White House altered transcript (so it's not a transcript)

[Boomboom521]

She’s my girl!

 

[TarHeelEer]

 

[Boomboom521]

Why alter it? And I see we are to believe CNN’s anonymous sources when it fits our narrative? Got it.

 

[tjebarr]

CNN..??

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Why alter it? And I see we are to believe CNN’s anonymous sources when it fits our narrative? Got it.

I’d hazard and say when CNN has been outed for having an “impeach-Trump” philosophy, reporting it as nothing significant, I’d tend to say they’re calling a fair game. They could’ve easily not reported that or further, inflamed it.

 

[Shirley Knott]

Imagine that. We can't see or hear the so called "whistleblower", we can't see or hear the so called "eyewitnesses" to the Ukraine phone call, we can't see or hear the actual transcripts of the testimony behind closed doors in committee, and we can't see or hear from the actual folks reporting all the damning testimony we're being told about in the media daily that is the "smoking gun" needed to impeach and then convict Trump.

Oh and I almost forgot, the "inquiry" into all of this isn't even the official "investigation" which would allow the President's counsel as well as committee Republicans to see and hear or question their own witnesses.[eyeroll]

You said this @WVU80ate in your post

"Anyone who believes this ongoing nonsense needs committed"

This is correct, I'd add anyone who reports any of this circus as fact without asking any questions about it shouldn't be believed.

I suppose we will eventually be able to read the "Whistleblower" transcripts......or maybe Schittff will narrate them for us....