field in the passing game (i.e. Marcus Green, etc.) ... didn't go downfield alot period. Was this the case of a wet game and Mullen planned to just mud one out with some conserative, clock-running offense and a defense that would hold Vandy at bay? And a special teams that would truly be the MVP?
Whatever it takes to get a W....... just wondering what the true vision of Mullen was for this game offensively.
However fugly it was, the fact remains that MSU controlled the entire game from start to finish. We did alot of running the ball...tried to go wide with runs and screens often (slow developing plays with not enough speed or blocking). We went up the middle alot (again, not great effectiveness or powerful blocking). But then again, here we are at the end of the night with Dixon gaining 123 yards or so and a big win.
Was this Mullen's offensive game plan? We had very litte action working the middle of the field in the passing game (i.e. Marcus Green, etc.) ... didn't go downfield alot period. Was this the case of a wet game and Mullen planned to just mud one out with some conserative, clock-running offense and a defense that would hold Vandy at bay? And a special teams that would truly be the MVP?
Whatever it takes to get a W....... just wondering what the true vision of Mullen was for this game offensively.