What conspiracy theory do you believe in?
- Thread starter BigSexyCat
- Start date
Glenn's takes are only mediocre.
That the administration was running arms from Libya to rebels In Syria which has been covered up but provided the singular motivation to
Overthrow Ghaddafi - who had turned over a new
Leaf and was totally cooperative with the west.
Overthrow Ghaddafi - who had turned over a new
Leaf and was totally cooperative with the west.
LBJ was an active participant in the JFK plot.
Too much smoke, he would have been indicted in TX had he not become president and JFK was actively considering replacing him on the 64 ticket.
Too much smoke, he would have been indicted in TX had he not become president and JFK was actively considering replacing him on the 64 ticket.
I've always felt like JFK wasn't willing to handcuff the African American community for the sake of votes and they killed him for it. LBJ was the start of of what the Democratic party is today.
Governments work with aliens at Dulce New Mexico.
Moon is hollow and contains many bases. Both alien and earth government bases.
There are still "people" living on mars underground
Moon is hollow and contains many bases. Both alien and earth government bases.
There are still "people" living on mars underground
Oswald killed Kennedy. Rubenstein was a Kennedy sycophant.
The FBI should have had Oswald and not the Dallas Police.
The FBI should have had Oswald and not the Dallas Police.
I believe in the conspiracy theory that the old media (NBC, CBS, ABC, NYT, Washington Post, etc.) are in collusion with the democrat party to push their agenda and to help get their candidates elected. Thanks to Wikileaks this theory has been proven beyond a doubt.
I've never believed the government's theory on the JFK assassination. There was way too much smoke to take their basic views at face value.
I believe that as well. They get to portray the "hero" storyline to avoid people freaking out that the government killed civilians. We know they had to but you know how that narrative would go. The public couldn't handle something like that so we got this narrative.
The only problem with that theory, is the wreckage. IF the site of the "crash" is what can be found on videos and pictures doing a google search then the shot down plane theory is a long shot. The crater and lack of evidence indicates the plane made a vertical dive straight into the ground at an extremely high rate of speed. If you examine other aviation disasters where airliners nose dive into the ground you will see the wreckage looks almost identical as far as imprint.
If the plane was shot out of the sky the odds of the vertical dive are slim. You would expect to see more of an angled decent and more wreckage over a greater distance. Not saying it isn't possible, but odds aren't in that theory's favor.
Yeah, people would understand, but then there would be public outcry. We were at war at that very moment. You weigh the lives of a few hundred vs few thousand. There is no choice, as someone will die. Just always seemed clear as day we shot it down.
Yeah, thats not really debunking the theory in multiple ways. Learn conspiracy theories.
I wasn't debunking...go take a midol. You're cranky when you're on your period.
Whoa, easy there snowflake. Sorry you got so easily offended. I wasnt upset.
I believe that the BFRO crew of Finding Bigfoot have actually found bigfoot but they are not going to tell us.....once again this season. It sucks because the suspense is killing me.
Last edited:
JFK's head was blown apart by a secret service guy accidentally firing his gun as he reacted to Oswald's shots.
That guy shoulda been fired for doing that
Some folks hate oil cans, others hate cars and just have really unfortunate aim.
Many of the jfk conspiracies are bizarre, but there is one jfk conspiracy/issue that seems almost universally recognized as baffling. The testimony,drawings, and evidence of those who worked on jfk at parkland vs. the medical reports/autopsy/X-rays/photos performed at Bethesda. They r completely distinguishable from one another. Shouldn't our most learned witnesses have some semblance of consistency in their findings?
If u took all of the "evidence" on both sides and looked/compared them to one another, a reasonable person would think it is 2 different people/crimes. I have always been fascinated or baffled by this
If u took all of the "evidence" on both sides and looked/compared them to one another, a reasonable person would think it is 2 different people/crimes. I have always been fascinated or baffled by this
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't his body transferred to another casket once they left parkland? I seem to recall the casket that left Texas wasn't the same one that arrived at Bethesda.
The Emery worker was paid by someone (probably from UCLA) to find that mysteriously opened box that brought down UK basketball.
The other one is that Steven Avery was framed by the police department to avoid the huge lawsuit.
Last edited:
Don't know if it went that far but I guarantee you they knew that if they came out of their base and engaged US troops it would not be nice on them.
Newer theory on Hitler is that he and several others escaped and found a safe haven in a secret base in Antarctica.
I thought they were on the far side of the moon? And that they're coming back next year?
This one has ALWAYS seemed fishy to me...think it was a setup too. I would like to think we had perfected the occasional payoff by the 80s. This just seemed like amateur hour.
**** like this isn't even worthy of being called a 'theory'. A theory has some evidence to back it up. This should be called what it is...horse ****. Hitler knew he was going to be f'ed hard when he was caught and took the easy way out.