Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Bell Tolls for Thee" data-source="post: 132448843" data-attributes="member: 1812660">You didn't answer my question.&nbsp; Would you still hold this stance had he killed someone with this DUI?&nbsp; If not, how is it for any other reason than dumb luck that you hold 2 different standards.&nbsp; Had he been involved in a fatal DUI at 0.9 driving home from a local restaurant, I'd be more sanguine about his actions.&nbsp; Because in that hypothetical, his actions are not nearly as obscenely stupid and reckless as the reality.&nbsp; In that case he'd would be more unlucky in causing a death.&nbsp; In reality he is very lucky to NOT have killed someone.Legal and moral are 2 different things.&nbsp; A coach goes to jail for slugging some **** talking idiot in a bar, I give zero fvcks about it in a professional or moral setting.&nbsp; It's not a good look, but morally I think men in certain situations can be aggressive with one another and not be egregiously in the wrong for fighting.&nbsp; I also think there are things, not political things, but personal things men can say to one another that it is morally worthy of a slug in mouth.&nbsp; Legal definitions be damned.I fail to see how it is not hypocrisy to hold 2 different moral and professional standards for Huggins actions based upon how lucky he was.&nbsp; Same for having a different standard for Joe Blow with a previous DUI doing something so incredibly stupid just because he is not an accomplished ball coach.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Bell Tolls for Thee, post: 132448843, member: 1812660"] You didn't answer my question. Would you still hold this stance had he killed someone with this DUI? If not, how is it for any other reason than dumb luck that you hold 2 different standards. Had he been involved in a fatal DUI at 0.9 driving home from a local restaurant, I'd be more sanguine about his actions. Because in that hypothetical, his actions are not nearly as obscenely stupid and reckless as the reality. In that case he'd would be more unlucky in causing a death. In reality he is very lucky to NOT have killed someone. Legal and moral are 2 different things. A coach goes to jail for slugging some **** talking idiot in a bar, I give zero fvcks about it in a professional or moral setting. It's not a good look, but morally I think men in certain situations can be aggressive with one another and not be egregiously in the wrong for fighting. I also think there are things, not political things, but personal things men can say to one another that it is morally worthy of a slug in mouth. Legal definitions be damned. I fail to see how it is not hypocrisy to hold 2 different moral and professional standards for Huggins actions based upon how lucky he was. Same for having a different standard for Joe Blow with a previous DUI doing something so incredibly stupid just because he is not an accomplished ball coach. [/QUOTE]

Name