Which team on the schedule is Stansbury's next WTF?
- Thread starter Coach34
- Start date
- Status
I say bring John Wooden's 99 year old wrinkled *** over here to coach. Maybe we can dig up James Naismith. Coach K is probably tired of Duke but his failures in the NCAA tournament recently would exclude him from Coach's list.
Tell me again how Jim Boeheim managed to lose an exhibition game to a Division II school? When Delta State beats us, let me know. Until then, this retarded **** about firing Stansbury is mind-boggling.
Tell me again how Jim Boeheim managed to lose an exhibition game to a Division II school? When Delta State beats us, let me know. Until then, this retarded **** about firing Stansbury is mind-boggling.
He thinks Stansbury is a bad coach. Earlier, in the same posts where he explains his frustration that "we are never going to win big as long as he is here. And thats fine with most of you seemingly" he also says he doesn't think he should be fired.
WTF is that? You think he is a bad coach and will never win anything of meaning yet you do not want him fired!?!?
(And before "where did I say he is a bad coach" is asked...I don't know what you considered worse than decent, but you clearly don't even think he is a "decent" coach.)
WTF is that? You think he is a bad coach and will never win anything of meaning yet you do not want him fired!?!?
(And before "where did I say he is a bad coach" is asked...I don't know what you considered worse than decent, but you clearly don't even think he is a "decent" coach.)
... or two as happened vs Rider.</p>
As we all know, Stansbury poor defense was the reason that New Orleans got flooded by Katrina ...
</p>
</p>
As we all know, Stansbury poor defense was the reason that New Orleans got flooded by Katrina ...
</p>
</p>
Apparently, there is a "video of the day" feature. The one showing at the time, "How To Coach Baseball."
Sweet.
Sweet.
saying the same exact **** over and over hoping for the worst so they can come back on here after a loss and gloat about how terrible our basketball team is and how terrible our basketball coach is and how anybody can't see we've got the worst basketball coach in NCAA history is beyond them. The schtick is old already, yet we have threads with people arguing with these idiots that take up half the page and it's the same old ********, same argument that has made this board completely unreadable during basketball season. And to think, it's only been one damn game. DS, make a new rule or something - one thread a day from your good buddies bashing Stans and that's it. Start locking any other threads stating the same ****. I think you bought enough bandwidth for us to actually talk about something other than how bad our basketball coach sucks. Otherwise, this board will remain unreadable for the next 4.5 months.
DS must either:
a) think that C34 keeps conversation going thus bringing more people back to the board for more hits
b)Like an alternative point of view keeping w/ the original theme of this board not being "wooly" and a place where negativity and complaining is welcome
DS is all about the hits, but what he should realize is that it turns people off. The same fight gets old after awhile, as does c34 taking every opportunity to make an underhanded negative post about Stans. I just get tired of every single post being negative and finding a way to take away credit from Stans in every possible situation, or to say we only did something positive in spite of Stans or b/c of luck. Negativity gets old fast, especially when it isn't called for, then it just comes off as bitterness.</p>
a) think that C34 keeps conversation going thus bringing more people back to the board for more hits
b)Like an alternative point of view keeping w/ the original theme of this board not being "wooly" and a place where negativity and complaining is welcome
DS is all about the hits, but what he should realize is that it turns people off. The same fight gets old after awhile, as does c34 taking every opportunity to make an underhanded negative post about Stans. I just get tired of every single post being negative and finding a way to take away credit from Stans in every possible situation, or to say we only did something positive in spite of Stans or b/c of luck. Negativity gets old fast, especially when it isn't called for, then it just comes off as bitterness.</p>
i dont care one way or the other.....but how hard is it not to click on the thread and not read it? i may have a difficult system to learn for reading this board but i will share it: I look at the topic titles and then determine whether i put the cursor over it and press my clicker. that determination is made by whether i think there might be something in that topics thread that may interest me. if so, i read. if not, i dont. stop crying about banning people and "same old ****" threads and just choose not to read them. at this point its just whiny bitching. get over it and skip the thread.
- Status