What just happened in the market?

Status
Not open for further replies.

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
18,971
14,922
113
I am a little confuse they are now saying 90 pause on all tariffs except China.
 

dawgman42

All-American
Jul 24, 2007
5,804
5,412
113
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,030
25,029
113
TRump lowered all tariffs to 10% for 90 days but raised the tariff on China to 126%. That is his version of **** You China. The market jumped 2400 points in like 5 minutes.
Did anyone honestly expect this to turn out much different than this? Everyone always freaks out over Trump's bluffs and blustering, and then it usually turns out OK. There's a lot of reasons to not like Trump, but his economics and foreign policy aren't two of them.
 

johnson86-1

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2012
14,169
4,697
113
Just a friendly heads up, I’m about to take some money off the table and move it into some bonds. That’s probably going to guarantee this bump turns into a new rally. Just wanted to give yall the opportunity to load into equities and benefit from me making what based on past experience will definitely turn out to be the wrong decision.
 

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
18,971
14,922
113
Did anyone honestly expect this to turn out much different than this? Everyone always freaks out over Trump's bluffs and blustering, and then it usually turns out OK. There's a lot of reasons to not like Trump, but his economics and foreign policy aren't two of them.
Leavett just confirm the tariff are still a flat 10% across the board while negotiations go on but China is getting hammered.
 

John Deaux VII

All-Conference
Jun 7, 2024
904
2,222
93
Everything jumped at the same time
Trump posted on "Truth Social" that he was raising the Chinese tariffs to 125% and putting all others on a 90 day hold.

What an assclown. I don't understand how anyone with a ounce of common sense can think that this is a good way to implement trade policy, or any type of policy for that matter.
 

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
18,971
14,922
113
Just a friendly heads up, I’m about to take some money off the table and move it into some bonds. That’s probably going to guarantee this bump turns into a new rally. Just wanted to give yall the opportunity to load into equities and benefit from me making what based on past experience will definitely turn out to be the wrong decision.
You know there are a lot people who said in a loud voice "DAMIT I should have bought in".
 

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
18,971
14,922
113
Trump posted on "Truth Social" that he was raising the Chinese tariffs to 125% and putting all others on a 90 day hold.

What an assclown. I don't understand how anyone with a ounce of common sense can think that this is a good way to implement trade policy, or any type of policy for that matter.
The tariffs are still in place. Just lowered to 10%.
 

Darryl Steight

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
3,694
6,193
113
Musk won. Trump backs off tariffs.
Maybe, or this could be what Trump has been aiming for the whole time. I don't think we know yet. There were indications since January that tariffs were largely a threat to get everyone else to the table and (hopefully) to kneecap China. Jury is still out on whether it's going to work, but I am glad he at least took a breath here today. I'd say we all needed it.
 

BoDawg.sixpack

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2010
5,327
2,784
113
Trump is trying to front-run some political posturing ahead of China's invasion of Taiwan. He's firing an economic salvo in hopes of averting a shooting war..basically a stern warning..IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon Pug

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
9,834
5,496
113
Maybe, or this could be what Trump has been aiming for the whole time. I don't think we know yet. There were indications since January that tariffs were largely a threat to get everyone else to the table and (hopefully) to kneecap China. Jury is still out on whether it's going to work, but I am glad he at least took a breath here today. I'd say we all needed it.
I think our other customers might have been positioning away from us instead of playing ball so we have to keep that from happening. Saw a headline that despite stock market sucking hard the 30 years treasury prices were falling - which is counterintuitive and would make the refinancing of our debt a lot more difficult. Someone fact check me on that part though - it was a headline and I didn't get in the weeds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crazy Cotton

Dawgzilla2

All-Conference
Oct 9, 2022
1,946
2,294
113
I said in a locked thread that the tariffs would not be in place a month from now. I was wrong, since I should have said a week.

Is there any reason Trump could not have accomplished the same goal without tanking our markets first and freaking everyone out? Just threaten tariffs and open the lines of communication?

Heck, he has both houses of Congress; just introduce tariff legislation so it's all legal, and negotiate while the bill is pending.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DawgInThe256

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,792
6,419
113
Trump is trying to front-run some political posturing ahead of China's invasion of Taiwan. He's firing an economic salvo in hopes of averting a shooting war..basically a stern warning..IMO.
We'll have a major confrontation with China in 2026. IMO
 

Curby

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2012
1,433
1,267
113
Paused tariffs for 90 days on countries that are cooperating.

China will continue to be stubborn, but they need us to sell all their crap that is stocked on the Wal-Mart shelves.
 

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
9,834
5,496
113
I said in a locked thread that the tariffs would not be in place a month from now. I was wrong, since I should have said a week.

Is there any reason Trump could not have accomplished the same goal without tanking our markets first and freaking everyone out? Just threaten tariffs and open the lines of communication?

Heck, he has both houses of Congress; just introduce tariff legislation so it's all legal, and negotiate while the bill is pending.
He's a reality tv star. He doesn't know boring and methodical. Gotta be the center of attention - good or bad.

Congress probably likes it bc they can do even less work and if it fails just blame it on Trump. Most people are too apathetic to understand Congress punted away their tariff responsibilities decades ago anyhow.
 

Darryl Steight

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
3,694
6,193
113
I think our other customers might have been positioning away from us instead of playing ball so we have to keep that from happening.
Definitely possible. I do think the thing Lutnick was talking about factored into this too - that China has and would again use other countries as a straw man to make purchases. To me that seems at least a plausible reason he had to start with "tariffs on everyone!" then work back down after speaking to each country individually. Like I said, I don't think anyone really knows, but I could actually see that being a strategy. MAYBE. 🤷‍♂️
 

johnson86-1

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2012
14,169
4,697
113
I said in a locked thread that the tariffs would not be in place a month from now. I was wrong, since I should have said a week.

Is there any reason Trump could not have accomplished the same goal without tanking our markets first and freaking everyone out? Just threaten tariffs and open the lines of communication?

Heck, he has both houses of Congress; just introduce tariff legislation so it's all legal, and negotiate while the bill is pending.
Then he couldn’t have bought the dip after the panic.**
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,792
6,419
113
"Is there any reason Trump could not have accomplished the same goal without tanking our markets first and freaking everyone out?"
Well it would be interesting to see who made money off of this gigantic "whipsaw" .
 

Darryl Steight

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
3,694
6,193
113
Is there any reason Trump could not have accomplished the same goal without tanking our markets first and freaking everyone out? Just threaten tariffs and open the lines of communication?
My answer to this - if I was a Trump spokesperson - would be that bluffs don't really work well when the opposing player knows you're bluffing.

Seems to me that (Trump's thinking is that) he had to follow through with it, to show China he was serious. You can only say "Just watch me, I'll DO IT" so many times before it becomes obvious that you're not really going to do it.
 

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
9,834
5,496
113
Definitely possible. I do think the thing Lutnick was talking about factored into this too - that China has and would again use other countries as a straw man to make purchases. To me that seems at least a plausible reason he had to start with "tariffs on everyone!" then work back down after speaking to each country individually. Like I said, I don't think anyone really knows, but I could actually see that being a strategy. MAYBE. 🤷‍♂️
Very well could be the strategy. It makes sense on paper as a negotiating tactic anyhow. But if it was, I think he underestimated how likely it could be for key players to reorg and plan on relying on us far less. Basically a "fine then, we'll take our own short term pain and find a way to move on in the world without your crazy *** in it". Who really knows what's happening on calls and in the room? I don't care - just make something that makes sense happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,792
6,419
113
Paused tariffs for 90 days on countries that are cooperating.

China will continue to be stubborn, but they need us to sell all their crap that is stocked on the Wal-Mart shelves.
China has to be given a way to make it look like they won (or at least broke even) before they will "cooperate".
 

She Mate Me

All-American
Dec 7, 2008
11,980
9,654
113
Trump posted on "Truth Social" that he was raising the Chinese tariffs to 125% and putting all others on a 90 day hold.

What an assclown. I don't understand how anyone with a ounce of common sense can think that this is a good way to implement trade policy, or any type of policy for that matter.

It doesn't look like anything we've ever done before.

The other ways got us $36.7 TRILLION in debt.

That seems a bit assclown to me. Also cuntshit stupid.
 

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
9,834
5,496
113
It doesn't look like anything we've ever done before.

The other ways got us $36.7 TRILLION in debt.

That seems a bit assclown to me. Also cuntshit stupid.
Our economy and position in the world has been fine. We're in debt bc Congress (both sides) loves to spend money but not tax people enough to pay for it. That's what happens when you allow it to be a career via no term limits and corrupted by corporate donations. Congress is a business venture not a civic institution that makes adult and responsible decisions.

You could argue that much of our debt is from war and world policing/influence. And you'd be right. But we should have thought about how to finance that on the front end instead of potentially crapping on the entire global economic order in the process in an unclear attempt to get it back. That seems like a self own - unless you're a wealthy person that has never been laid off or struggled through recession. They preach "temporary pain/long term gain" but won't have to live through it. They'll come out wealthier somehow while normies have to suffer through it for them.
 

615dawg

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
6,545
3,412
113
We're about a week from people putting Chinese flags on their social media just to protest Trump.

China sucks. I hope we raise our tariffs on them to 500%. We don't need to be doing business with them. They are evil and have manipulated us for too long. We have to crack down on them using other countries to do their bidding as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.