Lots of MO on offense. Should have gone for it.
F FlabLoser Redshirt Aug 20, 2006 10,709 0 0 Sep 15, 2012 #1 Lots of MO on offense. Should have gone for it.
thatsbaseball All-American May 29, 2007 17,804 6,473 113 Sep 15, 2012 #2 No, they have the better team and will win in OT
A AROB44 Junior Mar 20, 2008 1,385 227 63 Sep 15, 2012 #3 Cheesedick is seeing his life flash before his eyes Nm
Dawg1976 All-Conference Aug 22, 2012 8,085 2,586 113 Sep 15, 2012 #4 Agree. If they were barely hanging in there, probably. But they have all the mo going.
F FlabLoser Redshirt Aug 20, 2006 10,709 0 0 Sep 15, 2012 #5 thatsbaseball said: No, they have the better team and will win in OT Click to expand... Auburn has an all-world FG kicker. They need to remove him as an option. You give AU a short field when you kickoff because that guy can probably put one in from 60.
thatsbaseball said: No, they have the better team and will win in OT Click to expand... Auburn has an all-world FG kicker. They need to remove him as an option. You give AU a short field when you kickoff because that guy can probably put one in from 60.
karlchilders.sixpack All-Conference Jun 5, 2008 19,660 3,749 113 Sep 15, 2012 #7 ULM has the confidence factor. I would not have gone for two either.
F FlabLoser Redshirt Aug 20, 2006 10,709 0 0 Sep 15, 2012 #8 BOOM. 43% accurate kicker. Why go to OT with that. They should have gone for 2.
Dawg1976 All-Conference Aug 22, 2012 8,085 2,586 113 Sep 15, 2012 #9 Now I say they should have gone for 2.
karlchilders.sixpack All-Conference Jun 5, 2008 19,660 3,749 113 Sep 15, 2012 #10 Role the dice and take your chances. Hindsight is generally perfect.
O OleYeller Redshirt Aug 23, 2012 700 0 0 Sep 15, 2012 #11 I still think it was the right call. ULM had the better team
QuaoarsKing All-Conference Mar 11, 2008 5,792 2,399 113 Sep 15, 2012 #12 Going for 1 was fine, but they shouldn't have tried the FG in OT.
