Trump didn't really believe the election was stolen. His OWN JUSTICE DEPARTMENT told him that was BS. His ego was hurt and he pushed a lie because he knew his cult following would believe it. This, as with most fiascoes where Trump is concerned, was all about his ego.They know ?? Hahahaha. Caca made my day with the most Trumpian comment to date. Trump knows the truth.. BAWAAAAAAA, Puleeseeesees
How do you know what Trump believes? Republicans believe , as an article of faith, that democrats are pass masters of voter fraud. The Chicago Mayor Bill Daley is famous for his admonition, "Vote early--and often". Lyndon Johnson is known as "landslide Lyndon" for a cemetary supported 10 vote win in his first congressional contest. Richard Nixon believed that Kennedy's win in 1960 was caused by Bill Daley cheating in chicago which fliped illionis and won the election for Kennedy. It was Nixons paranoia about voter fraud that was the genesis for watergate.
I believe he lied to a lawyer to the FBI. Tiny loophole that went ignored by media. I wouldn't be surprised if Durham set Sussman up for acquittal. The DC swamp is deep.
You're debating with a fake conservative Marxist liberal democrat. She's totally consumed by her TDS beyond anything ever seen before.
Your laughing emoji speaks volumes.People are losing faith in the credibility of government officials. From local levels all the way up to D.C. From school board members and teachers up to Senators and Cabinet Secretaries. They don't care about what the people want, they care only about their personal preferences and agendas.
We just watched a verdict of not guilty be given to a DNC lawyer who was granted office space inside the FBI?????????? The "jury" had three Clinton donors, an AOC donor, and a woman whose daughter is on the same sports team with Sussmann’s daughter. The foreman of the jury came out after the verdict and stated, "We could have used our time more wisely". Because lying to the FBI is no big deal. Uhhhhhh seriously.
Top Dem Law Firm Perkins Coie Gave FBI Office Space in Their DC Headquarters: Matt Gaetz
Conservative newsman Tucker Carlson revealed on his program last night that Perkins Coie, the Democrat-aligned law firm that was instrumental in the 2016 Clinton campaign’s efforts to discredit President Donald Trump, has given office space to the FBI in its Washington, D.C. headquarters...miamistandard.news
Maybe .................
What do I call that? Absent a better explanation of what these people are claiming, I call that nonsense from a source that's become completely unreliable (the NYT).
I do believe it's being reported today that 19,000 ballots past the due date were illegally counted in Maricopa County.
So because "Republicans believe, as an article of faith, that democrats are pass masters of voter fraud" that means Trump actually won? Well that settles it, then. SMH Newsflash: Neither party is innocent of voter fraud. It happens with random people and there have already been plenty of Trumpers who have been charged and/or admitted to voter fraud in 2020. None of it was on a scale to change the election. Stop acting like GOP's poop doesn't stink. ^Gotta love the last line, too. The cheating democrats made us break in and spy on them! Today's GOPers are always projecting.
I consider myself a conservative because I believe in the constitution, rule of law, family values, personal accountability, our role as the world's leader in standing up to autocrats etc. I'm laughing because you guys have had everything invested in Durham and now that the guy is acquitted you want to pretend there was some giant conspiracy --- as you tend to do with everything. There is no longer any objective truth. Anything you don't like isn't true just because "thuh libruls."
I didn't say that belief translated into fact, I just stated that it was their belief and cited a few crooked democrats to embelish my assertion. Now having said all of that you will be hard pressed to find a republican counterpart to Boss Tweed, Bill Daley, Tip O'Neil, etc.
And yet you laugh at an obvious stacking of the jury. You stand in solidarity with the Clinton's (who control massive wealth and political sway) who are the very autocrats you say you're against. You decry parents voicing their displeasure at curriculum and teachers expounding on sexual matters even at an early elementary age. You are pro abortion.
Air, have no idea wtf your word salad means. If there was fraud , there was no proof so you lose. SO WAS THEIR VOTER FRAUD ? Can you answer yes or no ? Yes I'm small minded , I'm a frickin lizard. See sh-t in black and white and see no need to post the same stuff over and over and over again.
Air , this is the stupid sh-t I'm talking about. If it can't be proved then there is a conspiracy. Same old bs.
I'm not sure how familiar you are with the jury vetting process. If you're on trial, no judge in their right mind is going to allow your child's friends parents to be on the jury. Or someone who gives donations to your client.
LOL -- Projecting onto democrats what republicans have done goes back to the 19th century:
www.smithsonianmag.com
1) I've never been in solidarity with the Clintons. I was opposed to the Clintons back when Trump was putting them in the front row at his wedding and giving Hillary 100K.
I'm not sure about Virginia law, but aren't both parties limited to a certain number of peremptory challenges? Additionally, didn't the news about the juror's daughter come out after the verdict? As a rule jurors are not vetted and if a prospective juror doesn't disclose information it is not learned. This was key information and Durham might be able to present an argument for juror misconduct.
Teaching sexual issues, including transgenderism to young children is hardly a “non-issue”.
It goes mostly one way. A much higher percentage of republicans as opposed to democrats are independently wealthy on entering politics. Human nature being what it is guarantees that Democrats are more crooked.LOL -- Projecting onto democrats what republicans have done goes back to the 19th century:
Near the campaign's close a suspicious Indiana railway postal agent intercepted one of the incriminating missives. Newspaper headlines followed. Dudley and Quay rallied to blast the Democratic "forgery," and Dudley slapped libel suits on the newspapers that printed it. The vote buying rolled on. Party faithful even brought voters over from Pennsylvania, which was safely in Harrison's column. With the whole nation watching, Dudley brazenly bought blocks of votes in Indiana. But instead of going to prison, where his personal knowledge of Dudley’s doings could have put him, Harrison went to Washington.
The Vote That Failed
Old style ballots cast illegally in Indiana helped topple a president then he helped topple them
Politics is corrupt. Stop pretending that goes one way....or ever has.
Equating incidental conversations with "teaching sexual issues" is the issue. Government intrusion into parental decisions regarding treatment for transgenderism is pro big government and anti-family values. Accepting children for who they are is pro-life.
You mean, the same Justice Department that had just participated in a soft coup attempt against him? Seriously?
Perhaps. But a remarkable number of his "fiascos" have turned out to be just what Trump said they were.
Here's the Hobby Lobby Appreciation Day Page. It was started in Dec. 2012 to organize citizens against the Obama HHS mandate forcing Hobby Lobby to cover forms of birth control considered abortifacients. Although I didn't start the organization, I was made an manager of the page because of my prolific advocacy. As you can see, it has been pretty dormant since SCOTUS sided with Hobby Lobby, but I am still a moderator of the page:
www.facebook.com
What about it do you not understand? Each year every Senator and Congressman has to reveal his net worth and it constituate parts. As a homework project(for extra credit) you can look them up and do the accounting your self. What is really eye opening is the amount of wealth they accunulate , over time, while in office
Except that the law didn’t prohibit “incidental conversations” or answering casual questions, It prohibits teaching it.
Yeah right. Show me evidence based on my statement that it is not true. Take your time. Google is your friend. Are you and Aimee a couple. She seems to follow you around like a puppy dog. Even your syntax is the same. Your sophomoric statements are right out the script from Valley girls. You are pure comedy. Thanks. I needed a laugh today.They know ?? Hahahaha. Caca made my day with the most Trumpian comment to date. Trump knows the truth.. BAWAAAAAAA, Puleeseeesees
You aren't even responding to the same subject being discussed. The subject was the claim made by the author of an article, which was that REPUBLICAN voters rejected Trump and Trump's candidate. DaFire also pointed out other aspects of the article reflecting the significant bias of the author, but my response had to do specifically with the fact that in an open primary state, it's next to impossible to make the kind of definitive claim about REPUBLICANS the author made.
Not at all. It was the claim that he was rebuked BY REPUBLICANS that's the problem. As you very well know.
I thought you had me on ignore, Colonel. No, he and I are not a couple, not do we coordinate on anything. Unlike you, I do not use sock puppets and never have. But, since you've decided to bring me into it, here is your evidence:
apnews.com
Laughing is her way of coping in her reality. She laughs at a lot of things inappropriately. All I see is her laughing imoges. I guess I am the lucky one. I used to look to see the babbling comments she would make. Luckily I have her on ignore and not going to allow myself to read her nonsense. I will leave it to the rest of you. She will respond to my post in short order. She cannot help herself as she has to have the last word....4...3...2...1....LMAO
Now how on earth can I have the last word with a guy who claims to have me on ignore, and is therefore not conversing, but can't seem to stop talking about me? Hmmmmmm.......
I feel for you, Soggy. English is haaaard.
Why are you bringing up fraud? We were addressing your claim that the Arizona audit was a "fiasco." Why are you changing the subject?
Yes, there was.
I can, and I did. Yes, there was election fraud.
That's the interesting thing about the word "conspiracy," soggy. It doesn't imply that elements of the conspiracy are untrue.
Since you believe that Trump is such an obvious liar I give you a montage sampling of Biden's lack of veracity that goes back decades. He is both a liar and a plagiarizer. You and Soggy and your other little ha ha friend feast on this.
Watch this video which was one of several shown to 8-year old 3rd graders in Glendale.
Arizona's Atty Gen. said no fraud in 2020 but NOW THERE IS FRAUD so he can get the Orange clowns endorsement.
