Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Message Boards
Rivals300
Recruiting Board
NIL Valuation
Transfer Portal
Andy & Ari On3
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
Ranking the top 10 offensive coordinators in college football
Inside the top quarterback battles of college football fall camp
5 college football teams projected as favorites in every 2025 regular season game
Marcel Reed reveals biggest lesson he learned from Peyton Manning this summer
Tennessee QB battle: Joey Halzle opens up on what he needs to see from starter
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Touissant enters portal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Bell Tolls for Thee" data-source="post: 132451145" data-attributes="member: 1812660"><p>That still doesn't answer the question. What is the point you are trying to make? Mine is clear. Your actions, be it intentional malice or reckless stupidity, should carry the same moral judgement regardless of outcome. I try to give examples because too many fail to understand this simple concept. Hence... </p><p></p><p>If I try to kill someone without just cause and fail, for whatever reason, I should still be judged morally as a murderer. Even if by criminal standards I cannot be charged as a murderer. Agree? Yes or no?</p><p></p><p>If yes, it woud then follow that if I do something far beyond the average in terms of reckless stupidity and avoid killing someone, I should still be judged morally as someone who commits manslaughter or negligent homicide.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Bell Tolls for Thee, post: 132451145, member: 1812660"] That still doesn't answer the question. What is the point you are trying to make? Mine is clear. Your actions, be it intentional malice or reckless stupidity, should carry the same moral judgement regardless of outcome. I try to give examples because too many fail to understand this simple concept. Hence... If I try to kill someone without just cause and fail, for whatever reason, I should still be judged morally as a murderer. Even if by criminal standards I cannot be charged as a murderer. Agree? Yes or no? If yes, it woud then follow that if I do something far beyond the average in terms of reckless stupidity and avoid killing someone, I should still be judged morally as someone who commits manslaughter or negligent homicide. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Touissant enters portal
Top
Bottom