Alot of people are insinuating that Mullen has hit his plateau and we are at best a 6-7 win program. They use this to disqualify his success in a loaded west. Mullen is doing fine and if he keeps building and some other teams in the west slip, he could capitalize. I think a fair program comparison is MSU pre Mullen and South Carolina pre Spurrier. Look at Spurrier's record since he took over in 05. The blueprint is simple. String together 500 or winning seasons and bowl trips, build your team off that success, and take advantage of the oppurtunity when a "big boy" falters.
<table class="wikitable"><tbody><tr><td>
2005</td><td>
South Carolina</td><td>7–5</td><td>5–3</td><td>T–2nd
(East)</td><td>
L Independence</td><td style="text-align:right">
</td><td style="text-align:right">
</td></tr><tr><td>
2006</td><td>
South Carolina</td><td>8–5</td><td>3–5</td><td>5th
(East)</td><td>
W Liberty</td><td style="text-align:right">
</td><td style="text-align:right">
</td></tr><tr><td>
2007</td><td>
South Carolina</td><td>6–6</td><td>3–5</td><td>T–4th
(East)</td><td>
</td><td style="text-align:right">
</td><td style="text-align:right">
</td></tr><tr><td>
2008</td><td>
South Carolina</td><td>7–6</td><td>4–4</td><td>T–3rd
(East)</td><td>
L Outback</td><td style="text-align:right">
</td><td style="text-align:right">
</td></tr><tr><td>
2009</td><td>
South Carolina</td><td>7–6</td><td>3–5</td><td>T–4th
(East)</td><td>
L PapaJohns.com</td><td style="text-align:right">
</td><td style="text-align:right">
</td></tr><tr style="background:#bff"><td>
2010</td><td>
South Carolina</td><td>9–5</td><td>5–3</td><td>1st
(East)</td><td>
L Chick-Fil-A</td><td style="text-align:right">22</td><td style="text-align:right">22</td></tr><tr><td>
2011</td><td>
South Carolina</td><td>11–2</td><td>6–2</td><td>2nd
(East)</td><td>
W Capital One</td><td style="text-align:right">8</td><td style="text-align:right">9</td></tr></tbody></table>