Alright guys, you may not like my prediction so let's hear yours.
I predict Vandy wins 24-17. Ralph Webb has a big day and VU controls the line of scrimmage.
What's your prediction?
You have Vandy's defense scoring 3 touchdowns?VU 31
UK 17
If it makes you feel better, you'll score at least double that average against us. I just hope and pray that we win and continue to improve. I'm tired of starting over.I don't disagree much of this, but I will say we have more talent on offense than we've shown, we just have an absolutely awful head coach. Derek Mason has tried to copy what Stanford has done out west (where he was DC), but he's too stupid to pull it off. We have a young QB with some talent (Shurmur), but the offense is too slow developing and plodding to see him doing what he's capable of. We have a couple of WR's that have some real talent in Lipscomb and Sherfield, but again, everything is slow developing and our scheme is easy to defend. We have a very talented group of TE's, but the OC doesn't do anything to get them the ball.
As you alluded to, Webb appears to be all we have and sadly, the proof is in the production. Ralph Webb is the real deal and our offensive line is pretty solid, so Webb gives us a chance to compete, but overall, we are dealing with a head coach and OC that have no real idea how to score points.
I think we are averaging 7.66 ppg against P5 teams...
Yikes..
Both the teams that scored big on them had coaches that believe in running high octane offenses...MS does not.In an odd twist Vandy is holding SEC opponents to 13 ppg (though both were home games) and OOC opponents have gone nuts on them for 31 ppg (the 2 higher scoring games were on the road).
While I would like to think we can score on Vandy I don't see us putting together more than maybe 3 scoring drives. Hopefully we can keep them out of the endzone as well. I'll be optimistic and say UK wins 17-6.
Belief...running clock to keep the defense off the field instead of ATTACKING the other team...they All want low scoring "defense controlled" games.What is the mental blockage that keeps these defensive coaches from having even a average offense? Muschamp, Mason and Stoops all seem unable to put even a average offense on the field.
They have to study the offense in order to defend against it. Is it just lack of interest? Do they not even want to TRY to have a passable offense?
What is the mental blockage that keeps these defensive coaches from having even a average offense? Muschamp, Mason and Stoops all seem unable to put even a average offense on the field.
They have to study the offense in order to defend against it. Is it just lack of interest? Do they not even want to TRY to have a passable offense?
I got to watch Vandy against WKU and I was not impressed.
If the defense continues to play like they have, I look for a couple of take aways. If we stop the run and make them pass, we could easily come away with a couple of picks. Vandy's QB puts too much air under his passes and lofts them up there. Against WKU, there were about 2 or 3 that should have been picked.
Taking Cats 24-10
It could be the kiss of death if Vandy has to use a backup QB (I guess Vandy's starting QB got hurt somehow against UF). UK has a way of making backup QBs look like All American candidates. Hope the starter for Vandy is back...it's probably the only QB that the UK coaches planned for.
We beat Western Kentucky FYI. Should have lost but we won in OT.
Frieda..
You guys won't cross the 50.
Vandy 0
UK 27