So "convenient" to name unnamed sources. Impossible to verify, impossible to deny. Clever.
Meantime named sources revealed in "shattered" which I'm reading now go on the record with specific details on how Hillary screwed up that campaign BIG TIME, including cooking up the whole "Trump colluded with Russia" caca after her inexplicable loss and the MSM hasn't even mentioned them or this book!
Now just be objective and ask yourselves who you trust more? Folks willing to put themselves on the line and be quoted for their story, or "unnamed sources" who throw political molitov cocktails (like this Trump releasing classifed info story) and then hide?
Who do you believe?