<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">
For four days I have followed the debacle at the end of the game Sunday and I have yet
to see a video of the “foul” ball.</span></p>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">I realize
this isn’t going to change the outcome, but I just want to know, did it hit him
or not… </span></p>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">Tide TV has a
replay of the game winning hit and shows several other at bats – from two
different angles no less. Surely they have video of the previous pitch. With
those two options it should be really easy to follow the path of the ball. Wasn’t
it just a few years ago that a certain reporter freeze framed video to
determine if a certain quarterback’s foot had cross the line of scrimmage.</span></p>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">Who is hiding
what? Surely the SEC would want to prove their guy got it right, wouldn’t they?</span></p>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">Come on you
techno wizards. Get us the video so we can move on – we know it was shot from
two different angles.</span></p>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">Let’s settle
this once and for all.</span></p>
</p>
For four days I have followed the debacle at the end of the game Sunday and I have yet
to see a video of the “foul” ball.</span></p>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">I realize
this isn’t going to change the outcome, but I just want to know, did it hit him
or not… </span></p>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">Tide TV has a
replay of the game winning hit and shows several other at bats – from two
different angles no less. Surely they have video of the previous pitch. With
those two options it should be really easy to follow the path of the ball. Wasn’t
it just a few years ago that a certain reporter freeze framed video to
determine if a certain quarterback’s foot had cross the line of scrimmage.</span></p>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">Who is hiding
what? Surely the SEC would want to prove their guy got it right, wouldn’t they?</span></p>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">Come on you
techno wizards. Get us the video so we can move on – we know it was shot from
two different angles.</span></p>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">Let’s settle
this once and for all.</span></p>
</p>