Toggle sidebar

University study finds that up to 800,000 illegal votes cast in last election

C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
W

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
countryroads89 said:
He is saying it is "plausible". He didn't say it actually happened and they have the evidence.

“Is it plausible that non-citizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes,"

You might want to change the title of your thread since it is incorrect.

Keep trying.
Click to expand...

This is an independent study. Plausible sounds like good enough evidence to me for an investigation. Why are liberals so afraid of an investigation? If no fraud is revealed, you have nothing to worry about.

My. strong hunch is that libs are scared because they in their hearts know that this kind of fraud exists. After all, Dems have that kind of history.
 
W

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
JMichael said:
The Washington Times and the National Enquirer are about the same.
Click to expand...

Let my try and wrap my mind about the thought process for liberals. The Wash Times reports on a study that shows these findings. You did not dispute the study itself. You claimed the Wash. Times was illegitimate.

Even if you are right, which you aren't, shouldn't you try and discredit the study since the study exists and came to these findings?

Aren't you attacking the messenger, not the message?

I will never understand the liberal mind I guess.
 
W

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
moe said:
Really? That's what you have for us? Surely you can do better.
Click to expand...

Please enlighten he board on why the study is so flawed as to be useless. After all, the study certainly, at least, shows the need for an investigation. Wy are you afraid of an investigation? If you're right and there is no fraud or corruption, you have zero to worry about and we can put this to bed.

If however, the Dems are once again cheating as they have done before, most famously in the 1960 Presidential election, then we take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that citizens votes are not canceled out by illegal votes.
 
M

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,528
150
63
WVPATX said:
Please enlighten he board on why the study is so flawed as to be useless. After all, the study certainly, at least, shows the need for an investigation. Wy are you afraid of an investigation? If you're right and there is no fraud or corruption, you have zero to worry about and we can put this to bed.

If however, the Dems are once again cheating as they have done before, most famously in the 1960 Presidential election, then we take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that citizens votes are not canceled out by illegal votes.
Click to expand...
Why do you invent stuff? (lie) huh? Why would I be afraid of an investigation? Did I say I was? Of course not but you love to suggest other people's points of view or just flat out lie about what they might be thinking. I guess that approach makes your post sound better but at the expense of any tiny shred of credibility that you may still have left. Trump is welcome to "investigate" this sh*t out of this if Congressional Republicans will approve/endorse (pay) it. I'll be very surprised if they find anything of substance. There's a big difference between a county here or there making a mistake and fraud, fraud is done on purpose. Let me know when you find millions of fraudulent ballots but of course they'll probably never see a ballot because most county and/or state governments have no interest in doing recounts for this failed fishing expedition.
 
dave

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
JMichael said:
The Washington Times and the National Enquirer are about the same.
Click to expand...
That is probably one of the dumber things posted here ever. Even if your tripe were true though, the story is entirely about a study done at ODU so your beef is with them and not the messenger.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,944
1,861
113
JMichael said:
The Washington Times and the National Enquirer are about the same.
Click to expand...

Enquirer broke Hillary's health issues, Bill Clinton's Lewinskis, John Edwards' "Baby Momma" and Gart Hart's "Monkey Business".

CNN, and NYT initially refused to cover any of those, then ignored them, then denied them, until Enquirer reporting forced them to eventually admit all were true.
 
Last edited:
W

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
moe said:
Why do you invent stuff? (lie) huh? Why would I be afraid of an investigation? Did I say I was? Of course not but you love to suggest other people's points of view or just flat out lie about what they might be thinking. I guess that approach makes your post sound better but at the expense of any tiny shred of credibility that you may still have left. Trump is welcome to "investigate" this sh*t out of this if Congressional Republicans will approve/endorse (pay) it. I'll be very surprised if they find anything of substance. There's a big difference between a county here or there making a mistake and fraud, fraud is done on purpose. Let me know when you find millions of fraudulent ballots but of course they'll probably never see a ballot because most county and/or state governments have no interest in doing recounts for this failed fishing expedition.
Click to expand...

You posted this:

"Really? That's what you have for us? It's a bunch of guessing. Surely you can do better."

That certainly sounds like you don't believe the study ergo, why have an investigation. If you are in favor of an investigation, I stand corrected.

And see, you chastise me, but you don't read. I never said millions of fraudulent votes, in fact in my very first post, I said the opposite. Talk about credibility being lost.

As I posted, Dems have cheated before and it cost Nixon the 1960 election. With so many dead people still on the rolls, so many illegal alien with government issued ID's, illegals voting is not far fetched.

BTW, the independent analysis and use of polling is not "guessing." Would you like to correct that erroneous statement? And you talk about my credibility.
 
W

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
atlkvb said:
Enquirer broke Hillary's health issues, Bill Clinton's Lewsinskis, John Edwards' "Baby Momma" and Gart Hart's "Monkey Business".

CNN, and NYT initially refused to cover any of those, then ignored them, then denied them, until Enquirer reporting forced them to eventually admit all were true.
Click to expand...

The amazing part to me is that the poster attacked the paper for simply printing the results of the study. He didn't seem to understand that he attacked the messenger not the message. It's like he accuses the Wash Times of making up the study even thought they cite the professors and the results with quotes from the professors. Amazing.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,944
1,861
113
WVPATX said:
Let my try and wrap my mind about the thought process for liberals. The Wash Times reports on a study that shows these findings. You did not dispute the study itself. You claimed the Wash. Times was illegitimate.

Even if you are right, which you aren't, shouldn't you try and discredit the study since the study exists and came to these findings?

Aren't you attacking the messenger, not the message?

I will never understand the liberal mind I guess.
Click to expand...

They did the same thing on the Wiki Leaks. Never mind the corrupt e-mails talking about Blacks, Jews, Spics, and denigrating almost every one of their precious constituents.

No, the bad guys were the Russians who hacked the e-mails.

They don't care that Obama was out there encouraging illegals to vote (he was interviewed telling them they had nothing to worry about) or that most of those fraudulent votes went to Democrats, no they're upset that Trump wants to investigate it.

Unreal.
 
M

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,528
150
63
WVPATX said:
I never said millions of fraudulent votes
Click to expand...
Did I say you said that? of course not, your mentally unstable fearless leader said that. I'll get back to your "study" soon but when "extrapolation" is used to arrive at findings then you don't have much of a "study".
 
W

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
moe said:
Did I say you said that? of course not, your mentally unstable fearless leader said that. I'll get back to your "study" soon but when "extrapolation" is used to arrive at findings then you don't have much of a "study".
Click to expand...

You don't even read or maybe comprehend your own posts. You posted this:

"Let me know when you find millions of fraudulent ballots but of course they'll probably never see a ballot because most county and/or state governments have no interest in doing recounts for this failed fishing expedition."

As I said in my first post: "Trump's ridiculous claim of millions is ridiculous."

Why your post since I acknowledged that millions was ridiculous? As for the study, extrapolations are done all the time in studies like this one. We use polls all the time and they too are scientific within a margin of error.

Regardless, you're not opposed to a study so it is a moot point. Have at it and see what we get.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom