Vote results are tomorrow
- Thread starter mc140
- Start date
No more districts. Only proposal to fail was shortening summer contact to 20.
https://www.ihsa.org/NewsMedia/Anno...d-as-Member-Schools-Approve-10-Proposals.aspx
https://www.ihsa.org/NewsMedia/Anno...d-as-Member-Schools-Approve-10-Proposals.aspx
Not surprised districts were overturned but I am surprised at how convincing the change in direction was from the membership. Was expecting a narrow margin .
Number 2 is a good one. I remember the wrong player getting ejected because the numbers were similar. 79 got ejected when 74 should have been ejected. It will be nice to be able to at least appeal the decision.
Montini had a high level player ejected in a first round game a few years back against Ignatius. Total BS and nothing could be done to stop the suspension.
We have to pass it to see whats in it?
Well we saw what it would look like.
We rescinded it.
Shame Washington doesn't work this way.
Well we saw what it would look like.
We rescinded it.
Shame Washington doesn't work this way.
Simply put. Districts would have caused more issues then it solved.
I don’t see this really changing anything since there aren’t enough cameras at game to get a really good view of what goes on so I would assume the IHSA would defer back to the on the field official. I see this like the NFL pass interference challenge, great idea but doesn’t really change anything.
Did the IHSA put out a proposed district projection to schools? If not, how would we know what it would have been?
If you're basing your thoughts about district projections on Soucie or others who have a mock district projections, that is not fair. Nothing against Soucie or others who give projections, but it is not official or coming from the source that will do the actual scheduling.
Proposal 25 (passed 470-215-16): Permits schools an opportunity to appeal a player ejection when the player was ejected as a result of the misapplication of a playing rule by an official.
Purely objective and not subjective. In the past, wrong numbers were reported for ejection and tape proved otherwise. When defenseless player contact and illegal helmet contact were in their infancy, players were being ejected by officials on the first offense without being deemed flagrant, similar to the college rule. That was a misapplication that was not subject to appeal. Judgement situations will be affirmed, i.e. fighting.
Purely objective and not subjective. In the past, wrong numbers were reported for ejection and tape proved otherwise. When defenseless player contact and illegal helmet contact were in their infancy, players were being ejected by officials on the first offense without being deemed flagrant, similar to the college rule. That was a misapplication that was not subject to appeal. Judgement situations will be affirmed, i.e. fighting.
Yes they did. And I believe that was the beginning of the end when most schools saw what the possible reality would be.
I had that big tilt with Juarez circled
There was no explanation as to how the multipliers and success factors work. That right there would change everything.
