Toggle sidebar

White House altered transcript (so it's not a transcript)

atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,676
6,283
113
tjebarr said:
Consciousness Of Guilt: Vindman Testified that White House Altered Transcript
https://politizoom.com/2019/10/30/c...estified-that-white-house-altered-transcript/

National security official tells Congress he tried to add edits to White House memo about Trump Ukraine call
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tr...ls-congress-he-tried-add-edits-white-n1073726
Click to expand...

Oh here we go again...first paragraph in the story...this is the "official" corroboration of the entire story.....wait for it......
one lawmaker present at the testimony and another source familiar with it confirmed to NBC News.

  • who is this?
  • why aren't they named?
  • how are we to verify this claim?
  • what is the means they used to verify this?
  • when did they know this?
  • where did they first attempt to add this information?
Who, what, when, where, how, why. The basic components ANY J school student is taught MUST be in your story in order for it to be first credible, then believable, and above all factual. This is NBC News, talking about possible damning evidence to impeach a sitting President and they make this explosive allegation which could very well be the heart of the impeachment charge against the President without independent verification, corroboration, or authentication.

Passed along with glee and obviously full belief by none other than that authenticated muckraking paragon of Journalistic integrity himself...

This freakin' stupid *** lookin' goober

Hi...I know you see my hat!

Deer:That goober look needs no corroboration atl.
 
Last edited:
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,242
3,304
113
W

WVU80ate_rivals

Redshirt
Jun 10, 2003
4,243
0
0
atlkvb said:
Oh here we go again...first paragraph in the story...this is the "official" corroboration of the entire story.....wait for it......
one lawmaker present at the testimony and another source familiar with it confirmed to NBC News.

  • who is this?
  • why aren't they named?
  • how are we to verify this claim?
  • what is the means they used to verify this?
  • when did they know this?
  • where did they first attempt to add this information?
Who, what, when, where, how, why. The basic components ANY J school student is taught MUST be in your story in order for it to be first credible, then believable, and above all factual. This is NBC News, talking about possible damning evidence to impeach a sitting President and they make this explosive allegation which could very well be the heart of the impeachment charge against the President without independent verification, corroboration, or authentication.

Passed along with glee and obviously full belief by none other than that authenticated muckraking paragon of Journalistic integrity himself...

This freakin' stupid *** lookin' goober

Hi...I know you see my hat!

Deer:That goober look needs no corroboration atl.
Click to expand...
I’ve actually wondered when the allegations of a “doctored” WH transcript would come up. Anyone who believes this ongoing nonsense needs committed.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,676
6,283
113
WVU80ate said:
I’ve actually wondered when the allegations of a “doctored” WH transcript would come up. Anyone who believes this ongoing nonsense needs committed.
Click to expand...

Imagine that. We can't see or hear the so called "whistleblower", we can't see or hear the so called "eyewitnesses" to the Ukraine phone call, we can't see or hear the actual transcripts of the testimony behind closed doors in committee, and we can't see or hear from the actual folks reporting all the damning testimony we're being told about in the media daily that is the "smoking gun" needed to impeach and then convict Trump.o_O

Oh and I almost forgot, the "inquiry" into all of this isn't even the official "investigation" which would allow the President's counsel as well as committee Republicans to see and hear or question their own witnesses.[eyeroll]

You said this @WVU80ate in your post

"Anyone who believes this ongoing nonsense needs committed"

This is correct, I'd add anyone who reports any of this circus as fact without asking any questions about it shouldn't be believed.
 
S

Snow Sled Baby

Senior
Jan 4, 2003
44,738
542
103
atlkvb said:
Imagine that. We can't see or hear the so called "whistleblower", we can't see or hear the so called "eyewitnesses" to the Ukraine phone call, we can't see or hear the actual transcripts of the testimony behind closed doors in committee, and we can't see or hear from the actual folks reporting all the damning testimony we're being told about in the media daily that is the "smoking gun" needed to impeach and then convict Trump.o_O

Oh and I almost forgot, the "inquiry" into all of this isn't even the official "investigation" which would allow the President's counsel as well as committee Republicans to see and hear or question their own witnesses.[eyeroll]

You said this @WVU80ate in your post

"Anyone who believes this ongoing nonsense needs committed"

This is correct, I'd add anyone who reports any of this circus as fact without asking any questions about it shouldn't be believed.
Click to expand...
I see you are here causing trouble again.....don't you feel bad enough polluting the atmosphere with all those nasty gas guzzlers you shamelessly peddle every day.......AOC doesn't like you very much
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,676
6,283
113
DvlDog4WVU said:
Witness himself said the omissions were of no consequence to the substance.
Click to expand...

Well there were changes to the transcript. It was "edited". He testified to it. At least one lawmaker inside heard it...no one else did, who could confirm it, but at least one heard it don't 'ya know? [eyeroll]
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,676
6,283
113
Snow Sled Baby said:
I see you are here causing trouble again.....don't you feel bad enough polluting the atmosphere with all those nasty gas guzzlers you shamelessly peddle every day.......AOC doesn't like you very much
Click to expand...

I sell enough "gas guzzlers" to make her "get out the vote" efforts worthwhile Snow my Man! They ride around in 15 passenger Transit Connect 350's hauling all of those unregistered voters around to different polling precincts! [winking]

 
S

Snow Sled Baby

Senior
Jan 4, 2003
44,738
542
103
atlkvb said:
I sell enough "gas guzzlers" to make her "get out the vote" efforts worthwhile Snow my Man! They ride around in 15 passenger Transit Connect 350's hauling all of those unregistered voters around to different polling precincts! [winking]

Click to expand...
all the while drinking water out of those damned plastic bottles[cheers]
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
G

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,255
4,088
113
WVUCOOPER said:
Go team!!

At least you openly embrace being pathetic. Beats the pretend folks.
Click to expand...

Demand to see the transcripts from Trump's previous conversations with the Ukraine President. He's told reporters several times they exist. Running for political office doesn't give you a free pass from being investigated. As long as the probable cause to the start the investigation in not made up by your political opponent, never verified by the investigators, and then used to get illegal FISA warrants then Trump has nothing to worry about. Can't say I feel that's going to work out as well for the previous administration.
 
T

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
Gunny46 said:
Demand to see the transcripts from Trump's previous conversations with the Ukraine President. He's told reporters several times they exist. Running for political office doesn't give you a free pass from being investigated. As long as the probable cause to the start the investigation in not made up by your political opponent, never verified by the investigators, and then used to get illegal FISA warrants then Trump has nothing to worry about. Can't say I feel that's going to work out as well for the previous administration.
Click to expand...

So, who gets indicted and goes to jail from the previous administration?
 
G

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,255
4,088
113
tjebarr said:
So, who gets indicted and goes to jail from the previous administration?
Click to expand...

Maybe you should had paid attention to what others have shared instead of flipping back and forth between Rachel Maddow and CNN. Nobody can predict what a grand jury or trial jury will do. However I would love to get your opinion on if John Brennan pleads the 5th or not.
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Gunny46 said:
Demand to see the transcripts from Trump's previous conversations with the Ukraine President. He's told reporters several times they exist. Running for political office doesn't give you a free pass from being investigated. As long as the probable cause to the start the investigation in not made up by your political opponent, never verified by the investigators, and then used to get illegal FISA warrants then Trump has nothing to worry about. Can't say I feel that's going to work out as well for the previous administration.
Click to expand...
Ok I demand to see the transcripts.

Running from office doesn't keep you away from being investigated - see Hillary in 2016. Being an American should keep the President of the United States of America from asking a foreign government to investigate you. Running for office or not. Pathetic your "team" of America hating cucks wants foreign governments to investigate American citizens instead of the American DOJ.
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Gunny46 said:
Maybe you should had paid attention to what others have shared instead of flipping back and forth between Rachel Maddow and CNN. Nobody can predict what a grand jury or trial jury will do. However I would love to get your opinion on if John Brennan pleads the 5th or not.
Click to expand...
TL;DR - No one. And it's all the lib media and DEEPSTATE's fault. :joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:
 
G

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,255
4,088
113
WVUCOOPER said:
Ok I demand to see the transcripts.

Running from office doesn't keep you away from being investigated - see Hillary in 2016. Being an American should keep the President of the United States of America from asking a foreign government to investigate you. Running for office or not. Pathetic your "team" of America hating cucks wants foreign governments to investigate American citizens instead of the American DOJ.
Click to expand...

We are not extradicting Biden to Ukraine. I only care about DOJ investigations.
 
T

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
Gunny46 said:
Maybe you should had paid attention to what others have shared instead of flipping back and forth between Rachel Maddow and CNN. Nobody can predict what a grand jury or trial jury will do. However I would love to get your opinion on if John Brennan pleads the 5th or not.
Click to expand...

Trial jury? So, who from the Obama administration is going to trial?
 
G

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,255
4,088
113
tjebarr said:
I read when you said Comey and Hillary were going to jail. Turns out you were WRONG
Click to expand...

When did I say Hillary was going to jail or any other political figure? She should. I said Comey was in trouble. He was referred for prosecution for one thing already. More to come on him. Now does Brennan plead the 5th or not ?
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Gunny46 said:
When did I say Hillary was going to jail or any other political figure? She should. I said Comey was in trouble. He was referred for prosecution for one thing already. More to come on him. Now does Brennan plead the 5th or not ?
Click to expand...

What crime did she commit?

Gunny46 said:
When did I say Hillary was going to jail or any other political figure? She should. I said Comey was in trouble. He was referred for prosecution for one thing already. More to come on him. Now does Brennan plead the 5th or not ?
Click to expand...

He was? What was the charge? Is he still being charged?
 
G

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,255
4,088
113
countryroads89 said:
What crime did she commit?



He was? What was the charge? Is he still being charged?
Click to expand...

Let's wait until Durham is done with his investigation. However if you want to defend her record knock yourself out. There are several Democrats who want her to go away. Major Tulsi Gabbard comes to mind.
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Gunny46 said:
Let's wait until Durham is done with his investigation. However if you want to defend her record knock yourself out. There are several Democrats who want her to go away. Major Tulsi Gabbard comes to mind.
Click to expand...

LOL! So you are whining that she should be "locked up" but you can't name a crime. LMAO!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom