Vegas Say About OSU
- Thread starter 121Josey
- Start date
Certainly based on their current QB situation. Then again, they were underdogs against Wisconsin.
What did you not see in that list? Michigan State. Don't know if that was an omission on Dan's part, but if not...
Not based on current QB because that guy looked better throwing than JT Barrett.
something looked fishy about the running attack of wisconsin. all of a sudden, someone that could do 400 in a game looked like he was just happy to not get hit very hard at all. the school cashed a check.
wisconsin wins that game (as the odds and everything looked like) and the big 10 loses out on the playoffs. no amount of whining and crying from barry alvarez and tom osbourne would have had wisconsin jump everyone and their mother into that fourth spot.
wisconsin wins that game (as the odds and everything looked like) and the big 10 loses out on the playoffs. no amount of whining and crying from barry alvarez and tom osbourne would have had wisconsin jump everyone and their mother into that fourth spot.
Yep. They laid down. I say Urban give a big thank you at the handshake after the game. Very fishy.
No doubt they did. I don't know if the fix was in or Wisconsin just quit after they got behind, but it says a lot when you can't just dismiss the theory that the game was fixed. A 35-7 win would have been a lot more impressive than 59-0 was. But I guess it worked. TCU or Baylor has good reason to be pissed.
I didn't watch this game, so I can't say anything definitive, but when you look at how well Wisconsin had been playing, how unimpressive OSU has been at times against weak opponents, and the fact that OSU had just lost their starting QB, 59-0 just doesn't smell right.
add more stinky fish...wisconsin coach resigns to take oregon state position.
i dont blame him, if i was told my team needed to lay down id bolt.
i dont blame him, if i was told my team needed to lay down id bolt.