Kiss my ***. You know who you are.
What I said is sufficient. Notice how much better the run game looked once Kentucky started respecting the pass? Sellers just needed to settle, the OL hasn't been the problem. I knew this would happen if Sellers did his part. I was right. And you more than all the rest of them can especially kiss my ***.Lmao
No speech pretending to be "right" about something?
And now, I'm off to the insiders forum, because I want to be no where that I can see your self assured and wildly wrong drivel.Lmao
No long winded speech pretending to be "right" about something vague you never really commited to?
Go back to hiding on the pay side.
Your taking credit for the DL too? What a little b*tch!Kiss my ***. You know who you are.
Read the OP.Your taking credit for the DL too? What a little b*tch!
What I said is sufficient. Notice how much better the run game looked once Kentucky started respecting the pass? Sellers just needed to settle, the OL hasn't been the problem. I knew this would happen if Sellers did his part. I was right. And you more than all the rest of them can especially kiss my ***.
And yet, they're haven't been getting penetration after Sellers started hitting some passes. It's almost like I was right about how balance keeps the Defense from zeroing against the run.Our rushing game that hasn't hit 100 yards yet?
The OL is still a problem, and will be going forward.
And you, more than anyone can go crying back to the pay side because you cant handle your nonsense being made fun of.
Now, BYE.
We hurt you didn't we? We can tell.Read the OP.
And yet, they're haven't been getting penetration after Sellers started hitting some passes. It's almost like I was right about how balance keeps the Defense from zeroing against the run.
Read the OP. If yall are good be rude and disrespectful, not even entertain my reasoning, while your boy talks like I'm a moron, you can eat your medicine, candy ***.We hurt you didn't we? We can tell.
Read the OP. If yall are good be rude and disrespectful, not even entertain my reasoning, while your boy talks like I'm a moron, you can eat your medicine, candy ***.
Don't strain your *** b*tch. We tried to be nice but you were way too hard to get along with.Read the OP. If yall are good be rude and disrespectful, not even entertain my reasoning, while your boy talks like I'm a moron, you can eat your medicine, candy ***.
And Juju just gained 4 yards up the gut. That's what happens when the pass works. Kiss my ***.Your "reasoning"? That's a good joke. No, I don't consider anything you've spouted to be "reasoning ".
And you are a moron.
You are continuing to prove it now.
Yeah, Lurker had no interest. He got an attitude because I said I wanted to see how the pass fairs before I made predictions. I stand by it.Don't strain your *** b*tch. We tried to be nice but you were way too hard to get along with.
And Juju just gained 4 yards up the gut. That's what happens when the pass works. Kiss my ***.
Yeah, Lurker had no interest. He got an attitude because I said I wanted to see how the pass fairs before I made predictions. I stand by it.
Sack yardage and the game is still going. Again, if my argument is you need to put on the film to know wherein the problem lies, your argument doesn't hold water. You were sure we'd get walked and we're blowing them out, and I thought that I'd what would happen if only Sellers played well. It's happening.Have we even hit 100 yards yet?
You do seem to celebrate being wrong a lot.
Maybe no one notices.
You see, I really don't think I started it. You tried to nail me down when I said I wasn't comfortable with how many unknowns there are. You were rude as hell about it.Not really an accurate retelling of events.
I remember trying to explain to you what the smiley faces meant, and how we were all on the same side.
But your 100% jackass, and you really don't understand what a prediction is if you want to wait till after games are played to make it.
And I'm on the side of not denigrating the coaches and players before we know anything.Not really an accurate retelling of events.
I remember trying to explain to you what the smiley faces meant, and how we were all on the same side.
But your 100% jackass, and you really don't understand what a prediction is if you want to wait till after games are played to make it.
Then let it go. We should all be happy today.Yeah, Lurker had no interest. He got an attitude because I said I wanted to see how the pass fairs before I made predictions. I stand by it.
Sack yardage and the game is still going. Again, if my argument is you need to put on the film to know wherein the problem lies, your argument doesn't hold water. You were sure we'd get walked and we're blowing them out, and I thought that I'd what would happen if only Sellers played well. It's happening.
You see, I really don't think I started it. You tried to nail me down when I said I wasn't comfortable with how many unknowns there are. You were rude as hell about it.
I told you, I wasn't gonna guess what we'd get from the receivers and QB. I did guarantee we'll go bowling and had a ceiling of 9 if Sellers goes AA mode. What do you think, do we go to a bowl?I think you should reread that, you don't make much sense.
I wasn't sure we'd get walked, if you recall I said it was a tossup, and one of the two SEC games we had a shot at winning. (Besides Vandy)
But you can claim to be right once you wait till after the game to give your prediction. Good job!
I said what I was comfortable with with so many unknowns. After seeing Sellers play bad, you said we wouldn't beat Kentucky. Now that you see him play well, do you see why I left that open?You mean I tried to get you to back up your arguments by making a prediction a little less vague than "maybe 6, maybe 7, maybe 8, maybe 9 wins"?
Dont worry, you can wait till after the season is over to really settle on a prediction. Then you can whine about being "right" about it!
I'll tell you what I was wrong about. TAMU sucks. Guess that's one more good chance.You mean I tried to get you to back up your arguments by making a prediction a little less vague than "maybe 6, maybe 7, maybe 8, maybe 9 wins"?
Dont worry, you can wait till after the season is over to really settle on a prediction. Then you can whine about being "right" about it!
I told you, I wasn't gonna guess what we'd get from the receivers and QB. I did guarantee we'll go bowling and had a ceiling of 9 if Sellers goes AA mode. What do you think, do we go to a bowl?
And what would your reaction be if I said we blowout Kentucky if Sellers gets his head right and can throw?
What probably did it was our defense played so dominant that it took some pressure off the offense. Once the offense realized that the D can make up for a mistake, it loosens everything up.
But also, no one can deny that Sellers looked much more comfortable in the final 1/3 of the game. The first half he looked absolutely awful. If the version we saw in the 2nd half is what we get then we have a chance to be a 7-8 win team.
I talk matchups. I don't like talking totals, because of the variables. We could've been friends if that was good enough, but instead you were rude as hell. There was no reason my opinion wasn't good enough but for the fact you wanted to rub my nose in it if i said 8 and we only get 7.Exactly, you weren't going to offer a prediction.
That's pretty much the entire point.
You whined and cried that people should take your opinions as "fact". Then when called on it, you weren't even confident enough to give a prediction.
Now, while looking like a colossul moron for crying about people being mean to you on the internet, you want to try and argue you were "right" about a prediction you never had the guts to actually make.
As for my season prediction, I had either UK or A&M and the 5th win. We have a shot to go bowling if we take A&M.
What about you, the games are already being played. Are you working up the courage to come up with an actual prediction? Something a bit more than "maybe 6, maybe 7, maybe 8, maybe 9"?
He's also a Freshman.What probably did it was our defense played so dominant that it took some pressure off the offense. Once the offense realized that the D can make up for a mistake, it loosens everything up.
But also, no one can deny that Sellers looked much more comfortable in the final 1/3 of the game. The first half he looked absolutely awful. If the version we saw in the 2nd half is what we get then we have a chance to be a 7-8 win team.
Well its a BIG IF. But if the offense becomes an average SEC offense, we can beat Akron, Wofford and Vandy right? Thats 5. We would need 2 “upsets” but again, the way our D looked, if the offense can be reliable to hold their own, I could see 7-8 (that counts in a bowl win BTW, so 7-5 + a bowl win)Agreed up until the 7 and 8 part. But for the most part, yes.
And yet you are still. Even when you PROMISED to go back to the beginning at side. When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.I talk matchups. I don't like talking totals, because of the variables. We could've been friends if that was good enough, but instead you were rude as hell. There was no reason my opinion wasn't good enough but for the fact you wanted to rub my nose in it if i said 8 and we only get 7.
I just said don't dog the team, and I just said 6- wins was conservative if you actually look at returns and additions, and not just Rattler and XL. I have reasons to believe we'd be better than last year. I stand by every word of that. The only reason you gave for doubt was that we missed a bowl last year.
We blew out kentucky, off of one decent half, offensively. I wasn't gonna guess how fast and fast Sellers comes around. And you could've just left it at that, but instead you tried to call me out, and got rude and even insulting.
I only argued because you were bashing or staff, and that helps no one. There's no reason burying a man who isn't dead unless you're trying to kill him. My point wasn't how smart I was by predicting exact results. My only point was you weren't being fair to the players and staff. You needed to be right. I just want to see our guys supported.
But while we're at it, you can hold falling short of my floor against me, and I'll hold exceeding your ceiling against you. What did you say that was? 7 wins? How about that, 6 or 7 wins, we're nice to each other, and that can just be good enough for you. And then there's no reason for you to be an ***, just because I'm not meeting some arbitrary crap you just decided should matter. It's not up to you to decide I should suffer abuse for not giving a single number.
Shut up. I dealt with enough crap I really don't think I deserve from people who aren't you. So I'm reacting.And yet you are still. Even when you PROMISED to go back to the beginning at side. When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
I talk matchups. I don't like talking totals, because of the variables. We could've been friends if that was good enough, but instead you were rude as hell. There was no reason my opinion wasn't good enough but for the fact you wanted to rub my nose in it if i said 8 and we only get 7.
I just said don't dog the team, and I just said 6- wins was conservative if you actually look at returns and additions, and not just Rattler and XL. I have reasons to believe we'd be better than last year. I stand by every word of that. The only reason you gave for doubt was that we missed a bowl last year.
We blew out kentucky, off of one decent half, offensively. I wasn't gonna guess how fast and fast Sellers comes around. And you could've just left it at that, but instead you tried to call me out, and got rude and even insulting.
I only argued because you were bashing or staff, and that helps no one. There's no reason burying a man who isn't dead unless you're trying to kill him. My point wasn't how smart I was by predicting exact results. My only point was you weren't being fair to the players and staff. You needed to be right. I just want to see our guys supported.
But while we're at it, you can hold falling short of my floor against me, and I'll hold exceeding your ceiling against you. What did you say that was? 7 wins? How about that, 6 or 7 wins, we're nice to each other, and that can just be good enough for you. And then there's no reason for you to be an ***, just because I'm not meeting some arbitrary crap you just decided should matter. It's not up to you to decide I should suffer abuse for not giving a single number.
I talk matchups. I don't like talking totals, because of the variables.
Back to the OP. I didn't start the crap flinging you did.Good gracious. Were you actually crying while typing that?? You sound like a teenage girl whining about people being mean. Pathetic.
On this I completely agree. You don't like to talk totals, because then you'd have to actually back up your opinions.
Otherwise, you can talk for pages, spewing "facts" all day long, and end up really saying nothing. Sound familiar?
And the kicker is you are so desperate to get someone to acknowledge that you are "right", even when you never actually went out and made a claim to be "right" about.
You deserve all the crap you get.
Well its a BIG IF. But if the offense becomes an average SEC offense, we can beat Akron, Wofford and Vandy right? Thats 5. We would need 2 “upsets” but again, the way our D looked, if the offense can be reliable to hold their own, I could see 7-8 (that counts in a bowl win BTW, so 7-5 + a bowl win)