Welp,
- Thread starter HI Cock1
- Start date
Yes, really. Not sure how a gamecock fan can pull for UT over Vandy.
Last edited:
In pretty much every other case I'd agree with you.
But Pavia shouldn't even be playing. He's like 37 years old.
No, he just sues when he doesn't get his way. I think I heard a little blurb today that's he's suing AGAIN for yet another year of eligibility. It's absurd.
At any rate, it appears they're headed for a first round loss in the playoffs.
He is winning on and off the field! Good for him.
Ok, but at what point does it end?
At some point in time, people have to learn what the word "No" means. IMHO, that day cannot get here soon enough. And hypothetically, what happens if his "rulings" are overturned by a higher court?? Vandy's record will be wiped clean.....wins vacated, and all the other players hard work rendered meaningless, simply because some kid wouldn't accept "No" ... it's beyond selfish.
I guess we disagree.
I don't disagree with you. That said, if I could do what he is doing, I would do it. They are not going to vacate wins.
Would you car if we had to vacate wins from our '84 team due to steroids? At that place in time it was great. After the fact...whatever.
27 and probably still dating 19-21 yr olds. That's why he would sue for another year of eligibility.He's only 27, which is much more like a college player