So happy for Isaiah !!!
AlohaCat
AlohaCat
What's the chances of two triple doubles in 1 season? So cool man!!
Wonder if espn will comb the plays hoping to deny this one too?
What's the chances of two triple doubles in 1 season? So cool man!!
And it was a good dayBriscoe must of been messing around
I want sure who else would get the referenceAnd it was a good day
Didn't even have to use his AKI want sure who else would get the reference
They Hate us cause they anus. What else can you say.ESPN is already doing their thing on SportsCenter saying it was a wild finish in Oxford and then goes on to mention the intentional Miss by Willis so Briscoe could get his 10th rebound WITH A 25 POINT LEAD. Hinting at that not being ethical. It's no secret Willis missed intentionally but isn't there an Ole Miss player there also with inside position? ESPN truly does SUCK!
So happy, and proud for IB; that's quite an accomplishment, and something he can always cherish.So happy for Isaiah !!!
AlohaCat
Back then, was the broadcast crew even aware of these stats while calling the game. Was "triple/double" or "double/double" even a stat that was kept when Chris Mills got his?By the way, who did Chris Mills get his trilpe-Double against because I don't recall watching that game.
By the way, who did Chris Mills get his trilpe-Double against because I don't recall watching that game.
I think he could get another one this season. He's consistently a great rebounder and passer, and with the pace this team plays, there are many shots to go around to get rebounds and assists. And he can still score the ball (isn't that such a wonderful phrase?) very well, too.
Oh, they're not done .What's the chances of two triple doubles in 1 season? So cool man!!
Amazing that it hadn't happened in nearly 30 years
and then two different players on the same team.
There's still plenty of time to get Bam one!
You can call it how you want, but several years ago ESPN ripped an NBA player for a similar act. I would have preferred for Briscoe to have got his 10th rebound in an actual play.ESPN is already doing their thing on SportsCenter saying it was a wild finish in Oxford and then goes on to mention the intentional miss by Willis so Briscoe could get his 10th rebound WITH A 25 POINT LEAD. Hinting at that not being ethical. It's no secret Willis missed intentionally but isn't there an Ole Miss player there also with inside position? ESPN truly does SUCK!
Ever heard of Oscar Robertson.Back then, was the broadcast crew even aware of these stats while calling the game. Was "triple/double" or "double/double" even a stat that was kept when Chris Mills got his?
You can call it how you want, but several years ago ESPN ripped an NBA player for a similar act. I would have preferred for Briscoe to have got his 10th rebound in an actual play.
You will always have 2 camps. One will say what a great game AND he got a triple-double. The ther will overlook the game because the last rebound of the triple-double was basically given to him.
Just depends on which camp you want to put yourself in.
Given? He had outside position on the FT line and the Ole Miss player didn't let him step in and have it. Willis may have missed intentionally but he fought for the boardYou can call it how you want, but several years ago ESPN ripped an NBA player for a similar act. I would have preferred for Briscoe to have got his 10th rebound in an actual play.
You will always have 2 camps. One will say what a great game AND he got a triple-double. The ther will overlook the game because the last rebound of the triple-double was basically given to him.
Just depends on which camp you want to put yourself in.