How many other teams can say that???
USM 3-7x
UAB 5-5 (must beat Marshall or USM)
USA 6-4
LSU 7-4
aTm 7-4
Aub 7-3
UK 5-6 (must beat Louisville)
Ark 5-5 (must beat TSUN or Mizzou)
UTM (N/A)
Ala 9-1
Van 3-7x
TSUN 8-2
For FBS teams, you mean, right? Because UTM won't be "bowl eligible" since they are an FCS team.
I wanted to compare that to others, so here is Ole Miss followed by Alabama.
OLE MISS
Boise State 8-2
Vandy 3-7x
ULL 7-3
Memphis 7-3
Bama 9-1
A&M 7-4
Tennessee 5-5 (must beat Mizzou or Vandy)
LSU 7-4
Auburn 7-3
Presby (N/A)
Arkansas 5-5 (must beat Ole Miss or Mizzou)
MSU 9-1
BAMA
West Va 6-4
Fla Atl 3-7x
USM 3-7x
Florida 5-4 (must beat Eastern Kentucky or FSU)
Ole Miss 8-2
Arkansas 5-5 (must beat Ole Miss or Mizzou)
A&M 7-4
Tennessee 5-5 (must beat Mizzou or Vandy)
LSU 7-4
MSU 9-1
West Car (N/A)
Auburn 7-3
Guaranteed Bowl Eligible:
MSU - 6
Ole Miss - 8
Bama - 6
Guaranteed NOT Bowl Eligible:
MSU - 2
Ole Miss - 1
Bama - 2
Likely Bowl Eligible:
MSU - 1.5 (UAB, perhaps Arkansas)
Ole Miss - 1.5 (Tenn, perhaps Arkansas)
Bama - 2.5 (Florida, Tennessee, perhaps Arkansas)
Given all of that, I would honestly say that Ole Miss and Bama have the tougher overall schedule if you are just looking bowl eligibility. Let's be real, I just don't want to leave it up to the committee to go "well look at their nonconference." Because it looks really bad.
Nonconference W/L without MSU/Ole Miss/Bama results:
MSU - 19-18
Ole Miss - 28-11
Bama - 20-21
So, nonconference could really hurt both MSU and Bama, but if Bama wins the Iron Bowl and SECCG, then they are definitely in and nonconference doesn't matter. If MSU is fighting for that 4th spot, then you can bet the committee is going to scrutinize that. Just imagine if the Oklahoma State game was this year instead of last year. Sure, they are only 5-5 right now, but Oklahoma State at 5-5 would be seen as so much better than UAB at 5-5. Just the way it is.