United promised regulators in 2014 that ticketed passengers are guaranteed seats

Best Virginia

Redshirt
Feb 17, 2017
525
0
0
Taking a page from the Trump handbook "The Art of Lying For Profit", United blatantly lies to regulators.

Less than three years before a passenger was forcibly removed from one of its aircrafts, United Airlines assured federal regulators that all ticketed passengers are guaranteed seats on flights. The promise was delivered in federal filings reviewed by International Business Times.


In September 2014 comments to federal officials, the Chicago-based airline outlined its opposition to proposed rules that sought more disclosure of the fees airlines charge to customers. One of the rules at issue was designed to compel airlines to more explicitly disclose fees charged for reserving specific seats.


“Including advance-seat-assignment charges among the ‘basic ancillary service’ fees that must be disclosed as part of initial fare displays makes no sense,” the airline wrote to the Department of Transportation. “Every ticket, of course, guarantees a passenger a seat on the plane, with no additional mandatory seat-assignment charges."


Later in the filing, United Airlines expanded on its promise to regulators that it guarantees every ticketed passenger a seat.


“Importantly, every passenger who buys a ticket on a United flight or a flight on any of United’s partners or competitors in the United States will be assigned a seat at no additional charge (though in some cases this will still happen at the gate),” the airline wrote. “Therefore, the rule does not need to prescribe how carriers must disclose charges concerning advance seat assignments because passengers need not purchase this service to receive a seat assignment.”


United has faced withering criticism—and calls for a congressional investigation—after video surfaced of a passenger being forcibly removed from a flight from Chicago to Louisville, Kentucky. United issued a statement saying its flight was “overbooked” and asserting that “after our team looked for volunteers, one customer refused to leave the aircraft voluntarily and law enforcement was asked to come to the gate.”


The company’s CEO, Oscar Munoz, later apologized for having to "re-accommodate these customers.”


Federal rules do not prohibit airlines from overbooking flights. Despite United's assurance to federal regulators in 2014 that it guarantees seats for all ticketed passengers, the fine print of the airline’s “contract of carriage” agreement on its tickets says the company retains a right to bump passengers off flights for myriad reasons.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,033
1,975
113
Taking a page from the Trump handbook "The Art of Lying For Profit", United blatantly lies to regulators.

Less than three years before a passenger was forcibly removed from one of its aircrafts, United Airlines assured federal regulators that all ticketed passengers are guaranteed seats on flights. The promise was delivered in federal filings reviewed by International Business Times.


In September 2014 comments to federal officials, the Chicago-based airline outlined its opposition to proposed rules that sought more disclosure of the fees airlines charge to customers. One of the rules at issue was designed to compel airlines to more explicitly disclose fees charged for reserving specific seats.


“Including advance-seat-assignment charges among the ‘basic ancillary service’ fees that must be disclosed as part of initial fare displays makes no sense,” the airline wrote to the Department of Transportation. “Every ticket, of course, guarantees a passenger a seat on the plane, with no additional mandatory seat-assignment charges."


Later in the filing, United Airlines expanded on its promise to regulators that it guarantees every ticketed passenger a seat.


“Importantly, every passenger who buys a ticket on a United flight or a flight on any of United’s partners or competitors in the United States will be assigned a seat at no additional charge (though in some cases this will still happen at the gate),” the airline wrote. “Therefore, the rule does not need to prescribe how carriers must disclose charges concerning advance seat assignments because passengers need not purchase this service to receive a seat assignment.”


United has faced withering criticism—and calls for a congressional investigation—after video surfaced of a passenger being forcibly removed from a flight from Chicago to Louisville, Kentucky. United issued a statement saying its flight was “overbooked” and asserting that “after our team looked for volunteers, one customer refused to leave the aircraft voluntarily and law enforcement was asked to come to the gate.”


The company’s CEO, Oscar Munoz, later apologized for having to "re-accommodate these customers.”


Federal rules do not prohibit airlines from overbooking flights. Despite United's assurance to federal regulators in 2014 that it guarantees seats for all ticketed passengers, the fine print of the airline’s “contract of carriage” agreement on its tickets says the company retains a right to bump passengers off flights for myriad reasons.


Best Virginia explains his reasons for posting this article mentioning Trump with United Airlines:

"So tell me when I said Trump's a "liar" or an underhanded snake in the grass just like that greedy selfish United Airlines which is only interested in taking people's money and then screwing them just like Trump?"

Did I say that? Where in that article does it even suggest that Trump is as dishonest as United Airlines?" " Show me where I implied that, or even suggested it"?

"Stop telling lies on me!" You don't know that I even read that article to make such a suggestion. How do you know if what is being implied in this article I even believe? You are assuming I actually read the article and believe what it says. I didn't have time to fact check every claim made in this article, so how do you even know if I know that it's even true?

I don't!

Stop assuming I read every article I post, and stop assuming I'm saying things about Trump that may or may not be true. You can't know what I'm suggesting by posting this article, because you don't know how much of it I've read or how much of it is true. I didn't check out every detail, and I have no way of knowing if everything it says is true. I just posted the information, and I don't care if it is probaly 100% false. I don't read everything I post OK?

You have no right to assume I know anything about this article, United, or Trump because if you do you are a liar and are making things up about me. For all you know this article is bogus. If I don't know it's legit, how do you?

Stop it! I know I don't know anything more about Trump or United beyond what's written in this article, so stop lying on me assuming that I do!

I already told you not to assume I know anything about anything, why don't you listen to me and stop lying about me pretending I know more than I already said I don't know?