You can expect a nineteen year old to do the things that he is doing. The good thing is that we have him for a few more years. And he's only going to get better.a few non-expert observations (from me):
* GW generally he did a good job of not forcing things (threw a lot of balls out of bounds).
* obviously GWs accuracy could be better but I'd rather he throw balls away then force things (see bullet above)
* the WRs made a few REALLY good catches
* it was not DPI on the taunting play. that ball was not catchable (waaaay too high). but how was that flag picked up? he pushed the WR well after the play and then did a demonstrative hand motion in the WRs face - ref calls it and then picks up flag? truly, WTF?
* the Michigan line would repeatedly try to bait the OL into false starts. the play at 4:36 in the video is particularly egregious. isnt that illegal? the OL did a good job not falling for it.
The DL doing the shift and clap- I noticed it all game but can't see where it could be a penalty.
The taunting- very strange to be picked up- as it WAS taunting
Interesting enough, my original thought on the INT for TD is that GW never should have tried to run down the guy and that the possible block to the back was a non issue. Watching again, that really was a blocking to the back- it should have been called.
GW is far from perfect but he is well beyond where I thought he would be. Making throws we havnt made in years and making smart plays- when he decides to run and throwing the ball away.
Another player that really needs major props after 80% of this fan base wrote him off and thought he was not a D1 player - Dremel has stepped up and made some very P5 plays this year. So many were so wrong
We could have timed that so we knocked them off their feet when they shifted.Thats no penalty on the DL.
As long as they dont cross into the neutral zone they can do anything they want.
Not unless they move forward into the neutral zone.We could have timed that so we knocked them off their feet when they shifted.
1-Bad, off
2-Good, complete
3-Tood/great TD!!!,
4-Good, complete
5-Good, 1st Down
6-Good
8- Bad, dangerous
9--PI
10--Good- throwaway
11--Good/great- sideline
12- Good- slightly out of bounds
13-Good/great
14--Good/OOB
15-Bad- high
16--Good/great
17--Bad- INT, but great play by Michigan
18--Good screen, dropped by Bowman
19--Good complete
20--Good complete
21--Good- complete
22- Good- pressure- dropped
23- Bad- off mark, or did receiver run wrong route
Only have 5 "bad" passes of 23 thrown, and arguably only 4 were bad. Overall, progressing and a good game by Gavin!!!
Are you speaking of throw aways for the entirety of the season? There was only one on Saturday and that was a good one. I do think that there were a couple in other games that he didnt see a secondary WR that was open.I assume all of your "good" vs "bad" ratings are relative to the current state of his development. if so, I agree.
however, a number of those throwaways were not "good" per se (a more skillled QB is able to make those throws) but considering where he currently is skill wise - I agree, most of those were "good" decisions to throw away (rather than force)
Are you speaking of throw aways for the entirety of the season? There was only one on Saturday and that was a good one. I do think that there were a couple in other games that he didnt see a secondary WR that was open.
What I also look at are the throws he is also making. He had 3 sideline throws that were great. He has also been hitting guys in stride- the obvious one to Dremel this week but a couple of great leads to RB's out of the backfield in other games.
And for the first time in years- the ball leaves his hand and I actually think we are more likely to catch the pass than not.
I agree with both of your previous posts and love that both really should just be great conversation on GW. Thank youbottom line - the kid has shown undeniable improvement over last year in every respect.
If he continues to improve throughout the year and continuing on after, given his natural talent, good things could be ahead
Last year many here were (rightfully) questioning whether he would ever “get it” - now he is basically a smart “game manager.” That’s a big step. And hopefully, in time, he is able to better utilize his natural talents. In the mean time I don’t have a problem with him as a smart game manager
He made some pretty good throws, and some clunkers, and seems to just need some time to mature. It's refreshing to see passes downfield after so many years of short, short passes.You can expect a nineteen year old to do the things that he is doing. The good thing is that we have him for a few more years. And he's only going to get better.
It's not necessarily just neutral zone. You cannot simulate an act which induces the offensive lineman to move. They can't do anything they want; you can't call out a similar cadence or feint, clap hands, bob head or abruptly flex arm and leg movements causing the offensive line to move. They're flirting with the rule when they have the entire line shift lateral every down and they know that.Not unless they move forward into the neutral zone.
Frankly, it was based on quick review and just winging it. See more below.I assume all of your "good" vs "bad" ratings are relative to the current state of his development. if so, I agree.
however, a number of those throwaways were not "good" per se (a more skillled QB is able to make those throws) but considering where he currently is skill wise - I agree, most of those were "good" decisions to throw away (rather than force)
The first throw (bad) was in the vicinity of Langan. Maybe bad is unfair, maybe it's fair. Looked like Washington COULD have been an option or he could have rolled out further, but I was not standing there with 330 lb lineman running at me.Are you speaking of throw aways for the entirety of the season? There was only one on Saturday and that was a good one. I do think that there were a couple in other games that he didnt see a secondary WR that was open.
What I also look at are the throws he is also making. He had 3 sideline throws that were great. He has also been hitting guys in stride- the obvious one to Dremel this week but a couple of great leads to RB's out of the backfield in other games.
And for the first time in years- the ball leaves his hand and I actually think we are more likely to catch the pass than not.
It's not necessarily just neutral zone. You cannot simulate an act which induces the offensive lineman to move. They can't do anything they want; you can't call out a similar cadence or feint, clap hands, bob head or abruptly flex arm and leg movements causing the offensive line to move. They're flirting with the rule when they have the entire line shift lateral every down and they know that.
I agree with both of your previous posts and love that both really should just be great conversation on GW. Thank you
So- my response, with the above being my point- I think he is much more than a game manager. And this is my one current issue with Greg. There is never a time that I think he gives offense freedom.
Rutgers is coaching offense this year like it is the previous 3-4 years.
Gavin has shown some great decisions and he as shown his arm and some really good throws. Yes, he makes mistakes but he SHOULD be anything but a game manager going forward.
We are going to be 6/7 wins at best and 5 wins is house money for Greg if we continue to show...
Let's see what a GW airshow could look like. For the first time- we have WR's running good routes and making some spectacular catches. We have a ground game that has to be respected.
Let the kid open up and maybe even make mistakes. THIS is the year to do it. I would think he still would be on the positive side of TD's/TO's.
GW- has been used as a game manager and in the first part of the season- it was "show me" for him. I see no reason not to let him air it 25-30 times a game now.