LSU has done something similar things in the past. Each state legislator has a ss they can award to anyone in their district.
Texas has the same thing, it can even go to out of state students.
LSU has done something similar things in the past. Each state legislator has a ss they can award to anyone in their district.
Still don't understand why we can't do something similar. We just spent nearly $70 million on our baseball stadium, surely we can find a way to put some money aside for scholarships. If the NCAA is allowing this loophole and if we're serious about a championship, we have to find a way to be competitive here. Get creative Cohen!
THey don't have more athletic scholarships. They just supplement their 11.7 with grants through Opportunity Vanderbilt. They just have to massage it a little to avoid what's called, "counters", which are what you call guys who get a partial athletic scholly supplemented by other forms of aid. The loophole, as I understand it is, they don't have to count any grants awarded if they don't give any athletic scholly money to the student.
The NCAA is aware and have made statements admitting the advantage it gives schools like Vandy, but have decided the rules allow for more schools with fewer resources to have a chance to field competitive teams. They want parity and are just willing to accept the advantage it gives Vandy in favor of the "greater good".
So, Vandy is held to the same scholarship limits, but they have a way to compensate well beyond what other schools do that do not count vs their 11.7.
How in the world was Rocker only drafted in the 38th round? Did he just tell all the teams not to bother, that he was going to college? A big dude like he is that can throw with that velocity? He would normally go in the top 2 rounds.
It works for Vandy in baseball because of the scholarship restrictions. D1 football can offer full ride scholarships to the entire team. If the NCAA tried to limit scholarships to the same degree they do baseball, they'd ruin their cash cow, and get a ton of heat for taking away college opportunities for minorities.So why doesn't the NCAA look to level the playing field in football?
Also what gives Vandy a leg up is that athlete can receive the need based money without being held the same entrance academic standards as the student population
Nothing about football or basketball will ever be considered a level playing field. Scholarships may be the same but the rules are different for an elite few just as in baseball where an elite few have found a loopholeAll I am asking is why can’t we have a level playing field advantage n NCAA baseball, like we supposedly have in FB And basketball?
Because the NCAA has not figured out a way or motivation to check Vandy that does not make it harder for many more schools to be competitive. They have stated publicly they know this helps Vandy in particular, but are OK with it because it helps hundreds of other schools be competitive.All I am asking is why can’t we have a level playing field advantage n NCAA baseball, like we supposedly have in FB And basketball?
So why doesn't the NCAA look to level the playing field in football?
Also what gives Vandy a leg up is that athlete can receive the need based money without being held the same entrance academic standards as the student population
This seems to be a real hot topic fueled by misinformed national writers. Please take a second and read about Opportunity VU. The program began in 2008 (post David Price, Pedro Alvarez, etc). Every student attending Vanderbilt is eligible for it.
https://www.vanderbilt.edu/financialaid/docs/Fall2019FinAidBookley.pdf
“There is no specific income that will automatically qualify a family to receive need- based aid at Vanderbilt. Income is only one consideration when determining eligibility for need-based financial aid. Other significant factors include, but are not limited to family size, number of children in college, private elementary and secondary tuition expenses, and family assets.”
There is a long list of schools that offer this type of aid to all students including Southern Cal, Notre Dame, Northwestern, Rice, Ivy League schools, the Service Academies, Duke, and others. Even UNC and UVA do something.
https://www.cappex.com/articles/match-fit/need-blind-admission-colleges
Many players and students in general still have to take out loans. Even Dansby Swanson had to take out student loans to attend Vanderbilt.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.tennessean.com/amp/28513899
Opportunity VU leveled the playing field for the program when comparing its cost of attendance to the public schools with which it competes. Now most have to pay an amount similar to instate tuition.
A) Just who specifically did I call a name?
B) I also said I do return insults once the other party throws them out. Haven't been very successful, "turning the other cheek". Once the other guy starts the BS, I allow myself to treat them like a POS from them on, unless they apologize and offer to start over. In my book, the one who first decides to be an *** is the one who needs to set things right. That's what I did with Engie, and that's my code. I fully recognize that most on here don't have a, "code". Codes may be old-fashioned, but never out of style.
That said, I've occasionally decided to, "pull it in anyway" if the aforementioned trolls just stop behaving like dicks. Don't respect them, but don't go out of my way to be nasty either...at least for some. Plenty of times conflict is the result of misunderstanding or miscommunication. One party posts something the other party perhaps reads tone into, or another party decides the other is somehow being pretentious or egotistical just because he's not throwing enough, "aint's", or 17's around, or something similar.
Rocketdawg has made a point of mentioning I tend to use decent grammar/vocabulary. Some may read that as me trying to be, "hoity-toity", but it's not. It's just the way I talk, probably because I traveled the world quite a bit when I was young, going to schools overseas, etc.
I'm sure there are many who resent me because, when I believe something, I'm not shy about voicing my opinion, and then defending my position vigorously in debate. I can most definitely become argumentative, which can be really frustrating and irritating to some, but that's more on them than me, as long as I'm not being disrespectful in the way I respond to them. Convince me I'm wrong and I'll admit it and change, but if you can't convince me, you shouldn't expect me to just roll over and give in, just to save your feelings. Most of us here are grown men and women, and should be mature and decent enough to not be jackasses to anyone who hasn't been one to us first. But that's not how it works, so we all have to accept this for what it's worth, hopefully getting enough out of it to enjoy it and continue participating.
In any case, that's how I feel about it, FWIW. Thank God I don't look to this or any message board for any sort of personal validation or sense of worthiness. That would be truly pathetic.
A) Just who specifically did I call a name?
B) I also said I do return insults once the other party throws them out. Haven't been very successful, "turning the other cheek". Once the other guy starts the BS, I allow myself to treat them like a POS from them on, unless they apologize and offer to start over. In my book, the one who first decides to be an *** is the one who needs to set things right. That's what I did with Engie, and that's my code. I fully recognize that most on here don't have a, "code". Codes may be old-fashioned, but never out of style.
That said, I've occasionally decided to, "pull it in anyway" if the aforementioned trolls just stop behaving like dicks. Don't respect them, but don't go out of my way to be nasty either...at least for some. Plenty of times conflict is the result of misunderstanding or miscommunication. One party posts something the other party perhaps reads tone into, or another party decides the other is somehow being pretentious or egotistical just because he's not throwing enough, "aint's", or 17's around, or something similar.
Rocketdawg has made a point of mentioning I tend to use decent grammar/vocabulary. Some may read that as me trying to be, "hoity-toity", but it's not. It's just the way I talk, probably because I traveled the world quite a bit when I was young, going to schools overseas, etc.
I'm sure there are many who resent me because, when I believe something, I'm not shy about voicing my opinion, and then defending my position vigorously in debate. I can most definitely become argumentative, which can be really frustrating and irritating to some, but that's more on them than me, as long as I'm not being disrespectful in the way I respond to them. Convince me I'm wrong and I'll admit it and change, but if you can't convince me, you shouldn't expect me to just roll over and give in, just to save your feelings. Most of us here are grown men and women, and should be mature and decent enough to not be jackasses to anyone who hasn't been one to us first. But that's not how it works, so we all have to accept this for what it's worth, hopefully getting enough out of it to enjoy it and continue participating.
In any case, that's how I feel about it, FWIW. Thank God I don't look to this or any message board for any sort of personal validation or sense of worthiness. That would be truly pathetic.
Public universities are subject to more rules than private ones with regard to when and how scholarships and grants are awarded. We are required to offer up detailed financial reports, whereas private schools can tell public officials/govt folks to pound salt.
Most private schools are still for profit, and responsible to a board, as well as internal rules of compliance, but Vandy has made the commitment to offer full grants to everyone accepted based on their formula for determining a family's ability to pay, explained in greater detail above. They no longer have to justify why they are giving so much grant money to athletes because they offer it to every student who qualifies. They don't have to worry about running afoul of Title IX for the same reasons. They officially only give out 11.7 baseball scholarships per year.
They are the last people who want to see baseball scholarships increased.
Why the scholly advantage is allowed by the NCAA/SEC is beyond me. Congrats Dores. Hope you’re proud of your unearned advantage. 27 full schollies vs. 11.7!
You're the worst name caller here. All you do is criticize.Admittedly I haven’t paid much attention to your posts before yesterday and won’t give them much time going forward. But it was pretty obvious to me - and pretty much everyone else except you - that you acting like a jack *** doesn’t seem to require provocation. Having said that, I would agree with you that when someone does fan your flames even ever so slightly, it doesn’t take long for you to go completely off the deep in.
i hope you have a better day today than yesterday.
4. Most Vanderbilt athletes are going to Peabody College, not Vanderbilt University.
He's saying they aren't going through the same rigors the other students do, which is true to an extent, but not as big of a discrepancy as he says. Therein lies Vandy's limitation. They have to get kids into school. It's the same thing that hurts them in football. So what they end up with is really smart kids on their baseball, most of them really rich who can pay their way, or really poor and get the big scholarships.This is the second time I've heard this over the past few days. What exactly does this mean? The Bagley College of Engineering is still a part of Mississippi State University. Is Peabody similar? If so, I wouldn't think anyone would feel the need to make that distinction. Can someone clear this up for me?
Worked out pretty well for the Coast, Natchez and Vicksburg.Yeah, sounds similar to how they sold us casinos. How'd that work out?**
However good or bad they are, is not due to funding.I can tell by how much better the schools are.**
Hey guys, here’s a hard truth:
Yes, Vandy has ways around the 11.7, but frankly, so do we. We use them every year, all the time.
We aren’t losing recruits because they can’t afford to come to State. Our recruiting is at the top of the game every year and will only get better now that the new DNF is a showpiece.
The reason we can’t beat Vandy is that they have an established coach who knows how to recruit (and sign) elite pitching. Elite.
We’re heading in that direction, but yesterday we matched up a guy who a year ago was on his way out of baseball against a soon-to-be top 5 pick in the MLB draft. We brought a knife to the gunfight...a really sharp knife, with a long blade made of Valerian steel, but...still a knife.
However good or bad they are, is not due to funding.
Sorry, poor phrasing on my part I reckon. Yes all schools have 11.7 baseball scholarships. MSU and Auburn are, to the best of my knowledge, the only two CWS teams to have no way of supplementing this number.
How did they assemble the 2007 team, that was arguably their best team talent wise?The "Opportunity Vanderbilt" fund campaign was launched in 2008. Their first CWS appearance in school history was 2011. This is the key to their success. How they get away with it? I have no idea.
I’m well aware they’re allowed to have more but why does the NCAA allow it? The NCAA’s sole job is to promote the integrity of college athletics by keeping an even playing field.
Also I always assumed the scholarship limits in baseball are based in Title IX. Title IX is a federal directive right? Vandy should be held to that standard just the same as everyone else as that goes well above the lowly NCAA. It just doesn’t make any sense.
Well heck, EVERY school has ways around the 11.7 because EVERY school can use other scholarships other than the 11.7 to supplement. The issue is Vandy has many more ways around it because they have a large endowment to draw from to provide scholarships and they aren't accountable to the State like a public school would be to ensure that the same non-athletic scholarship they are providing an athlete is available to any student. So lots of money with no checks and balances equals BIG advantage.
Maroon and White Football
"Defense is doing their part, it's on us as an offense": Anthony Evans III speaks on offensive struggles
Rivals Basketball Recruiting
Recruiting Intel: Latest buzz, frontrunners and predictions for the top remaining 2027 prospects
Maroon and White Basketball
"Adjust on the fly": Mississippi State HC Chris Jans speaks on opening night win
Maroon and White Basketball
Mississippi State 106-88 Tennessee Tech: Hubbard and Grace lead the way in high-scoring opener
Maroon and White
Points of Focus: Lebby speaks on offensive reworking ahead of Vanderbilt week