Who wants to take a swing at this one?

Aug 19, 2018
9,810
78
0
TVZ....trying to divert attention from his anti white. BURN LOOT MURDER religion. What a dork.

You are just angry
Really find out if this anger is real or has been created.

If the things you said are true you should be a smart man and know how to think correctly.
That is how future officers are train in the US Military
At least the USMC and USN


I don't see anything to be this angry about..

Sad thing is anger is being created by these politicians.
 
May 29, 2001
20,973
78
0
oh like the red skin people killed other red skinned people first? How black Africans sold their own people into slavery in the Americas?

Shut up you old hag.

So you approved of massacres of Sioux, Seminole, etc. who were here long before Pilgrims and Columbus came ashore, the Japanese-American citizens slammed into concentration camps, using slaves to pick cotton, keeping South and Central Americans from seeking freedom in America? Well, you must be a Republican and Trump
 

WVUALLEN

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
64,503
441
83
Racism is a vile thing. Hating someone because of an immutable characteristic such as skin color, location of birth, or parentage makes no logical sense. It's also a terrible thing to dilute the term by levying it against anyone with scant to no evidence just to frame the other person and/or their position as outside the realm of reasonable debate. I hate the Black Lives Matter movement and organization because the name and the agenda are not congruent. The movement pushes a neo-Marxist ideology that wants to abolish the nuclear family and capitalism while saying any system where there are disproportionate outcomes between groups, regardless of choices made amongst those groups, is bigoted. That is an illogical, evil, and authoritarian agenda which has nothing to do with agreeing to the concept that black lives matter. The name is just a Trojan horse to shield against legitimate criticism of the core agenda. Just like being opposed to PETA does not make you against "ethical" treatment of animals nor does being opposed to the ACLU's recent stance on limiting freedom of speech in the US make you opposed to "civil liberties."

These individuals attacking the school are not speaking of BLM, civil liberties, Peta. They're claiming something not proven and show hate for it. Perhaps I overstated the racist part and should have just called them what they are which is misinformed and lacking knowledge of the entire situation that has caused their hate towards a certain man and university.

Making bold statements such as they have without proof shows they are scared.

I to do not like the BLM movement anymore than you and what it pretends to stand for. This was not the intent of the original beginning. PETA, now that's a name rarely thrown about anymore.

Highly well thought out post. Appreciate it.
 

WVUALLEN

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
64,503
441
83
Enough with the racist ignoramous rants.

Black Lives Matters has nothing to do with "neo-Marxist ideology that wants to abolish the nuclear family and capitalism while saying any system where there are disproportionate outcomes between groups, regardless of choices made amongst those groups, is bigoted."

That is a LIE created by human hating fascists with a world view that they are the only form of life on earth that matters.

BLM exists because black people are being MURDERED and BRUTALIZED by police (and others) in large numbers every year, much as everyone saw George Floyd murdered. And then, justice is NOT served if the cases ever make it to a court--9 times out of 10 NO CHARGES. Its happened again and again. Its time for this to stop. These people are not committing crimes, not carrying weapons, not resisting arrest. They may be sleeping in their bedroom. Walking down the street. They are being targeted by racists and brutalized and often murdered in numbers disproportionate to the numbers they represent in the general population. The ones who see these crimes committed and try to endlessly cover them up are the ones with an anti-American agenda.

The bigots trying to mischaracterize it as something else are the same ones committing and approving of these horrid crimes against humanity.

They try to call others anti American, when what they want is a Russian style dictatorship with Oligarchs (probably see themselves in this role) ruling over everyone else. Its dangerous, evil and needs to be stopped and has NO PLACE in The United States of America or the world in general, let alone on sports message boards.

You have no idea what BLM is or was originally started for and what it has become.

In 2013, three radical Black organizers — Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi — created a Black-centered political will and movement building project called #BlackLivesMatter. It was in response to the acquittal of Trayvon Martin’s murderer, George Zimmerman.

BLM has since become an organization equal to ANTIFA. a political protest movement comprising autonomous groups affiliated by their militant opposition to fascism and other forms of extreme right-wing ideology.

These 2 groups under disguise of being protestors destroyed the businesses of hard working people, murdered police officers and innocent children. The so called peaceful protest became a cover for these two to do their damage and their so called WOKE movements.

These United States are no longer a free country.

It's interesting blacks are still being murdered by cops yet nothing is protested or rioting about it now.

More whites are killed by cops than any other race.
 
Feb 15, 2005
7,083
60
0
These individuals attacking the school are not speaking of BLM, civil liberties, Peta. They're claiming something not proven and show hate for it. Perhaps I overstated the racist part and should have just called them what they are which is misinformed and lacking knowledge of the entire situation that has caused their hate towards a certain man and university.

Making bold statements such as they have without proof shows they are scared.

I to do not like the BLM movement anymore than you and what it pretends to stand for. This was not the intent of the original beginning. PETA, now that's a name rarely thrown about anymore.

Highly well thought out post. Appreciate it.

PETA is not really relevant anymore, but they are emblematic of the concept. The name is "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals." Yet under that umbrella they have the idea that all human to animal interaction is wrong including pet ownership and farming (not just for slaughter either). So when someone opposes any of the agenda, even if it's only the most fringe/radical parts, they can paint them as being against the "ethical" treatment of animals. So if you are just opposed to cruel treatment of animals, they will lump you in with those that are cruel by not pushing their agenda. Just like with BLM, agreeing that human life is of equal value across the board regardless of skin color is not enough. You must agree with the implementation and assumed future efficacy of all of BLM's desired social and policy changes lest you be lumped in with actual vile racists.
 

WVUALLEN

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
64,503
441
83
So you approved of massacres of Sioux, Seminole, etc. who were here long before Pilgrims and Columbus came ashore, the Japanese-American citizens slammed into concentration camps, using slaves to pick cotton, keeping South and Central Americans from seeking freedom in America? Well, you must be a Republican and Trump

Better than being a liberal in favor of dementia man Biden.
 
Feb 15, 2005
7,083
60
0
So you approved of massacres of Sioux, Seminole, etc. who were here long before Pilgrims and Columbus came ashore, the Japanese-American citizens slammed into concentration camps, using slaves to pick cotton, keeping South and Central Americans from seeking freedom in America? Well, you must be a Republican and Trump

You are aware that it was the "progressive" Democrat idol of FDR that interred the Japanese Americans? Or that it was Southern Democrats that engaged in slavery and the Jim Crow oppression post Civil War? South flipped from Democrat 25-30 years AFTER the Civil Rights fight of the 60's against Democrat law makers. For someone as long in the tooth as you, I'd expect you to remeber things more than 20 years ago. Lastly your same Democrats were anti illegal immigration less than 15 years ago. So opposing illegal immigration isn't opposition to people "seeking freedom" in America. Sure if the US didn't have massive social programs, you could go back to the Ellis Isle style immigration from the 19th century where derelicts would not survive and immigrants had to actually be productive citizens. But that's not the immigration your opposition is trying to stop, but rather those with little prospect other than being at least partially dependent on public support. And your opposition's stance is common across many countries including Canada which has far more stringent regulation for both illegal and legal immigration than the US. Again these were events that occurred during your lifetime.
 
Last edited:

Rootmaster

New member
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
You are aware that it was the "progressive" Democrat idol of FDR that interred the Japanese Americans? Or that it was Southern Democrats that engaged in slavery and the Jim Crow oppression post Civil War? South flipped from Democrat 25-30 years AFTER the Civil Rights fight of the 60's against Democrat law makers. For someone as long in the tooth as you, I'd expect you to remeber things more than 20 years ago. Lastly your same Democrats were anti illegal immigration less than 15 years ago. So opposing illegal immigration isn't opposition to people "seeking freedom" in America. Sure if the US didn't have massive social programs, you could go back to the Ellis Isle style immigration from the 19th century where derelicts would not survive and immigrants had to actually be productive citizens. But that's not the immigration your opposition is trying to stop, but rather those with little prospect other than public support. And your opposition's stance is common across many countries including Canada which has far more stringent regulation for both illegal and legal immigration than the US. Again these were events that occurred during your lifetime.
This is a great post. Not only factually sound but casts a bright light on the fake blowhard CFE. Then again DemWits don't respond to facts.
 
May 29, 2001
20,973
78
0
You are aware that it was the "progressive" Democrat idol of FDR that interred the Japanese Americans? Or that it was Southern Democrats that engaged in slavery and the Jim Crow oppression post Civil War? South flipped from Democrat 25-30 years AFTER the Civil Rights fight of the 60's against Democrat law makers. For someone as long in the tooth as you, I'd expect you to remeber things more than 20 years ago. Lastly your same Democrats were anti illegal immigration less than 15 years ago. So opposing illegal immigration isn't opposition to people "seeking freedom" in America. Sure if the US didn't have massive social programs, you could go back to the Ellis Isle style immigration from the 19th century where derelicts would not survive and immigrants had to actually be productive citizens. But that's not the immigration your opposition is trying to stop, but rather those with little prospect other than being at least partially dependent on public support. And your opposition's stance is common across many countries including Canada which has far more stringent regulation for both illegal and legal immigration than the US. Again these were events that occurred during your lifetime.

Interning Japanese-American citizens was terribly wrong. I've said that many times.

Jim Crow was an atrocity. I've said that many times.

As always, I oppose actions. And Republican actions since Lincoln died have been appalling. Systematic voter suppression of people of color. Citing BLM when white supremacists attacked the Capitol. Refusing to let a black President's Supreme Court nominee even be voted on for NINE MONTHS. Coddling up to Putin -- both Trump and Moscow Mitch. I remember the bad old days, including slaughtering tribes and forcing them off land they had lived on for centuries, slaves in the south, KKK, and bad new days with the KKK, neo-Nazis and white supremacists publicly endorsing Trump because, as THEY said, "He gets us." You left out a bit of the story, didn't you? Typical white supremacist Republican!
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
78
0
Democrats are evil

Republicans are good.

We are better than that. Especially to use stupid narratives.

There were a lot of people who changed parties in this country...
To a lesser extent this happened recently with Donald Trump.
You can look no further than the Gov of WV

But the last major change was over Gun rights
Democrats killed themselves in 1993 over the Brady Bill.
NRA went after them. You had a lot of people change from Republican do Democrat

The people who governed haven't really changed even through their party has....


Can't look at party labels today and think those same parties are the same as they were 20 years ago. Especially 50 years ago.

Just look at the Republicans.

A lot of the Hardcore Republicans have moved away from the party recently...

Same as you have had some Democrats become Republicans over Trump
 
Last edited:
Feb 15, 2005
7,083
60
0
Interning Japanese-American citizens was terribly wrong. I've said that many times.

Jim Crow was an atrocity. I've said that many times.

As always, I oppose actions. And Republican actions since Lincoln died have been appalling. Systematic voter suppression of people of color. Citing BLM when white supremacists attacked the Capitol. Refusing to let a black President's Supreme Court nominee even be voted on for NINE MONTHS. Coddling up to Putin -- both Trump and Moscow Mitch. I remember the bad old days, including slaughtering tribes and forcing them off land they had lived on for centuries, slaves in the south, KKK, and bad new days with the KKK, neo-Nazis and white supremacists publicly endorsing Trump because, as THEY said, "He gets us." You left out a bit of the story, didn't you? Typical white supremacist Republican!

Since Lincoln? All the voter suppression of black people from post Civil War until the Civil Rights act were Democrat. And that was real suppression, not the current garbage talking point that things like requiring a photo ID is suppression.
I'm not saying parties can't change, but you are trying to say that Republicans were responsible for things from decades ago that they weren't. You seem to agree with the Orwellian idea that there is only a never ending present where your narrative is above reproach. All Republicans are racist, therefore all prior atrocities are their doing. All Republicans are dullard thugs just like the Capitol rioters, but don't paint all of BLM or their Democrat supporters with the same brush as those that did 2 BILLION dollars in damage through multiple riots across multiple months. Nevermind that prominent Republicans denounced the one riot at the Capital and prominent Democrats like the current Vice President tried to rationalize and justify the months of riots.

Refusal to vote on a black President's nominee? Over 25 times a Supreme Court vacancy has opened in the last year of a presidential term. Nearly all cases where the POTUS and Senate were opposing parties the nominee was not voted on or not confirmed. Opposite is true for when both sides are of the same political party. But the time it happened in 2016 it was all due to Republican racism and not that the nominee was not palatable to the party's agenda? As if the Republicans would have not voted on Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, or Barrett had they been nominated by Obama?

Coddling up to Putin? You mean when Romney called them a legitimate threat to the US in 2012 and Obama mocked him? The same Obama that told Russian officials to let Putin know he was just posturing tough for the election and would be more "flexible" after? The same that allowed the Russian invasion of Crimea with hardly even a strongly worded statement? The same that turned over Syria to Russian control? Where are your examples of Trump or Mitch taking it even more easy on Russia than that? Now I'm not saying that Trump was great at handling Russia. I am ointing out that you don't really give a **** about Russia, just using it as a convenient political club.

Republicans oppose illegal immigration and they say it's because of avoiding overcrowding the job and social program pool, but it's really because they hate brown people. However when Obama, Schumer, Pelosi, and Hillary were all anti illegal immigration 12 years ago ... it's because they have compassion for American workers. Or was that shoved down the memory hole and current Democrats were never opposed to illegal immigration?

KKK members say they support Trump?
Anti-semites, Farrakahn for example, support every Democrat. So are we to say that this makes all Democrats anti-semites? A Bernie supporter shot up Republican lawmakers in an act far more heinous than the Capital riot this year. He did it while shouting a Bernie campaign talking point. A talking point that other Democrats have echoed regarding healthcare. Does that mean all Democrats are blood thirsty nutjobs?
 
Last edited:
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
78
0
This message board really isn't a place for politics....

But the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was recently removed.

Because of the removal states have closed polling places in predominantly minority communities.

I don't know if WV.was included in this but other states were so the federal government had a say in their elections.

Without the federal government they have closed numerous polling places for no reason besides to make it harder for minorities to vote.


I wouldn't say current garbage talking points.

**** is obvious...

Most of these states have high minority populations
 

Rootmaster

New member
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
CFE never wrote a newspaper story in his sad life. Never golfed. Never made a dollar other than a government check. Typical DemWit far left loon pretending his way through life.
 
Feb 15, 2005
7,083
60
0
CFE never wrote a newspaper story in his sad life. Never golfed. Never made a dollar other than a government check. Typical DemWit far left loon pretending his way through life.

I'm willing to bet he did write for small time papers. Honest work and nothing wrong with it. I do think he lords it over people as to why his OPINION on something sports related is superior to other fans. He also thinks it makes him small timr famous. Like knowing someone like Mickey is some big accomplishment and his job makes him better than simple trade workers. But the worst is in our last exchange where he simply calls anyone who has a differing opinion than him as having the most vile motives. If you think being a racist or white supremacist is such a terrible thing, which I certainly do, you are being disingenuous *** when you just throw it around with little cause.
 

Rootmaster

New member
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
CFE is the prototype for the last kid chosen for the team in gym class...the one who blamed his miserable day on the bully...and the one who got the answers to the quiz before the quiz to try to look smart. He is also the one whose dad paid his date to go out with him. In short...a loser who pretends his way through life.
 

SKYHAWKBALL

New member
Oct 28, 2005
10,505
7
0
what the fucc are you rambling about? The voting right act was never removed. Idiot. Oh the horror of actually showing a Voter ID card.

This message board really isn't a place for politics....

But the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was recently removed.

Because of the removal states have closed polling places in predominantly minority communities.

I don't know if WV.was included in this but other states were so the federal government had a say in their elections.

Without the federal government they have closed numerous polling places for no reason besides to make it harder for minorities to vote.


I wouldn't say current garbage talking points.

**** is obvious...

Most of these states have high minority populations
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
78
0
what the fucc are you rambling about? The voting right act was never removed. Idiot. Oh the horror of actually showing a Voter ID card.

You are clueless..
Section 5 was removed.

Since it was removed you are an extremely high amount of polling places removed from minority communities

Isn't just about voter ID
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
78
0
in 2013, so “not recently”.

And it isn’t just about removing polling places in minority communities

learn your history.


Continue to argue about this...


The federal government looked over the shoulder. That was removed.

This really isn't racist. If they voted Republican it would be open..

It is more partisan. Big difference.

All attempts at keeping people from voting have been partisan.

They just happen to be minorities