What's Hillary's plan to stop ISIS?
- Thread starter EERs 3:16
- Start date
Have any of the GOP presidential candidates ever served as SOS? Or on any foreign intelligence committees? Just wondering.
So all we have to do is serve now? Doing a decent job isn't even a requirement.
My guess is they are waiting on Hillary to pick a position and then take the exact opposite as that seems to be almost guaranteed to be the correct response considering her record of choices.
Lets use the Cheney / Bush plan ..................that solved nothing. GOPCandidates talking about barring all Muslim refugees, I'm sure that is what ISIS wants. Meanwhile the G7 leaders are meeting at our Muslim NATO ally, Turkey. It isn't black and white and we are in it together with Europe
So, Hillary doesn't have a plan and you're blaming Bush for that? Now that's a creative approach.
So you're ok with letting migrants into the country knowing that we have no way to vet them? You can't possibly be this stupid. You do know that one of the Paris assassins was a migrant, right?
Let's be honest here. We have to do something, doing nothing is not an option unless you are ok with continued genocide.
But letting unvetted migrants into the country is not the answer either. Almost guarantees the death of innocent Americans. I would much rather create a safe zone in Syria or some other strategy.
I suggested throwing holy water on them and holding a bible up screaming "The Power of Christ compels you!!" and if they didn't burst into flames or projectile vomit, then they were good. My other one was requiring them to hug a Jew but then people like RPJ might also get deported.
Many intel people that I have seen on most of the news shows,NOT FOX, have said that most of them cannot be vetted because of the complete lack of any records on them in Syria and other Middle Eastern countries. What is your suggestion on how to vett them, do you just want to take them at their word?
I think I saw something like that in a movie once ... maybe you saw it too?
There is no vetting system that's going to be 100% reliable (although I have to say that the hug-a-Jew method is probably pretty close), but to suggest we don't have any way to vet them is absurd. I'm not a fan of turning them all away. They are victims (or potential victims) of genocide.
Hey moron, how do you vet them? Many don't have papers. Some have papers that are fradulant (e.g. the migrant that was part of the Paris terror team). Some have passports taken off of dead bodies. Many migrants aren't even from Syria. Do you ever read?
A Daily Mail reporter just bought a fake Syrian passport. Very easy to do so. It took him just 4 days to buy the fake passport.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/11/flashback-fbi-no-way-to-vet-incoming-syrian-refugees-video/
http://drrichswier.com/2015/10/08/u...ecurity-no-way-to-vet-muslim-syrian-refugees/
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/15/europe/paris-attacks-passports/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-suspected-Paris-terrorist-travel-Europe.html
Last edited:
Damned if you don't make good arguments for your position. My mother always won arguments by saying "I told you", or something in that line that was intended to stop the discussion. No other human has risen to that level in my world.
Everyone with a brain knows she did. Only question is if Obamas AG will prosecute. Please show your stupidity by further defending that fat *****.
Some people on here will understand why I've left it where I did ... you don't ... and I don't care whether you do or not.
There is no arrogance in what I said, I have legitimate reasons that have nothing to do with ego. As I said, some will understand them, some won't, and I don't care who does and who doesn't. It isn't arrogance to call out your ignorance of the situation, especially in defense of your attacks. If I was driven by arrogance, I would have taken a very different course in this conversation.
I've stated numerous times that I'm no fan of Obama and never voted for him ... but as usual, you ignore what doesn't fit your preconceived and ignorant notions and keep on with the same rhetoric despite all evidence that it's wrong. No wonder you like WVPATX so much. Two peas ...
You would think they would be close with RPJ as well just different ends of the spectrum.
I reserve the right to see with my eyes rather than listen to your arrogant rhetoric that is too frequently the opposite of what you obviously do. Take your word for it? No thanks, and take it or leave it suggestion, I will leave it. But thank you for the outstanding offer that you make.
Example: I have never voted for a conservative politician. Take it or leave it.
Says the guy that isn't intelligent enough to know that France is fighting ISIS in Africa and Afghanistan. You're too stupid to realize you are stupid.