https://rutgers.rivals.com/news/tracking-the-2023-rutgers-football-tv-ratings-week-three
Richie O Hall of Famer Staff member Mar 21, 2016 61,374 205,108 113 Sep 20, 2023 #1 https://rutgers.rivals.com/news/tracking-the-2023-rutgers-football-tv-ratings-week-three
RUTGERS95 Heisman Sep 28, 2005 26,513 35,754 113 Sep 20, 2023 #2 I'd say those numbers are very good all things considered
P PSAL_Hoops Heisman Feb 18, 2008 11,743 10,866 78 Sep 21, 2023 #3 In my opinion, an asterisk is needed under network for BTN broadcasts where the majority of NJ is getting it on overflow. It shouldn’t be presented as a regular BTN broadcast because we’d have gotten way more viewers if that was the case. Reactions: ScarletKid2008 and RUTGERS95
In my opinion, an asterisk is needed under network for BTN broadcasts where the majority of NJ is getting it on overflow. It shouldn’t be presented as a regular BTN broadcast because we’d have gotten way more viewers if that was the case.
RUTGERS95 Heisman Sep 28, 2005 26,513 35,754 113 Sep 21, 2023 #4 Rutgers needs to complain, start using her voice!
P Proud NJ Sports Fan Heisman May 11, 2010 72,487 56,950 0 Sep 21, 2023 #5 Week-3 can be thrown out since the Iowa game was on for a lot of viewers